_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Tiger II Jack Question
AFVFan
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: May 17, 2012
KitMaker: 1,980 posts
Armorama: 1,571 posts
Posted: Friday, July 07, 2017 - 01:28 PM UTC
Does anyone have any idea of when the jack on the Tiger II was moved from the original mounting point under the mufflers? I gather they just started storing it internally.
wedgetail53
Visit this Community
Queensland, Australia
Joined: October 02, 2008
KitMaker: 658 posts
Armorama: 629 posts
Posted: Friday, July 07, 2017 - 01:46 PM UTC
G'day Bob

The jack and block were deleted in about mid October 1944, although I have seen a pic of a KT with block but no jack.

Regards

Rob
AFVFan
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: May 17, 2012
KitMaker: 1,980 posts
Armorama: 1,571 posts
Posted: Friday, July 07, 2017 - 04:27 PM UTC
Thanks Rob. I've seen a few pics with the block still mounted, but jack gone. In fact, that's what prompted this query. Appreciate the info.
ivanhoe6
Visit this Community
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: April 05, 2007
KitMaker: 2,023 posts
Armorama: 1,234 posts
Posted: Friday, July 07, 2017 - 05:27 PM UTC
Are there any pictures out there of the jack being used ?
In my limited collection of reference material I've never seen a single photo of one being used.
Biggles2
Visit this Community
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Friday, July 07, 2017 - 07:19 PM UTC
I really doubt they stored the jack INSIDE the tank - what would be the advantage? Disadvantages - lack of space - extreme difficulty passing it out a hatch. They probably realized that it was pointless trying to repair Tiger ll tracks or wheels in the field - an immobilized Tiger ll was as good as lost!
AFVFan
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: May 17, 2012
KitMaker: 1,980 posts
Armorama: 1,571 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 08, 2017 - 12:28 AM UTC
Don't think I've ever run across a picture of one in use either.

Storing it inside would be insane. That thing had to weigh 50 pounds, or better. I think the crew would have just let it ride on the engine deck instead.
wedgetail53
Visit this Community
Queensland, Australia
Joined: October 02, 2008
KitMaker: 658 posts
Armorama: 629 posts
Posted: Saturday, July 08, 2017 - 03:51 AM UTC
I agree with Biggles - I think by that stage of the war the Germans realised that it was pretty pointless to try and repair KTs, but why they still mounted the block I have no idea. Perhaps it was because they were in stock when the tank was built and they had nothing better to do with them?

Of course, by this stage, many German tanks left the factory with a full tank of fuel and were simply abandoned when it ran out. Another reason for no jack was probably that the service life of the tracks was longer than the anticipated life of the tank. The well photographed KT 222 from the Ardennes had a service life of around three weeks from when it was issued to when it was knocked out.

Regards

Rob
GeraldOwens
Visit this Community
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Sunday, July 09, 2017 - 09:18 PM UTC

Quoted Text

G'day Bob

The jack and block were deleted in about mid October 1944, although I have seen a pic of a KT with block but no jack.

Regards

Rob


The jack was rated at 20 tons, the tank weighed over seventy. It was deemed a pointless accessory, and was dropped (though some Jagdtiger crews disagreed, and stowed a loose jack on the engine deck).
 _GOTOTOP