Sorry for the flurry of questions as of late but there is alot of varying information on Tiger 007,
Sooo Is there a decent five shot (sides/front/back/top) color picture of Tiger 007
Thank you very much for all your help.
Jeff
Hosted by Darren Baker
Tiger 007 Camo Pattern
Seahawk
California, United States
Joined: May 29, 2016
KitMaker: 61 posts
Armorama: 56 posts
Joined: May 29, 2016
KitMaker: 61 posts
Armorama: 56 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 03, 2019 - 07:41 AM UTC
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 03, 2019 - 08:27 AM UTC
Don't know if it's accurate or not...
Full size
To me the green and brown appear to be a bit too "wavy" (like on the rear of the Rommelkiste)...
H.P.
Full size
To me the green and brown appear to be a bit too "wavy" (like on the rear of the Rommelkiste)...
H.P.
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 03, 2019 - 12:00 PM UTC
The pattern looks fairly hard-edged...maybe because it's a drawing? Is it more likely to be brush painted, or sprayed?
Jmarles
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: November 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,138 posts
Armorama: 953 posts
Joined: November 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,138 posts
Armorama: 953 posts
Posted: Thursday, January 03, 2019 - 12:27 PM UTC
In the picture of the tank's destruction you can see the camo is clearly sprayed on. To me also, it looks a bit more sparse and wispy than the colour plates.
RLlockie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Posted: Friday, January 04, 2019 - 07:00 AM UTC
I don’t think the sort of coverage you seek exists. However, SS101 probably painted its tanks at much the same time with the same personnel so you could work from the general style of other tanks of the Abteilung, which were sprayed.
On the positive front, it’s unlikely that anyone will show up and tell you that you are wrong and have evidence to support their claim. Then again, if they did, you might welcome the information😀
On the positive front, it’s unlikely that anyone will show up and tell you that you are wrong and have evidence to support their claim. Then again, if they did, you might welcome the information😀
TopSmith
Washington, United States
Joined: August 09, 2002
KitMaker: 1,742 posts
Armorama: 1,658 posts
Joined: August 09, 2002
KitMaker: 1,742 posts
Armorama: 1,658 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 05, 2019 - 06:16 AM UTC
From what I know there were very few photos of 007 to get a specific pattern from. Just enough to hint at a style.
obg153
Texas, United States
Joined: April 07, 2009
KitMaker: 1,063 posts
Armorama: 1,049 posts
Joined: April 07, 2009
KitMaker: 1,063 posts
Armorama: 1,049 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 05, 2019 - 07:22 AM UTC
"Maybe because it's a drawing" might also explain the odd shaping of the fenders in that side angle pic. They appear to slope and become narrower towards the rear. Haven't seen this in other Tiger 1 photos. I'd agree with the others, in that you can pretty well match the colors, and if you came close to the pattern as in Frenchy's pic, you'd be OK.
Byrden
Wien, Austria
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Joined: July 12, 2005
KitMaker: 2,233 posts
Armorama: 2,221 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 05, 2019 - 07:34 AM UTC
Quoted Text
the odd shaping of the fenders in that side angle pic. They appear to slope and become narrower towards the rear.
Because the artist painted over a diagram of the hull without fenders, and he painted fenders to match the bottom edge of the hull side, without knowing that the real ones extend down beyond the hull side.
He also missed the facts that 007 was a Command Tiger and was not the final version.
David
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 05, 2019 - 09:11 AM UTC
Here you'll find a few more color profiles for Tigers from the Schwere-SS Panzer Abteilung 101 in Normandy :
https://images.auctionhelper.com/images/10343//H-Models%20Decals/HMDT35009A.jpg
https://images.auctionhelper.com/images/10343//H-Models%20Decals/HMDT72009C.jpg
% of artistic licence unknown...
H.P.
https://images.auctionhelper.com/images/10343//H-Models%20Decals/HMDT35009A.jpg
https://images.auctionhelper.com/images/10343//H-Models%20Decals/HMDT72009C.jpg
% of artistic licence unknown...
H.P.
Jmarles
British Columbia, Canada
Joined: November 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,138 posts
Armorama: 953 posts
Joined: November 02, 2008
KitMaker: 1,138 posts
Armorama: 953 posts
Posted: Saturday, January 05, 2019 - 11:32 AM UTC
We know colour plates can often be wishful thinking, or as David has pointed out, the vehicle is not correctly depicted.
This thread compiles some pics of 007, 008 and 009 and you can get a general idea of the scheme and how it was applied:
http://ww2f.com/threads/ssspzabt-101s-tigers-in-normandy-pictures.30225/
Of extra interest is Tiger 214 - very blurry, crudely painted compared to the other ones. I wonder: was the crew not that interested? Was it hastily renumbered in field?
This thread compiles some pics of 007, 008 and 009 and you can get a general idea of the scheme and how it was applied:
http://ww2f.com/threads/ssspzabt-101s-tigers-in-normandy-pictures.30225/
Of extra interest is Tiger 214 - very blurry, crudely painted compared to the other ones. I wonder: was the crew not that interested? Was it hastily renumbered in field?
Seahawk
California, United States
Joined: May 29, 2016
KitMaker: 61 posts
Armorama: 56 posts
Joined: May 29, 2016
KitMaker: 61 posts
Armorama: 56 posts
Posted: Monday, January 07, 2019 - 05:34 AM UTC
Awesome info
Thank you all
Jeff
Thank you all
Jeff