Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
Review
Dragon: IDF Magach 3 w/ ERAPosted: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 - 06:13 PM UTC
Sebastian Schoof shares with us a review of the IDF Magach 3 with ERA from Dragon Models in 1/35th scale.
Read the Review
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
jwest21
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 - 08:56 PM UTC
I have this kit half built- I'm scared to read the review
seanmcandrews
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: May 09, 2009
KitMaker: 561 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Joined: May 09, 2009
KitMaker: 561 posts
Armorama: 553 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 - 09:09 PM UTC
It's a video review and I couldn't determine why he wrote that it doesn't include IDF decals as he shows them in the video.
Sean
Sean
jwest21
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 - 09:22 PM UTC
Quoted Text
It's a video review and I couldn't determine why he wrote that it doesn't include IDF decals as he shows them in the video.
Sean
I was wondering it too- I can't watch the video at work, though. It DEFINITELY comes with a sheet of IDF-looking markings. Maybe he meant they are fictional or for a regular Magach 3 or something?
Schoof
Noord-Brabant, Netherlands
Joined: November 22, 2016
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Joined: November 22, 2016
KitMaker: 3 posts
Armorama: 3 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 31, 2017 - 11:38 PM UTC
Sorry gents! I mistakenly put in that there are no IDF markings. They are there.
I had just done a back to back review of the Magach and the Takom Tiran 4 and that one didn't have the IDF decals.
Again sorry for the mix up
I had just done a back to back review of the Magach and the Takom Tiran 4 and that one didn't have the IDF decals.
Again sorry for the mix up
jwest21
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 - 12:03 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Sorry gents! I mistakenly put in that there are no IDF markings. They are there.
I had just done a back to back review of the Magach and the Takom Tiran 4 and that one didn't have the IDF decals.
Again sorry for the mix up
No problem. Thanks for the review!
JSSVIII
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Joined: March 28, 2007
KitMaker: 1,169 posts
Armorama: 1,067 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 - 03:38 AM UTC
Thanks for the review, I'll probably be picking this one up. I have the Legend conversion, but I need a base kit anyway, so why not start with this one. I'll use whichever parts seem to be better as I go.
jwest21
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 - 05:54 AM UTC
so would this be Sanai grey 73 or 82?
ReluctantRenegade
Wien, Austria
Joined: March 09, 2016
KitMaker: 2,408 posts
Armorama: 2,300 posts
Joined: March 09, 2016
KitMaker: 2,408 posts
Armorama: 2,300 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 - 12:34 PM UTC
Quoted Text
so would this be Sanai grey 73 or 82?
I guess '82 would be more appropriate as the ERA blocks were developed in the late '70s.
BTW...'50th Anniversary the Six Day War'? That's like putting 'Great Patriotic War Series' on a T-54 box...
jwest21
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 - 07:34 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted Textso would this be Sanai grey 73 or 82?
I guess '82 would be more appropriate as the ERA blocks were developed in the late '70s.
BTW...'50th Anniversary the Six Day War'? That's like putting 'Great Patriotic War Series' on a T-54 box...
I think Dragon was confused- the caption on the decal placement guide for both options says "1967"
ReluctantRenegade
Wien, Austria
Joined: March 09, 2016
KitMaker: 2,408 posts
Armorama: 2,300 posts
Joined: March 09, 2016
KitMaker: 2,408 posts
Armorama: 2,300 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 - 09:11 PM UTC
What does that say about the overall accuracy of the model...?
jwest21
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Joined: October 16, 2006
KitMaker: 3,374 posts
Armorama: 3,126 posts
Posted: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 - 09:25 PM UTC
Yeah, Dragon has really went downhill with accuracy
Posted: Saturday, November 04, 2017 - 10:59 PM UTC
Thanks for the review
avenue
Philippines
Joined: May 25, 2013
KitMaker: 544 posts
Armorama: 542 posts
Joined: May 25, 2013
KitMaker: 544 posts
Armorama: 542 posts
Posted: Sunday, November 05, 2017 - 02:07 PM UTC
big problem, the commander hatch is mold in single pieces
avenue
Philippines
Joined: May 25, 2013
KitMaker: 544 posts
Armorama: 542 posts
Joined: May 25, 2013
KitMaker: 544 posts
Armorama: 542 posts
Posted: Tuesday, November 07, 2017 - 12:24 PM UTC
Dragon simple refuse to listen !