Came across this one, while crawling through my library.
Unfortunately, I do not know its origin. To be honest, I'm surprised the panzer I could propel a panzer III turret.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Pz.III Turret on Pz.I A Chassis
retiredyank
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 26, 2017 - 08:17 AM UTC
TopSmith
Washington, United States
Joined: August 09, 2002
KitMaker: 1,742 posts
Armorama: 1,658 posts
Joined: August 09, 2002
KitMaker: 1,742 posts
Armorama: 1,658 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 26, 2017 - 08:22 AM UTC
It may not have been traversable. A cheap jagdepanzer 1. Maybe a training tank.
retiredyank
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 26, 2017 - 08:32 AM UTC
I think it is, in fact for training. The hull mg is missing. Then again, they may not have had enough room for the operator.
brekinapez
Georgia, United States
Joined: July 26, 2013
KitMaker: 2,272 posts
Armorama: 1,860 posts
Joined: July 26, 2013
KitMaker: 2,272 posts
Armorama: 1,860 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 26, 2017 - 08:34 AM UTC
Are you sure this isn't a photoshop job?
retiredyank
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 26, 2017 - 09:27 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Are you sure this isn't a photoshop job?
I can't be certain. However, I did notice the color difference, between the turret and hull. This particular photo was not found, in any of the books that I have.
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 26, 2017 - 09:56 AM UTC
The last time I saw the picture it was labeled a turret trainer. They used the obsolete chassis for turret familarization training in a moving vehicle without using an actual tank. Similarly they had turretless hulls for driver training.
Makes as much sense as the US turret trainer of the time which was the gun mount on a platform that two guys would pitch back and forth to simulate a moving tank.
This set up would also be useful to train tank commander and driver coordination. The TC and driver's positions would be as the service vehicle and this would train tank commanders how to direct a driver in the hull from the TC cupola.
Makes as much sense as the US turret trainer of the time which was the gun mount on a platform that two guys would pitch back and forth to simulate a moving tank.
This set up would also be useful to train tank commander and driver coordination. The TC and driver's positions would be as the service vehicle and this would train tank commanders how to direct a driver in the hull from the TC cupola.
retiredyank
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 26, 2017 - 10:48 AM UTC
Quoted Text
The last time I saw the picture it was labeled a turret trainer. They used the obsolete chassis for turret familarization training in a moving vehicle without using an actual tank. Similarly they had turretless hulls for driver training.
Makes as much sense as the US turret trainer of the time which was the gun mount on a platform that two guys would pitch back and forth to simulate a moving tank.
This set up would also be useful to train tank commander and driver coordination. The TC and driver's positions would be as the service vehicle and this would train tank commanders how to direct a driver in the hull from the TC cupola.
Thank you. That was very enlightening. That must have been some serious shoe-horning. BTW - I have a few photos of turretless trainers(III's and IV's of course).