Enjoy!
https://railroadmodeling.kitmaker.net/forums/273605
Hosted by Darren Baker
Tank On Flatcar Cover Boo Boo
Posted: Saturday, December 08, 2018 - 05:23 PM UTC
Scarred
Washington, United States
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 08, 2018 - 08:20 PM UTC
It's obvious they did that to fool the enemy.
Blaubar
Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany
Joined: December 15, 2016
KitMaker: 261 posts
Armorama: 246 posts
Joined: December 15, 2016
KitMaker: 261 posts
Armorama: 246 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 08, 2018 - 10:03 PM UTC
😂
Thanks for sharing this.
Thanks for sharing this.
iowabrit
Iowa, United States
Joined: November 06, 2007
KitMaker: 585 posts
Armorama: 557 posts
Joined: November 06, 2007
KitMaker: 585 posts
Armorama: 557 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 09, 2018 - 01:30 AM UTC
It was parked in reverse gear...that confused them.
RobinNilsson
TOS Moderator
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 09, 2018 - 01:42 AM UTC
You guys are killing me with your creative humour
Back on topic:
Is that tank a welded or cast hull?
/ Robin
Back on topic:
Is that tank a welded or cast hull?
/ Robin
Scarred
Washington, United States
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 09, 2018 - 03:00 AM UTC
Quoted Text
You guys are killing me with your creative humour
Back on topic:
Is that tank a welded or cast hull?
/ Robin
Killjoy.
Was wondering that myself but that lump on the engine deck must be a box.
RobinNilsson
TOS Moderator
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 09, 2018 - 03:16 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextYou guys are killing me with your creative humour
Back on topic:
Is that tank a welded or cast hull?
/ Robin
Killjoy.
Was wondering that myself but that lump on the engine deck must be a box.
I was thinking about the line of the edge between upper hull side and the topside. Is it a smooth curve as on a cast hull or is it the straight sections of a welded hull?
I am think cast hull but I am far from certain and eyes can be fooled ....
/ Robin
Scarred
Washington, United States
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 09, 2018 - 03:52 AM UTC
That light colored line almost looks like a corner vs rounded edge but you look towards the front of the tank it does look a bit rounded so I'd almost think cast hull also.
obg153
Texas, United States
Joined: April 07, 2009
KitMaker: 1,063 posts
Armorama: 1,049 posts
Joined: April 07, 2009
KitMaker: 1,063 posts
Armorama: 1,049 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 09, 2018 - 06:50 AM UTC
In a statement released earlier today, a spokesman for the Tarp Drapers Union claimed that the tarps had been pre-positioned along the track in the proper order, and blamed the train's engineer for pulling the entire line of flatcars into the prep area in the wrong direction.
Posted: Sunday, December 09, 2018 - 10:23 AM UTC
Clearly the lead tank is planning a retreat!
The white line suggests welded hull to me - the cast hulls had a much more rounded shoulder that wouldn't give a sharp line like that. There are no sand shields, so it isn't a new tank, and anyway the box on the back is way too small to be the factory equipment box seen on new tanks. The thing that puzzles me is the horizontal crease below the "M4" text - is that the base of the tail plate on an M4A3? The standard idler-adjusting tool can be seen on the rear, but no sign of a crank handle...
The white line suggests welded hull to me - the cast hulls had a much more rounded shoulder that wouldn't give a sharp line like that. There are no sand shields, so it isn't a new tank, and anyway the box on the back is way too small to be the factory equipment box seen on new tanks. The thing that puzzles me is the horizontal crease below the "M4" text - is that the base of the tail plate on an M4A3? The standard idler-adjusting tool can be seen on the rear, but no sign of a crank handle...
beachbm2
United States
Joined: December 21, 2002
KitMaker: 400 posts
Armorama: 151 posts
Joined: December 21, 2002
KitMaker: 400 posts
Armorama: 151 posts
Posted: Monday, December 10, 2018 - 03:32 AM UTC
Clearly the Tarps were put on by GI's who could care less what the tarp says. They got them on and were done.
Scarred
Washington, United States
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Joined: March 11, 2016
KitMaker: 1,792 posts
Armorama: 1,186 posts
Posted: Monday, December 10, 2018 - 05:08 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Clearly the Tarps were put on by GI's who could care less what the tarp says. They got them on and were done.
Now now, it could be they're loaded at the factory and the overworked employees were in a hurry.
KurtLaughlin
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Monday, December 10, 2018 - 12:49 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextClearly the Tarps were put on by GI's who could care less what the tarp says. They got them on and were done.
Now now, it could be they're loaded at the factory and the overworked employees were in a hurry.
These would be factory deliveries, not troop loadings.
It could be as simple as the tarp was designed to be arranged a particular way but in use it was found to work even if reversed, so the markings were ignored.
KL