In the picture of the tank's destruction you can see the camo is clearly sprayed on. To me also, it looks a bit more sparse and wispy than the colour plates.
RLlockie
United Kingdom Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
I don’t think the sort of coverage you seek exists. However, SS101 probably painted its tanks at much the same time with the same personnel so you could work from the general style of other tanks of the Abteilung, which were sprayed.
On the positive front, it’s unlikely that anyone will show up and tell you that you are wrong and have evidence to support their claim. Then again, if they did, you might welcome the information😀
TopSmith
Washington, United States Joined: August 09, 2002
KitMaker: 1,742 posts
Armorama: 1,658 posts
"Maybe because it's a drawing" might also explain the odd shaping of the fenders in that side angle pic. They appear to slope and become narrower towards the rear. Haven't seen this in other Tiger 1 photos. I'd agree with the others, in that you can pretty well match the colors, and if you came close to the pattern as in Frenchy's pic, you'd be OK.
Even my pick-up is panzer grey.
Byrden
Wien, Austria Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
the odd shaping of the fenders in that side angle pic. They appear to slope and become narrower towards the rear.
Because the artist painted over a diagram of the hull without fenders, and he painted fenders to match the bottom edge of the hull side, without knowing that the real ones extend down beyond the hull side.
He also missed the facts that 007 was a Command Tiger and was not the final version.
David
Frenchy
Rhone, France Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Of extra interest is Tiger 214 - very blurry, crudely painted compared to the other ones. I wonder: was the crew not that interested? Was it hastily renumbered in field?
Seahawk
California, United States Joined: May 29, 2016
KitMaker: 61 posts
Armorama: 56 posts