_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Axis - WWII
Armor and ground forces of the Axis forces during World War II.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Sturmtiger
Headhunter506
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: December 01, 2007
KitMaker: 1,575 posts
Armorama: 1,509 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 25, 2017 - 12:46 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


At least RFM is attempting to add something new to the mix. It can't be any worse than the Tamiya version.




Spot the self-contradiction !

David



My thought wasn't articulated clearly, that's all. The Tamiya version was a good kit for its time. So, the RFM version can't be any worse than that. That statement isn't a self-cotradiction, just a fact.
ChrisK89
Visit this Community
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: June 04, 2015
KitMaker: 80 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 25, 2017 - 01:18 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


do the other newer kits have PE clamps/clasps like the RFMs? Do they have metal tow cable? Or wingnuts on the sprues? No they don't and that whats makes the RFM Tiger a better detailed one.



Really? Because "made of metal" is not the same thing as "detailed".

I'll take a look at the parts that you mentioned. Thank you.

David





"made of metal" means that the cable is seperate to the clamps which means vice versa more detailed clamps and the choice to model the cables a different way (hanging somewhere, leaving them off etc.)

Really David come on.. don't play dumb on me. I know you are working with/for Dragon but you are a modeller, too (i guess) and you should know what the important parts/details on these kits are!
Do you want all your kits/tigers 100% new and with all tools, cables etc. in place? I don't and many other modellers i know don't want that either.
The way Dragon is moulding their kits right now it's not possible without surgery/aftermarket. With RFM Tigers you can do it OoB.
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 25, 2017 - 08:01 AM UTC
Several months back I asked a couple questions about a certain era of Tigers, and was pretty much ignored by the experts. Then outta the blue comes one David Byrden. His two or three replies were very helpful, and very respectful. The answers actually were not exactly what I wanted to read, but also very useful.

Now I've pretty much quit buying Tigers except for Dragon, RFM, Takom & Meng (latter two are Tiger II's). A lot of it is because that no matter which one you buy, you later feel like a fool for buying it. I probably will buy the Sturmtiger. Then read where you all have found 15 fatal flaws in the kit!!
gary
Kevlar06
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: March 15, 2009
KitMaker: 3,670 posts
Armorama: 2,052 posts
Posted: Saturday, November 25, 2017 - 08:55 AM UTC
Look guys, if we could get back on topic which is who's releasing the next Sturmtiger-- not which Tiger is best, it would be good. I have three Sturmtigers on my shelf of doom-- an Italeri, a Tamiya, and an AFV club. None of which are 100% accurate, but if I had to go with the best Sturmtiger in the bunch, I'd say it was the Tamiya version-- the caveat is I've had to buy Eduard interior/exterior PE, Fruil tracks, Eduard Zimmerit PE, Lion Roar PE and LR Zimmerit rollers, etc. etc., to get it semi-accurate. Now even DN is making Sturmtiger "ambush scheme" masks too, which I suppose I'll have to buy. If the RFM offering can keep me from having to use the "add on stuff" I'll be happy. Dragon doesn't count in this discussion since they don't have one. But I think we should wait and see what the RFM offering looks like and compare it to the other three offerings before throwing stones at it--or we're just comparing apples to oranges.
VR, Russ
 _GOTOTOP