News
Tamiya: Upcoming Kits
tatbaqui
News Writer![KitMaker Network Subscriber](../../images/global/km_subscriber_small.gif)
#040
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: May 06, 2007
KitMaker: 2,713 posts
Armorama: 2,451 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 27, 2018 - 05:28 AM UTC
![](https://photos.kitmaker.net/news/27882/Presentation1.jpg)
Tamiya is set to present its kits on the M3 Stuart and Wespe at the Nuremberg Toy Fair 2018.
Read the Full News StoryIf you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Arizona, United States
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 27, 2018 - 06:30 AM UTC
Can't wait to see the M3!
I found a nifty feature on the forums called HIDE USER.
I was going to try it on myself and go stealth, but it only works on other users.
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: October 14, 2013
KitMaker: 318 posts
Armorama: 313 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 27, 2018 - 06:55 AM UTC
Darn, by "Late Production" I thought that they meant the A3 variant!
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 27, 2018 - 07:39 AM UTC
If it's an M3 late production why are showing a photo of an early production?
Early should be the riveted/welded slab sided turret, middle the horseshoe with cupola and late the horseshoe with double hatches as in the M3 hybrid?
All the other Stuarts are covered by AFV-club which are really definitive kits. Why want a new kit from Tamiya where a definitive kit already exists?
"The only thing a man should take seriously is the fact that nothing should be taken seriously."
Samuel Butler, Victorian satirist
Steve Willoughby
Solomon Islands
Joined: September 26, 2015
KitMaker: 113 posts
Armorama: 106 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 27, 2018 - 09:38 AM UTC
Quoted Text
If it's an M3 late production why are showing a photo of an early production?
Early should be the riveted/welded slab sided turret, middle the horseshoe with cupola and late the horseshoe with double hatches as in the M3 hybrid?
All the other Stuarts are covered by AFV-club which are really definitive kits. Why want a new kit from Tamiya where a definitive kit already exists?
It's a placeholder image. The TamiyaBlog is not officially affiliated with Tamiya and not everyone there is an expert or even familiar with all things military.
The AFV Club T-34 series are perhaps the definitive T-34 kits these days but I'm happy when I see other companies do their own, especially considering cost and availability. Not every store stocks the same brands at the same prices.
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: November 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,138 posts
Armorama: 953 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 27, 2018 - 01:20 PM UTC
The Wespe is more than likely a re-pop with different figures or something. It will be interesting to see if the tank is totally new tool or will it use elements from the 1974 early kit?
Madrid, Spain / España
Joined: July 08, 2006
KitMaker: 146 posts
Armorama: 128 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 27, 2018 - 05:11 PM UTC
I think M3 Late is with round turret
Madrid, Spain / España
Joined: July 08, 2006
KitMaker: 146 posts
Armorama: 128 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 27, 2018 - 05:13 PM UTC
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 27, 2018 - 05:28 PM UTC
The Pzkpfw II F is from 1974, the Marder II from not long after. The Wespe was an all new tool from 1994. It shares no parts with the aged Pzkpfw II F/G kit just as the Panzer II C Tamiya did shares nothing but a the logo on the box with the ancient F/G
You know bloggers really should pay closer attention to placeholder images. Makes them look careless. Why should I trust a blogger who doesn't bother to properly choose something like That? What other sourced haven't they properly vetted?
"The only thing a man should take seriously is the fact that nothing should be taken seriously."
Samuel Butler, Victorian satirist
Steve Willoughby
Georgia, United States
Joined: July 26, 2013
KitMaker: 2,272 posts
Armorama: 1,860 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 27, 2018 - 06:51 PM UTC
The Wespe may be from 1994 but it is still missing the parts that attach to the interior; you can even see the alignment marks for the righthand panel in the instructions yet still nothing to put on them.
They need to address that if they want me to buy one. My idea of a fun build is NOT having to fix the same mistakes over and over.
On the Campaign Trail:
Tank Destroyer 2020
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: November 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,138 posts
Armorama: 953 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 28, 2018 - 05:27 AM UTC
I said "tank" not SPG, referring to the original Tamiya early M3. The Wespe, as stated by others is from 1994..and yes, suffers from a bit of a barren interior. Too bad, it's otherwise pretty good. Much better than the Alan one anyway!
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: November 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,138 posts
Armorama: 953 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 28, 2018 - 05:27 AM UTC
Alabama, United States
Joined: September 22, 2008
KitMaker: 476 posts
Armorama: 447 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 28, 2018 - 05:31 AM UTC
I see they also have a motorized 1/16 Pz IV J. I would buy one but I'm sure it's pretty close to a mortgage payment in price.
Removed by original poster on 05/13/19 - 21:51:08 (GMT).
Manitoba, Canada
Joined: January 03, 2016
KitMaker: 3,791 posts
Armorama: 3,778 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 28, 2018 - 06:36 AM UTC
I appreciate Tamiya's excellent engineering allowing great fit with no instruction issues, but I find myself cringing at their repackaged Italeri kits and their price-point on kits like their Nashorn kit are hard to handle. As to the Wespe kit,, yes I wish that there was more to the interior and that the figures included are pretty, well, basic, but no one else seems to be rushing to fill the demand. Odd that Dragon, the maker of all versions for everyone, hasn't used their Pz II kit to offer one yet.
Drenthe, Netherlands
Joined: October 30, 2010
KitMaker: 150 posts
Armorama: 129 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 28, 2018 - 05:21 PM UTC
The Dragon Pz.II series is nowhere near the finesse of the Tamiya kit. Even this 1994 kit is a juwel imho. It didn't really need a rerelease but oh well. The M3 needed a re-tool, I am more interested in the M5A1 (the afv club kit is super nice but Tamiya building concept/engineering/finesse is my preferred option) and an M8 HMC with nice ammo trailer would be my dream wish of all the tanks using this chassis, but Tamiya-San chose this kit, so better be happy with this!
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 28, 2018 - 06:36 PM UTC
One great thing about the old M3 was all seperate lift handles. I hope a new one isn't like their recent Shermans and just have a bunch of ridges.
I figure the Wespe will at least have new figures and markings.
"The only thing a man should take seriously is the fact that nothing should be taken seriously."
Samuel Butler, Victorian satirist
Steve Willoughby
Missouri, United States
Joined: November 24, 2008
KitMaker: 93 posts
Armorama: 81 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 28, 2018 - 08:35 PM UTC
Tamiya has been adding figures to the recent new releases, so they will probably just fill up the Wespe interior with three or four new figures.
Oregon, United States
Joined: December 08, 2005
KitMaker: 556 posts
Armorama: 433 posts
Posted: Sunday, January 28, 2018 - 08:47 PM UTC
I hope they use new tracks on that M3
A veteran - whether active duty, retired, or national guard or reserve -- is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a blank check made payable to "The United States of America," for an amount of "up to and including my life."
European Union
Joined: January 28, 2015
KitMaker: 2,099 posts
Armorama: 1,920 posts
Posted: Monday, January 29, 2018 - 02:59 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Why want a new kit from Tamiya where a definitive kit already exists?
The Academy version really isn't the definitive kit of the Non-A3 M3
Never gonna' give EU up, never gonna' let EU down.
Ontario, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2012
KitMaker: 2,275 posts
Armorama: 2,233 posts
Posted: Monday, January 29, 2018 - 10:49 PM UTC
tamiya is ok...they are made for impatient people.
Georgia, United States
Joined: July 26, 2013
KitMaker: 2,272 posts
Armorama: 1,860 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 - 01:12 AM UTC
Quoted Text
tamiya is ok...they are made for impatient people.
lol
On the Campaign Trail:
Tank Destroyer 2020
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 - 03:09 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted Text
Why want a new kit from Tamiya where a definitive kit already exists?
The Academy version really isn't the definitive kit of the Non-A3 M3
I was referring to the AFV-CLUB M5A1 which is what the previous post was wishing Tamiya to do. I thought that was odd since the Afv-club M5A1 is considered definitive. The Academy Stuarts by comparison are sub-standard. Like their Sheridan I built them just to have one and kept away from reference materials to avoid long drawn out correction projects.
These days I prefer to build rather than rr-master flawed kits. So much easier on my stress level.
"The only thing a man should take seriously is the fact that nothing should be taken seriously."
Samuel Butler, Victorian satirist
Steve Willoughby
Removed by original poster on 01/31/18 - 12:00:56 (GMT).
tatbaqui
News Writer![KitMaker Network Subscriber](../../images/global/km_subscriber_small.gif)
#040
Metro Manila, Philippines
Joined: May 06, 2007
KitMaker: 2,713 posts
Armorama: 2,451 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 30, 2018 - 04:49 PM UTC