Prior to WWII it was used extensively in China, and also saw action at Khalkhin Gol. Deemed obsolete at the start of WWII, it was still used in the Philippines, Malaya, and Burma campaigns.
Cheers,
Tat
MrCompletely
Saitama-ken, Japan / 日本 Joined: February 12, 2016
KitMaker: 128 posts
Armorama: 120 posts
Actually this is NOT the first variant; the first had a rail running under the top track length, and the drivers position and hull M.G. positions were transposed.
"I've..seen things..you people wouldn't believe."
JSSVIII
Massachusetts, United States Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Looking forward to this release, some very interesting camo schemes available for this tank. Very different from the common scheme with the yellow stripes.
27-1025
North Carolina, United States Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Just to wander slightly OT here, but was there any particular reason why Japanese tanks tended to not have a coaxial machine gun, but instead mount one in the turret rear, such as on this or the Type 97? Seems like a pretty inefficient arrangement...
Damon.
vettejack
Florida, United States Joined: November 23, 2012
KitMaker: 1,277 posts
Armorama: 1,254 posts
While its nice to see another version of the Type 89, it seems that the aftermarket still has some catching up to do. Try and find metal tracks for the Type 89. I can't!