I'm currently building a USMC Sherman (4th Marine Tank Battn.). The Italeri kit has the deep-wading gear exhaust stack with the opening forwards whereas the Osprey Modelling Manual 'M4 Sherman' model of the 5th Bttn tank shows this facing rearwards ( which for the exhaust would make more sense).
Which is correct?
Hosted by Darren Baker
Sherman deep wading gear
DaveCox
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: January 11, 2003
KitMaker: 4,307 posts
Armorama: 2,130 posts
Joined: January 11, 2003
KitMaker: 4,307 posts
Armorama: 2,130 posts
Posted: Monday, March 01, 2004 - 09:17 PM UTC
greatbrit
United Kingdom
Joined: May 14, 2003
KitMaker: 2,127 posts
Armorama: 1,217 posts
Joined: May 14, 2003
KitMaker: 2,127 posts
Armorama: 1,217 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 - 12:19 AM UTC
well im not 100% sure but most of the pics ive seen show them facing forwards
this is an M10, based on an M4A2 chassis
this i think is an M4A1
hope they help
cheers
joe
this is an M10, based on an M4A2 chassis
this i think is an M4A1
hope they help
cheers
joe
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 - 01:07 AM UTC
Quoted Text
...facing rearwards (which for the exhaust would make more sense).
Not true. When a tank comes off the landing craft and hits the water, the rear end is sitting in the deepest part of the sea. Also the rear is the heaviest since it has the engine located there. You would want the exhaust opening away from the deeper water, so it would face forward. Remember, as the tank travels on shore, the nose is pointed slightly up which tilts the tail back. You wouldn't want water washing into the exhaust trunk.
BTW, Joe's bottom photo isn't an M4A1. The M4A1 had the cast hull, it is most likely an early M4. Note the absense of a loader's hatch (where the circled star is) showing an early turret and the sharp, flat edges of the welded hull.
greatbrit
United Kingdom
Joined: May 14, 2003
KitMaker: 2,127 posts
Armorama: 1,217 posts
Joined: May 14, 2003
KitMaker: 2,127 posts
Armorama: 1,217 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 - 01:30 AM UTC
Quoted Text
[BTW, Joe's bottom photo isn't an M4A1. The M4A1 had the cast hull, it is most likely an early M4. Note the absense of a loader's hatch (where the circled star is) showing an early turret and the sharp, flat edges of the welded hull.
d'oh, sorry sabot is right. i meant early M4, as in the tamiya kit.
cheers
joe
DaveCox
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: January 11, 2003
KitMaker: 4,307 posts
Armorama: 2,130 posts
Joined: January 11, 2003
KitMaker: 4,307 posts
Armorama: 2,130 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 - 01:44 AM UTC
Many thanks Guys, both will face forwards.