My M3A2 Bradley is finished now. It was converted from CC Lee Models copy of Tamiya M2A2 Bradley. I didn't use any aftermarket parts (except for MV lenses), but replaced some kit parts with ones from Academy, Tamiya and Dragon kits. I implemented most changes described in my article about accurizing Tamiya M2A2 kit http://vodnik.net/index_feat.htm, but not all of them.
Photos of my model are in My Gallery here: https://armorama.kitmaker.net/photos/showgallery.php?cat=12641&ppuser=2325.
Higher resolution versions of photos are also on my website, here: http://vodnik.net/index_gal.htm (scroll down the page to find Bradley gallery).
Here is just one example:
Any comments welcome
Best Regards,
Pawel
Hosted by Darren Baker
M3A2 Bradley CFV - finished!!!
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 06, 2004 - 05:36 AM UTC
animal
Joined: December 15, 2002
KitMaker: 4,503 posts
Armorama: 3,159 posts
KitMaker: 4,503 posts
Armorama: 3,159 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 06, 2004 - 05:40 AM UTC
BRAVO Pawel Another fantastic example of you talents. The finish is very realistic and the paint is flawless as always. You are the master of the NATO three color scheme. The stowage looks like it belongs and gives the appearance that it is attached to the vehicle realistically. Three cheers
SFC_StJohn
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 03, 2004
KitMaker: 128 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: January 03, 2004
KitMaker: 128 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 06, 2004 - 05:46 AM UTC
Genius, pure genius.....
Smoke86
Vermont, United States
Joined: February 20, 2004
KitMaker: 33 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: February 20, 2004
KitMaker: 33 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 06, 2004 - 02:55 PM UTC
Two things on this just made my jaw drop.
1. The Camo Screen Bag. The color is dead on it looks like someone took a bag of cammo screen and shrunk it.
2. Smoe grenade caps. Some out 'poped out' in a point, some look like they are pop inward. Surperb attention to detail.
Just spectactular to look at. Nice job
1. The Camo Screen Bag. The color is dead on it looks like someone took a bag of cammo screen and shrunk it.
2. Smoe grenade caps. Some out 'poped out' in a point, some look like they are pop inward. Surperb attention to detail.
Just spectactular to look at. Nice job
garrybeebe
Oregon, United States
Joined: November 24, 2003
KitMaker: 1,969 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: November 24, 2003
KitMaker: 1,969 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 06, 2004 - 03:23 PM UTC
Howdy Pawel,
Thats an awsome Build of the Bradley ! You got every thing just right. :-)
Cheers,
Garry
Thats an awsome Build of the Bradley ! You got every thing just right. :-)
Cheers,
Garry
shonen_red
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: February 20, 2003
KitMaker: 5,762 posts
Armorama: 2,283 posts
Joined: February 20, 2003
KitMaker: 5,762 posts
Armorama: 2,283 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 06, 2004 - 08:51 PM UTC
I'm no armor addict (but I love Brads :-) ) and it certainly looks cool at every angle! This thing is surely an accurize scale model of the Brad. Love it! Congratulations!
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2004 - 12:37 AM UTC
Thanks everyone!
It is really great feeling to see that my work is appreciated!
But at the same time I'm very disappointed at you! I forgot to add two extremely important parts and no-one noticed! Without them the model looks just wrong!
#:-) OK, I'm just kidding - I indeed forgot to add two tiny details, and only noticed that on photos (that's why I like to photograph my models - it is usually easier to spot such things on a photo). The work platform on the left side of the hull should be secured to the hull with two straps. I made holes in the platform and attached tie-downs to the armor, but forgot to add straps! It has been corrected this morning
Cheers,
Pawel
It is really great feeling to see that my work is appreciated!
But at the same time I'm very disappointed at you! I forgot to add two extremely important parts and no-one noticed! Without them the model looks just wrong!
#:-) OK, I'm just kidding - I indeed forgot to add two tiny details, and only noticed that on photos (that's why I like to photograph my models - it is usually easier to spot such things on a photo). The work platform on the left side of the hull should be secured to the hull with two straps. I made holes in the platform and attached tie-downs to the armor, but forgot to add straps! It has been corrected this morning
Cheers,
Pawel
barron
Virginia, United States
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 666 posts
Armorama: 598 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 666 posts
Armorama: 598 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2004 - 01:03 AM UTC
That Bradley looks like it just came off of the ranges at graf. Outstaning job
SS-74
Vatican City
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2004 - 01:12 AM UTC
Wow! Looked real good Lord Vondik. This is amazing stuff. I like to see if not too much trouble of course a dead-on head shot of the whole bradley, because last time in the rivet review, I pointed out the tracks are a little cantered outwards, like to see how ya corrected it. Looked real nice!
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2004 - 01:43 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I like to see if not too much trouble of course a dead-on head shot of the whole bradley, because last time in the rivet review, I pointed out the tracks are a little cantered outwards, like to see how ya corrected it. Looked real nice!
Well, you will NOT see a dead-on head shot of my Bradley
The reason is that after trying to correct the track position, I realized that I superglued sprockets at a slight angle, instead of perfectly parallel to the hull and it is impossible to correct it now. This makes it very hard to set the track perfectly straight. It is temporarily possible, but flexibility of the vinyl causes them to return to slightly cantered postion with time... But as it is only (hardly) visible if you look at the model head-on, I decided to live with it. Nobody's perfect, right?
Best Regards,
Pawel
scoccia
Milano, Italy
Joined: September 02, 2002
KitMaker: 2,606 posts
Armorama: 1,721 posts
Joined: September 02, 2002
KitMaker: 2,606 posts
Armorama: 1,721 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2004 - 02:36 AM UTC
Not an expert, but it looks absolutely stunning. Bravo Pawel!!!
Ciao
Ciao
cardinal
Visayas, Philippines
Joined: October 05, 2003
KitMaker: 1,008 posts
Armorama: 469 posts
Joined: October 05, 2003
KitMaker: 1,008 posts
Armorama: 469 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2004 - 02:39 AM UTC
Fantastic job there Pawel. I love the weathering on your Bradley.
BlackThor_06
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: August 12, 2003
KitMaker: 200 posts
Armorama: 114 posts
Joined: August 12, 2003
KitMaker: 200 posts
Armorama: 114 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2004 - 04:00 AM UTC
It's magnificent.
Been keeping an eye on your progress (and saving the images for future reference) and I am really, really impressed.
I always prefer the CARC scheme over hte desert scheme - and your model is the perfect example.
Great job!
BT6
Been keeping an eye on your progress (and saving the images for future reference) and I am really, really impressed.
I always prefer the CARC scheme over hte desert scheme - and your model is the perfect example.
Great job!
BT6
BroAbrams
Washington, United States
Joined: October 02, 2002
KitMaker: 1,546 posts
Armorama: 1,081 posts
Joined: October 02, 2002
KitMaker: 1,546 posts
Armorama: 1,081 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2004 - 05:56 AM UTC
Pawel, I have only two complaints. First is that I saw it on Missing-Lynx first and here second, and the other is that the pictures don't show the anti-skid surface at all. I thought the anti-skid was phenominal and the pictures don't do it justice. The whole model is just outstanding and I hope you get some pretty ribbons to show off for it.
Rob
Rob
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2004 - 06:43 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Pawel, I have only two complaints. First is that I saw it on Missing-Lynx first and here second,
This just proves that you check forums in the wrong order Photos were on Armorama several hours before I posted them on ML and Hyperscale.
Quoted Text
and the other is that the pictures don't show the anti-skid surface at all. I thought the anti-skid was phenominal and the pictures don't do it justice. The whole model is just outstanding and I hope you get some pretty ribbons to show off for it.
It is still very prominent on the model, particularly with the MIG pigment, which adhere very well to the rough surface. It is true that on photos taken in very strong sunlight, the effect is not noticeable. It is best visible on this picture: http://www.vodnik.republika.pl/pages/m3a2/m3a2cfv-08.jpg
Cheers,
Pawel
Pnzr-Cmdr
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: July 16, 2003
KitMaker: 483 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: July 16, 2003
KitMaker: 483 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2004 - 12:09 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Well, you will NOT see a dead-on head shot of my Bradley
The reason is that after trying to correct the track position, I realized that I superglued sprockets at a slight angle, instead of perfectly parallel to the hull and it is impossible to correct it now. This makes it very hard to set the track perfectly straight. It is temporarily possible, but flexibility of the vinyl causes them to return to slightly cantered postion with time... But as it is only (hardly) visible if you look at the model head-on, I decided to live with it. Nobody's perfect, right?
Best Regards,
Pawel
hehehe i thought you blamed that on the focal length... lol
it looks great btw. bravp
BroAbrams
Washington, United States
Joined: October 02, 2002
KitMaker: 1,546 posts
Armorama: 1,081 posts
Joined: October 02, 2002
KitMaker: 1,546 posts
Armorama: 1,081 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2004 - 12:27 PM UTC
I forgot to ask, Pawel, how did you mask the small details? Was it done with a stretchy tape or with Micro-Mask, because regular tape isn't working, it won't stay square.
Rob
Rob
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2004 - 08:54 PM UTC
Quoted Text
hehehe i thought you blamed that on the focal length... lol
And it was in 90% true - the effect was highly exaggerated by the short lens I used. As I wrote above - it is really hardly visible now on the model - I think I'll take one photo with long lens from the distance to show how big (or rather how small) the problem really is.
Rgds,
Pawel
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2004 - 09:07 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I forgot to ask, Pawel, how did you mask the small details? Was it done with a stretchy tape or with Micro-Mask, because regular tape isn't working, it won't stay square.
For the camouflage application I used masks only to cover vision blocks made earlier (I used small rectangles of Tamiya tape) and lights (with liquid mask - Humbrol Maskol). To paint wheels/tires I also used masks made of Tamiya tape - I cut circles using Olfa Compass Cutter. Everything else "camo-wise" was painted "free-hand".
To paint various details (like canvas cover on TOW launcher or above the gun barrel), I also used pieces of Tamiya tape and liquid mask.
Rgds,
Pawel
sgtreef
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: March 01, 2002
KitMaker: 6,043 posts
Armorama: 4,347 posts
Joined: March 01, 2002
KitMaker: 6,043 posts
Armorama: 4,347 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 07, 2004 - 10:37 PM UTC
That is one sweet model Vodnik nice overall effect of both weathering and painting surpeb job two beers for ya!!
warriorFSO
North Carolina, United States
Joined: March 10, 2004
KitMaker: 38 posts
Armorama: 30 posts
Joined: March 10, 2004
KitMaker: 38 posts
Armorama: 30 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 - 12:02 PM UTC
Awesome work Pawel,
I spent almost 2 years around Brads in Europe, and i had trouble decearning your pics from real-life. Amazing, and insprirational.
I spent almost 2 years around Brads in Europe, and i had trouble decearning your pics from real-life. Amazing, and insprirational.
377
Kentucky, United States
Joined: December 31, 2003
KitMaker: 30 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: December 31, 2003
KitMaker: 30 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 - 12:22 PM UTC
Pawel,
Great looking Bradley! The final pictures make it look like the real deal, just like everyone says. I have a couple of questions. You used MV Lenses for the headlights, which size lense did you use? My second question is over in the In progress forum you should pictures of it right after you had washed it. What color did you use as a wash? It seemed to be very subtle and blended everything together very well. I have been building a ODS M2A2 and have been greatly helped and inspired by your work. I am almost finished with the lower hull but have run into problems locating pictures of the ODS driver's hatch and assembly. Have you run across any good pictures of it during your research?
377
Great looking Bradley! The final pictures make it look like the real deal, just like everyone says. I have a couple of questions. You used MV Lenses for the headlights, which size lense did you use? My second question is over in the In progress forum you should pictures of it right after you had washed it. What color did you use as a wash? It seemed to be very subtle and blended everything together very well. I have been building a ODS M2A2 and have been greatly helped and inspired by your work. I am almost finished with the lower hull but have run into problems locating pictures of the ODS driver's hatch and assembly. Have you run across any good pictures of it during your research?
377
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 10, 2004 - 08:25 PM UTC
Quoted Text
You used MV Lenses for the headlights, which size lense did you use?
I used .086" lenses. But I'm not sure if they will fit Tamiya Bradley as well as they fit Lee kit, as headlights in Lee kit seem to be a bit smaller than in original Tamiya one.
Quoted Text
My second question is over in the In progress forum you should pictures of it right after you had washed it. What color did you use as a wash? It seemed to be very subtle and blended everything together very well.
On NATO black areas of camouflage I used black oil paint wash and on all other areas I used a mix of Burnt Umber and black oil paints. I thinned oil paint heavilly with turpentine.
Quoted Text
I am almost finished with the lower hull but have run into problems locating pictures of the ODS driver's hatch and assembly. Have you run across any good pictures of it during your research?
Unfortunately not - as you can see in my article I had too use less then perfect photo there...
Rgds,
Pawel
SS-74
Vatican City
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Posted: Monday, March 15, 2004 - 06:49 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextI forgot to ask, Pawel, how did you mask the small details? Was it done with a stretchy tape or with Micro-Mask, because regular tape isn't working, it won't stay square.
For the camouflage application I used masks only to cover vision blocks made earlier (I used small rectangles of Tamiya tape) and lights (with liquid mask - Humbrol Maskol). To paint wheels/tires I also used masks made of Tamiya tape - I cut circles using Olfa Compass Cutter. Everything else "camo-wise" was painted "free-hand".
To paint various details (like canvas cover on TOW launcher or above the gun barrel), I also used pieces of Tamiya tape and liquid mask.
Rgds,
Pawel
Hi Lord Von,
How's the new photos from afar coming along?
Tobar
Arizona, United States
Joined: October 17, 2002
KitMaker: 192 posts
Armorama: 96 posts
Joined: October 17, 2002
KitMaker: 192 posts
Armorama: 96 posts
Posted: Monday, March 15, 2004 - 06:59 AM UTC
VODNIK,
I am absolutly envious of your work... I have been building a Tamiya M2A2 kit myself and
was 80% on the build when I stumbled across your articlal on how to update this Tamiya kit.
I tryed to implement as much as possable, as my skill would allow, onto my kit. It is better
than what It was before but not to the quality of yours....
Seems everyone who has posted is in aggreement , This is quality work with excellent detal to boot... "This Buds for you "
One question , "What process was used for your mud stains on this Bradley?"
I've bookmarked your page and will be a routine visitor....
I am absolutly envious of your work... I have been building a Tamiya M2A2 kit myself and
was 80% on the build when I stumbled across your articlal on how to update this Tamiya kit.
I tryed to implement as much as possable, as my skill would allow, onto my kit. It is better
than what It was before but not to the quality of yours....
Seems everyone who has posted is in aggreement , This is quality work with excellent detal to boot... "This Buds for you "
One question , "What process was used for your mud stains on this Bradley?"
I've bookmarked your page and will be a routine visitor....