Quoted Text
Best as in...??
The most fun?
The most accurate?
The most easiest to assemble? (that's not proper English me thinks, oh well...)
As the starter of the OOTB thread, I like the start of this thread, also. But, unlike my thread, I do think that this one DOES require some qualification, such as was identified in the quote above. I believe that the truly analogous question with respect to 'best', as compared to my thread, would have to be, which is the most accurate OOTB build. The reason I say this is because the reason that most of us do aftermarket parts, primarily photo etch, is to make the model more accurate, possible better detailed, but really, in essence, more accurate. This isn't my thread, of course, but I might prevail upon the starter of this one to clarify that the intent of 'best' in this case is, which is the most accurate (and throw in to a lesser extent, detailed) OOTB build you've ever done. If Lakota disagrees, please chime in!
One point I want to make, though. Unless you happen to be the often disparaged 'rivet counter' type of person, most of us would have a hard time being able to really say how accurate a model is. I know I can't. I can say what I think LOOKS most detailed, but that's opinion, whereas, most accurate should have some level of objectivity to it, in terms of dimensions, how many smaller parts are there to represent detail ( for example, I just learned this last week, from a post in Armorama, that Tiger 2 tanks had 2 fuel tank vent lines with tubing that ran over the side of the hull, which I'd never heard of previously, so a lack of those details wouldn't have been something that I even knew was adding to inaccuracy).