Hosted by Darren Baker
M1 IP Abrams Question
27-1025
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 - 11:02 AM UTC
Was hunting through the Live Resin catalog for a replacement M2 mg and mount for the M1 IP Abrams tank but no luck. Does anyone know of any decent replacements for the offering in the Panda Models kit?
system
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: November 24, 2008
KitMaker: 364 posts
Armorama: 363 posts
Joined: November 24, 2008
KitMaker: 364 posts
Armorama: 363 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 - 06:46 PM UTC
I don't think a standard M2 would be accurate anyway. This is the product you need:
http://www.voyagermodel.com/productdetails.asp?itemid=VBS0204
http://www.voyagermodel.com/productdetails.asp?itemid=VBS0204
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 - 07:12 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I don't think a standard M2 would be accurate anyway. This is the product you need:
http://www.voyagermodel.com/productdetails.asp?itemid=VBS0204
I'll second that! That's what I used on my various M1 kits...
27-1025
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 21, 2019 - 06:26 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I don't think a standard M2 would be accurate anyway. This is the product you need:
http://www.voyagermodel.com/productdetails.asp?itemid=VBS0204
Thank you! That is exactly what I am looking for.
panamadan
Minnesota, United States
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 1,513 posts
Armorama: 1,449 posts
Joined: July 20, 2004
KitMaker: 1,513 posts
Armorama: 1,449 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 21, 2019 - 10:59 AM UTC
Does this voyager set have the M10 charging handle?
It’s hard to see that part clearly when it’s not painted?
Dan
It’s hard to see that part clearly when it’s not painted?
Dan
27-1025
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Friday, March 22, 2019 - 04:22 PM UTC
27-1025
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Friday, March 29, 2019 - 04:18 AM UTC
Taylornic
Tennessee, United States
Joined: January 10, 2005
KitMaker: 337 posts
Armorama: 332 posts
Joined: January 10, 2005
KitMaker: 337 posts
Armorama: 332 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 30, 2019 - 04:40 AM UTC
Looking good. Watching this...
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 30, 2019 - 06:29 AM UTC
It is coming along nicely. One issue though, the MRE boxes are the mid-late '90s to present versions. The early version was a flatter, more rectangular box. The older boxes were available in older Tamiya kits and from many AM sources.
Old box on bottom, new box on top.
Old right, new left.
Old box on bottom, new box on top.
Old right, new left.
27-1025
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 30, 2019 - 06:55 AM UTC
Quoted Text
It is coming along nicely. One issue though, the MRE boxes are the mid-late '90s to present versions. The early version was a flatter, more rectangular box. The older boxes were available in older Tamiya kits and from many AM sources.
Old box on bottom, new box on top.
Them
Old right, new left.
Yea that’s what I remembered too. Thought about squishing them flatter
I’ve got an old set floating around here someplace and will replace these. Also wanted to throw into a couple of folding cots. The skirts actually turned out okay and look good painted up. Will take some pics when all done.
27-1025
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 31, 2019 - 09:13 AM UTC
Ok next big question that M1 tankers might know the answers to: the vehicle I'm loosely basing this build on has the orange anti-collision light mounted right on top of the engine deck and you can make out a wire running towards the front on the right side. Where is the wire going to? Second this tank has a spare roadwheel on the left front top of turret. How is it secured? Thanks. BTW the reference photo is on page 34 of Tankograd Reforger 1986-1993.
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 31, 2019 - 09:20 AM UTC
Not sure on the anti-collision beacon. For the spare road wheel, there are four bolts on the left front of the turret. These are used for a lifting ring to be attached. The spare road wheel is attached by removing one of the bolts and running it through one of the lugnut holes and reattaching it to the top of the hull.
27-1025
North Carolina, United States
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Joined: September 16, 2004
KitMaker: 1,281 posts
Armorama: 1,222 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 31, 2019 - 09:48 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Not sure on the anti-collision beacon. For the spare road wheel, there are four bolts on the left front of the turret. These are used for a lifting ring to be attached. The spare road wheel is attached by removing one of the bolts and running it through one of the lugnut holes and reattaching it to the top of the hull.
Okay I see the four bolts, makes sense now. Thanks.