I was recently looking around the www for info on the proposed M109A8*, with a view to modelling the concept vehicle, when I noted that the majority of info was on Chinese language sites. Some of the info was very specific, and technical, and I found myself wondering whether it should be in the public domain or not. Surely there are some restrictions on publishing what could be opsec info?
Kylie
*Gino, HP, any good images appreciated
Hosted by Darren Baker
Is this right, M109A8 info....
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24534/245342906206fef97b1af1c54500a9d15bd0909b" alt=""
knewton
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46438/464381a85fafbebe8093f78736e9f19cd64d07ca" alt="Contributor's Award - This member has contributed content to Armorama in the past year."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c6f0/9c6f0f8f86b02dfa14079bd3e8d63581f1fd3390" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: June 19, 2013
KitMaker: 1,217 posts
Armorama: 1,092 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 21, 2019 - 01:57 PM UTC
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1793/f1793cf04ce8b854b5d4b637b0011a7e84785290" alt=""
KurtLaughlin
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b71cb/b71cbabb1b3e0b1606cd88d26ba6e59221c1c6cf" alt=""
Posted: Thursday, February 21, 2019 - 02:45 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Surely there are some restrictions on publishing what could be opsec info?
If the thing hasn't been built yet it cannot have any effect on operational security . . .
KL
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62941/62941fc530fe7f0acea1846c760193acebcee688" alt=""
Frenchy
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/761e8/761e8316e224393230658efd47db779b4d1efcc8" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b127/1b1276e8ee4bf7f77b562143de9ec395d767982c" alt="General of the Army"
Posted: Friday, February 22, 2019 - 01:18 AM UTC
All the pics I've found so far appear to show the new ERCA (Extended Range Cannon Artillery) gun fitted to a M109A6 hull for testing :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ae72/7ae72523abcb30756a27b2d5b29d3845cdd0001f" alt=""
This new gun should be fitted to the yet-to-be-built M109A8....
It is six feet longer than the existing gun on the M109A7 howitzer seen in the foreground :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5d7a/a5d7aef2bd06a6a4f6d8c9ace3babdf0afd01719" alt=""
Full size
H.P.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ae72/7ae72523abcb30756a27b2d5b29d3845cdd0001f" alt=""
This new gun should be fitted to the yet-to-be-built M109A8....
It is six feet longer than the existing gun on the M109A7 howitzer seen in the foreground :
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a5d7a/a5d7aef2bd06a6a4f6d8c9ace3babdf0afd01719" alt=""
Full size
H.P.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5dbb4/5dbb4d002f93916db731532e1e388eb0efab55dc" alt=""
HeavyArty
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46438/464381a85fafbebe8093f78736e9f19cd64d07ca" alt="Contributor's Award - This member has contributed content to Armorama in the past year."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b127/1b1276e8ee4bf7f77b562143de9ec395d767982c" alt="General of the Army"
Posted: Friday, February 22, 2019 - 03:24 AM UTC
Right now it is just an experimental long-range XM907 cannon mated to existing M109A6 Paladins for testing. There is no M109A8 prototype. I have not even seen a proposal for a "new" vehicle to carry the longer barreled cannon. As to OPSEC, it is pretty much all in the public domain, so not an OPSEC violation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24534/245342906206fef97b1af1c54500a9d15bd0909b" alt=""
knewton
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/46438/464381a85fafbebe8093f78736e9f19cd64d07ca" alt="Contributor's Award - This member has contributed content to Armorama in the past year."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9c6f0/9c6f0f8f86b02dfa14079bd3e8d63581f1fd3390" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: June 19, 2013
KitMaker: 1,217 posts
Armorama: 1,092 posts
Posted: Friday, February 22, 2019 - 07:34 AM UTC
Thank you, gents, for the clarification.
Kylie
Kylie
![]() |