Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
News
Dragon: MGM-52 Lance Missilevaranusk
Managing Editor
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: July 04, 2013
KitMaker: 1,288 posts
Armorama: 942 posts
Joined: July 04, 2013
KitMaker: 1,288 posts
Armorama: 942 posts
Posted: Monday, March 12, 2018 - 01:53 PM UTC
Following last year's Dragon M752 Lance surface-to-surface missile launcher system on a tracked chassis,now they release a short/medium-range MGM-52 Lance missile mounted on a single-axle trailer.
Read the Full News Story
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
RobinNilsson
TOS Moderator
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Monday, March 12, 2018 - 02:10 PM UTC
Cool!
I presume that none of the faults on the launcher parts for the tracked version have been corrected. There is aftermarket for those faults ...
I wonder if they managed to get the trailer chassis right though...
/ Robin
I presume that none of the faults on the launcher parts for the tracked version have been corrected. There is aftermarket for those faults ...
I wonder if they managed to get the trailer chassis right though...
/ Robin
retiredyank
Arkansas, United States
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Joined: June 29, 2009
KitMaker: 11,610 posts
Armorama: 7,843 posts
Posted: Monday, March 12, 2018 - 02:12 PM UTC
I'm happy to see all of these missiles. I would be willing to shell out the cash for a Sergeant, on its mobile launcher.
tanknick22
United States
Joined: February 19, 2009
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 1,100 posts
Joined: February 19, 2009
KitMaker: 1,139 posts
Armorama: 1,100 posts
Posted: Monday, March 12, 2018 - 02:50 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Cool!
I presume that none of the faults on the launcher parts for the tracked version have been corrected. There is aftermarket for those faults ...
I wonder if they managed to get the trailer chassis right though...
/ Robin
Knowing Dragon they will screw this one up too like they did with the wheels and missiles on their wheeled hawk missile launcher
27-1025
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Monday, March 12, 2018 - 09:24 PM UTC
Gotta admit that would look cool slingloaded under a Trumpeter Chinook
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Monday, March 12, 2018 - 09:29 PM UTC
Hopefully it will be a nice kit.
This statement is not really correct. It wasn't the end of the Cold War that was the reason it was retired. The Lance Missile was replaced by the superior MLRS system and guided aircraft munitions; a.k.a. "Smart Bombs". Both of these were used very successfully in Operation Desert Storm in '91.
Yup.
Or loaded internally.
Quoted Text
With the end of the Cold War, the MGM-52 was withdrawn from service in 1992.
This statement is not really correct. It wasn't the end of the Cold War that was the reason it was retired. The Lance Missile was replaced by the superior MLRS system and guided aircraft munitions; a.k.a. "Smart Bombs". Both of these were used very successfully in Operation Desert Storm in '91.
Quoted Text
...that would look cool slingloaded under a Trumpeter Chinook
Yup.
Or loaded internally.
Kevlar06
Washington, United States
Joined: March 15, 2009
KitMaker: 3,670 posts
Armorama: 2,052 posts
Joined: March 15, 2009
KitMaker: 3,670 posts
Armorama: 2,052 posts
Posted: Monday, March 12, 2018 - 09:44 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Gotta admit that would look cool slingloaded under a Trumpeter Chinook
It could also be carried inside-- but then it would be hard to see! I just hope they follow thier own line drawings-- which seem correct. But if they use the fantasy wheels from the Hawk kit, that would be bad. I haven't bought any new Dragon kits lately due to their accuracy issues, but if this one looks as good as the drawings, I might make an exception.
VR, Russ
27-1025
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 13, 2018 - 05:21 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Cool!
I presume that none of the faults on the launcher parts for the tracked version have been corrected. There is aftermarket for those faults ...
I wonder if they managed to get the trailer chassis right though...
/ Robin
The kit launcher truss assy is pretty good. Will have to wait and see how they do with the mobility kit. We already know the missile control surfaces will be all jacked up and the control/equipment storage boxes will be missing (thankfully Perfect Scale Modelbau has already addressed that stuff for us.