_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Academy turns 50, and celebrates by releasing
system
Visit this Community
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: November 24, 2008
KitMaker: 364 posts
Armorama: 363 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - 06:34 AM UTC

Quoted Text

Not British old boy



You say that, but I have evidence that the so-called 'Spitfire' they make is a direct copy of R.J.Mitchell's original design, only smaller.
m4sherman
Visit this Community
Arizona, United States
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - 07:57 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Tamiya lost a law suit because Academy changed the locating pin locations. As a result they could not prove the kits were copied. I doubt they are going to be friends any time soon.



Do you have any documentation of that? Realistic depictions of ordinary objects are always difficult to get protected. That explanation sounds like a sort-or-true-but-not-really, face-saving statement to justify losing a case that had no chance of succeeding, or to rationalize never fighting it at all.

KL



Mr. Tamiya told his life long friend Yasuo Ohtsuka about it. Mr. Ohtsuka told us the story while visiting back in the 1990's. I didn't, don't, feel like questioning Mr. Ohtsuka's integrity.



It's not a matter of integrity, it's a matter of documentation. That's the difference between factual events and apocrypha. I don't doubt that's what the guy was told, or what he believes he was told.

It would interesting to know the details of the case.

KL



I'm guessing the court documents are buried somewhere in Korea.

Cute choice of word, but it does not fit my post because very few people knew what Mr. Ohtsuka told us. Let's call it hearsay, a very appropriate word, and drop the subject.
m4sherman
Visit this Community
Arizona, United States
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - 08:07 AM UTC

Quoted Text

There is in international copyright practice a percentage clause. If so much is different one can say they improved an existing product rather than pirating it.

So you can get Academy, Trumpeter and others pretty much copying other companies molds and then changing just enough to skate under the wire. Everything gets further confused in how Asia has been doing tooling for Western model companies for decades.

Obvious examples are the Lee copies of Esci and Tamiya that actually have small improvements accuracy wise over the original. Academy M60 copy of Tamiya had separate handles and fender inserts so it offers small improvements.

And of course going back into the 1960s there was a game of copying, inspiration and musical boxes going on between the West and Asia. I forget how many companies slavishly copied so many American kits and modified them for motorization or changed the scale -- it's really mind blowing.

But again we all give a pass to so many offenders and hold it against Academy. Same stuff different day. Even that stupid Lee stuff. They fixed the suspension within a year or two of the original release and offered replacement. The interior is simplified but no other Lee kit has anything inside other than a company logo.

And yes I do as much wire and sprue as anybody else with grab handles so leave off with the spoon fed smart remarks. I really resent that kind of stuff and you should be ashamed of yourself and really take whatever worth your post may otherwise have and flush it down the toilet.

At least some can present facts and a gentle nudge but some just get under your skin.

Rant over and I'll do stop typing.

Yeah really bad morning. Need to clean off the workbenches and build something.

Yes indeed in the end I can sit back and realize just how great a fool I am.



I have to type carefully, I just got back from visiting my Mother. She has dementia, and it's very depressing to visit her.

I built one of the Academy M60A1's and over-all it was a bit better than the Tamiya one. Sadly they copied everything I didn't like about the Tamiya kit!

I forgot to add earlier, I think Academy should do the SU-100. I like how they did 95% of their T-34's, and I think they could do a good one. Winged and prop things aren't on my want list.
m4sherman
Visit this Community
Arizona, United States
Joined: January 18, 2006
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,808 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - 08:09 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Not British old boy



You say that, but I have evidence that the so-called 'Spitfire' they make is a direct copy of R.J.Mitchell's original design, only smaller.



Thank heavens I put down my drink before I read this! BRAVO!
rfbaer
Visit this Community
Texas, United States
Joined: June 12, 2007
KitMaker: 1,866 posts
Armorama: 1,696 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - 10:22 AM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Not British old boy



You say that, but I have evidence that the so-called 'Spitfire' they make is a direct copy of R.J.Mitchell's original design, only smaller.



Thank heavens I put down my drink before I read this! BRAVO!



Same here.
Petition2God
Visit this Community
Colorado, United States
Joined: February 06, 2002
KitMaker: 1,526 posts
Armorama: 1,294 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - 11:23 AM UTC
Wow, this thread really went off topic fast. If I may say something... It was like reading through a divorce case transcript - he did this to me 20 yrs ago, 30 yrs ago, blah, blah, blah.
I have to admit - I am also guilty of company bashing b/c I have been disappointed. I feel your pain. Dragon's latest releases for example.
At the same time, I commend Academy's latest efforts and recent improvements. Still better bang for the buck in many cases. Plus, they have been an industry leader in the aircrafts model arena.
It can be worse - like Italeri. Haha
Anyway, that heli looks awesome, and we know that more improved kits are coming out and we have been spoiled.
Kevlar06
Visit this Community
Washington, United States
Joined: March 15, 2009
KitMaker: 3,670 posts
Armorama: 2,052 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - 01:22 PM UTC
Well, I've been avoiding saying anything about this latest rift in the modeling world, but I guess I'll throw in my two bits anyway as I haven't got anything better to do at this moment. For those that are not aware, Academy has a different business model (pun intended) than many other manufacturers. They cater firstly to their own domestic market, then to everyone else. Anyone who's been to Korea will recognize they own their own hobby shops which are widely dispersed throughout the country. They really couldn't give a hoot about other manufactures competition, and have admittedly at times used designs from other companies. They also develop their own individual and unique designs, just like every other manufacturer. They have also manufactured for other companies--Airfix is one, RoG, HobbyCraft (another lawsuit by the way) and continue to do so. They could care less if you are a dedicated Academy fan or if you hate them and won't buy their product. They pride themselves on filling a niche between the crappy cottage industry/Eastern European kits, and expensive Tamiagawa uber kits, and they have done so rather well. Armor is not one of their best suits, but they continue to improve in some areas, the same as Monogram and Revell and others did in past years. I would say cut them some slack-- if you don't like their kits, don't buy them, and leave it at that. Like it or not, they have proven their worth in the modeling arena, and it's always nice to see any manufacturer releasing new products at reasonable prices, an area they have excelled in, primarily in the aircraft area. The same can't be said of other manufacturers, including Tamiya and Dragon, a manufacturer which has decidedly slipped in the last few years, conscientiously deciding to do so, without regard to pricing, and yet still survives. Academy has their niche-- take it or leave it. Now, back to the subject, their new releases do look nice.
VR, Russ
nsjohn
Visit this Community
Scotland, United Kingdom
Joined: July 26, 2018
KitMaker: 279 posts
Armorama: 265 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - 03:11 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Not British old boy



You say that, but I have evidence that the so-called 'Spitfire' they make is a direct copy of R.J.Mitchell's original design, only smaller.



I bet they changed the locating pins though
brekinapez
Visit this Community
Georgia, United States
Joined: July 26, 2013
KitMaker: 2,272 posts
Armorama: 1,860 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - 03:57 PM UTC
I don't have much of a dog in this hunt, as the only Academy kits I have built are their Pzkpfw 35(t) and Jagdpanzer 38(t), but both went together nicely and looked the part. They are both relatively new kits in the company's catalog and probably escaped many of the issues their earlier armor suffered although I knew not to buy their Tigers since there were so many better options on the market. I do know their aircraft have a pretty good reputation but I don't build any jet-era planes or anything smaller than 1/32 so I can't speak personally to those kits. I had heard good things about their most recent Abrams release and contemplated getting one since many of my coworkers served during the Middle East conflicts but frankly would pass on it if there is a better kit out there. I am glad we have enough manufacturers now that we have these choices in the first place. I was a Dragon loyalist for years and a majority of my stash came from the lizard, but they are being pushed aside by Takom and Meng now and all it will take is someone to start pumping out the softskins and smaller armored vehicles to make me totally jump off Dragon's ship to finish my collection of German vehicles. That company could even be Academy if they wanted to move into that area and managed to do it right. I wouldn't even care if they were copies of Dragon's kits as long as they didn't change anything for the worse and got rid of the DS plastic.
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 15, 2019 - 07:27 PM UTC

Quoted Text


Quoted Text

Why is it that whenever you disagree with someone else' model-building habits, you feel the need to add your own personal twist of the knife with a put-down..?



"Whenever" implies always, and I do not always make such comments, so again, factually incorrect.

I don't "disagree" with anyone's model-building habits because that would mean I give a [auto-censored] about them. Over the years though, I have seen people whose modeling direction can be charitably described as obsessive, and I'm sure you have as well. I reserve the right to glibly refer to them as "loony" from time to time.

KL



"Loony" is not a fair observation on your part, IMO. But then again, "looniness" can also be looked as "obsessiveness" as you say. From a personal standpoint, my own "looniness" tends to run in the direction of modifying/back-dating and updating certain 1/48 TAMIYA P-47s depicting the various aircraft from the 56th Fighter Group during WWII, (yes, I DO build A LOT of other 1/48 aircraft subjects, mostly US/Allied, WWII), HO brass and mixed-media examples of the "Steam Era", specifically the New York Central and the New York, Ontario & Western Rwy, 1/25 Dirt Modifieds and 1/24 Classic Cars, (1920s-1949), scale figurines in 1/35-120mm scales, and a good bit of WWII US/Allied subject matter. I also delve into scenic photography of the rural Upstate New York, Pennsylvania and New England variety. Am I obsessive? Maybe, but I don't obsess with just one thing... (shrug) Unfortunately, since the amputation of my right leg in 2010, and my various SERIOUS health problems over the last 2 years, my photography especially, has had to be curtailed...
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 - 09:44 AM UTC
Academy has given us the best Panzer IV out there. The only thing close is the Dragon J kit. Their Stug IV is just as nice. How about a Mobile Wagon or a new Whirblewind?
Gary
M4A1Sherman
Visit this Community
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 - 12:45 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Academy has given us the best Panzer IV out there. The only thing close is the Dragon J kit. Their Stug IV is just as nice. How about a Mobile Wagon or a new Whirblewind?
Gary



Not to be a wise-guy, but it's "Moebelwagen", (sorry, I still haven't figured out how to make my keyboard give me "umlauts"), and "Wirbelwind"- "Moebelwagen" translates into "Furniture Van", so named because of those high, folding armored skirts surrounding the vehicle's fighting compartment, and "Wirbelwind" translates into "Whirlwind"... Really, I don't mean to be a pain...
brekinapez
Visit this Community
Georgia, United States
Joined: July 26, 2013
KitMaker: 2,272 posts
Armorama: 1,860 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 16, 2019 - 02:56 PM UTC

Quoted Text

sorry, I still haven't figured out how to make my keyboard give me "umlauts"



For ö,

hold down the ALT button while typing 0246 if you are on PC.

Möbelwagen
 _GOTOTOP