_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Number of links on Sherman tracks?
Vierville
Visit this Community
Gauteng, South Africa
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 02, 2017 - 12:59 PM UTC
Hello everyone.

I'm trying to find a definitive answer on how many track links were there per side on a standard M4 Sherman and 'long' M4A4 (Firefly or Sherman V)?

The reason is that I have an Asuka Sherman Firefly and I want to get a set of Bronco workable tracks but am not sure if there are enough links provided in one set for the longer Firefly or if there are only enough for the standard M4 Sherman?

I've researched a bit and it seems the answer is anywhere from 83 to 88 links per side for a Firefly while for the standard length M4 it seems to be 78 to 82ish?


Thanks!
gastec
Visit this Community
Auckland, New Zealand
Joined: February 03, 2014
KitMaker: 1,042 posts
Armorama: 871 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 02, 2017 - 01:13 PM UTC
According to the Son of Sherman Vol 1 book:

HVSS Suspension
Standard hull (T6, M4 M4A1, M4A3, M4A3E2, M10 M36, M7 and M2)- 79 per side
Long hull (M4A4 and M4A6) - 83 per side

Gary

Vierville
Visit this Community
Gauteng, South Africa
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 02, 2017 - 07:17 PM UTC
Thank you!
thathaway3
Visit this Community
Michigan, United States
Joined: September 10, 2004
KitMaker: 1,610 posts
Armorama: 684 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - 12:46 AM UTC
Be careful.

It is entirely possible that the ACTUAL number of links on the prototype vehicle and the number of links required in a specific After Market set MAY not be the same. The A/M links would have to be PRECISELY to scale and the slightest variance +/- could result in the count being different.

I built some tracks using the actual count from the TM on several Cold War US SP Artillery vehicles and the brand of A/M I was using was evidently JUST slightly oversized and the completed track was about 5-6 links too long.

Your method is a good one to make sure you're PROBABLY OK with the number needed, but if you have a "rubber band" track that came with the kit and it provides the right length to properly fit the vehicle, use that as a LENGTH (and not necessarily a "count") guide in building your track.
Vierville
Visit this Community
Gauteng, South Africa
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - 12:54 AM UTC
Hi Tom. Thank you for that very good advice. I appreciate the benefit of your experience.

The AM set that I have ordered has 192 links in total, which works out to 96 links available per side. So I'm hoping that even if the number of links don't tally up with how many are on the kit's rubber band tracks, at least there should be enough extra links to still have enough?

Thank you once again for taking the time to post that advice!
HeavyArty
Visit this Community
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - 12:54 AM UTC
I will second what Tom says above. With models, it is usually "however many it takes", as opposed to the same number as the actual vehicle. Rarely will the number be even close to what the actual vehicle took/takes.
tankmodeler
#417
Visit this Community
Ontario, Canada
Joined: March 01, 2004
KitMaker: 3,123 posts
Armorama: 2,539 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - 02:17 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I will second what Tom says above. With models, it is usually "however many it takes", as opposed to the same number as the actual vehicle. Rarely will the number be even close to what the actual vehicle took/takes.


The actual number of links also being variable due to wear on the various components. Link counts can vary by a couple each side for most tanks depending on the state of the parts.

Then there is the effect of the track tensioning device (whatever it is for each vehicle) which is meant to account for the wear, to a degree, and then you take out a link and readjust.

"Use as many as required" is the best advice, noting that it's more important, for Shermans, to not have much sag at all in the top run of track. If you use the right number and the track sags more than about a scale inch between return rollers (.029" in 1/35), then take out a link or adjust the idler to reduce that slack.

Paul
Vierville
Visit this Community
Gauteng, South Africa
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - 02:31 AM UTC
Hi Paul,

Thank you very much for your advice...I'm really learning a lot here! It's good, in a way, that there is no set number of links in real life too. Makes any discrepancies with a model much less inaccurate. Thanks for sharing your knowledge!
RobinNilsson
Staff MemberTOS Moderator
KITMAKER NETWORK
Visit this Community
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - 03:04 AM UTC
An "accurate" track goes all the way around with the correct amount of track sag/slack.
If the "correct" number of links doesn't reach all the way around it is definitely "inaccurate", the same goes for too much sag/slack
/ Robin
barkingdigger
Staff MemberAssociate Editor
ARMORAMA
#013
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: June 20, 2008
KitMaker: 3,981 posts
Armorama: 3,403 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - 03:59 AM UTC
Getting back to the original question, the Bronco sets should have more than enough for even the M4A4 long hull, with some left over.
Vierville
Visit this Community
Gauteng, South Africa
Joined: April 05, 2014
KitMaker: 384 posts
Armorama: 372 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 05, 2017 - 11:01 AM UTC
Thanks Tom! That's good news! And thank you to everybody who has added their advice and knowledge!
 _GOTOTOP