My completed Leopard depicting a live firing exercise. Didn't dirty it up too much or else it'll hide the camo paint job.
Have to add the firing simulator just because it looks too good to be omitted.
P9300662 by mazyen, on Flickr
P9300643 by mazyen, on Flickr
P9300640 by mazyen, on Flickr
P9300642 by mazyen, on Flickr
P9300652 by mazyen, on Flickr
P9300653 by mazyen, on Flickr
P9300658 by mazyen, on Flickr
Cheers
Lee
Hosted by Darren Baker
Meng's Leopard 2 A7
mazyen
Singapore / 新加坡
Joined: June 21, 2007
KitMaker: 112 posts
Armorama: 79 posts
Joined: June 21, 2007
KitMaker: 112 posts
Armorama: 79 posts
Posted: Monday, April 29, 2019 - 03:32 AM UTC
bill_c
Campaigns Administrator
New Jersey, United States
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Joined: January 09, 2008
KitMaker: 10,553 posts
Armorama: 8,109 posts
Posted: Monday, April 29, 2019 - 11:03 AM UTC
Very nice. Meng kits are my favorite.
redcap
England - East Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: November 06, 2005
KitMaker: 753 posts
Armorama: 378 posts
Joined: November 06, 2005
KitMaker: 753 posts
Armorama: 378 posts
Posted: Monday, April 29, 2019 - 11:53 AM UTC
Excellent build, nice and clean with just a hint of weathering; just how a modern high-tech MBT model should be as my preference.
Gary
Gary
ptruhe
Texas, United States
Joined: March 05, 2003
KitMaker: 2,092 posts
Armorama: 1,607 posts
Joined: March 05, 2003
KitMaker: 2,092 posts
Armorama: 1,607 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 - 01:28 AM UTC
Looks great!
pod3105
Waterford, Ireland
Joined: August 08, 2010
KitMaker: 466 posts
Armorama: 444 posts
Joined: August 08, 2010
KitMaker: 466 posts
Armorama: 444 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 - 01:35 AM UTC
Very nice
agriamodeling
Budapest, Hungary
Joined: March 09, 2018
KitMaker: 206 posts
Armorama: 205 posts
Joined: March 09, 2018
KitMaker: 206 posts
Armorama: 205 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 - 04:31 AM UTC
Very nice kit, congrats!
Tamas
Tamas
ivanhoe6
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: April 05, 2007
KitMaker: 2,023 posts
Armorama: 1,234 posts
Joined: April 05, 2007
KitMaker: 2,023 posts
Armorama: 1,234 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 - 04:48 AM UTC
Nice looking Leo Mazyen ! How was the kit to build ?
Thank you for sharing with us.
Thank you for sharing with us.
mazyen
Singapore / 新加坡
Joined: June 21, 2007
KitMaker: 112 posts
Armorama: 79 posts
Joined: June 21, 2007
KitMaker: 112 posts
Armorama: 79 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 - 08:57 PM UTC
Only major issue with the kit is that the rear of the turret is scrapping the rear deck. What I did was to raise up the turret by adding plastic card spacer around the turret ring. It also has individual workable tracks which is very nice.
Cheers
Cheers
Posted: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 - 09:03 PM UTC
Very nice!
mshackleton
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: December 16, 2007
KitMaker: 559 posts
Armorama: 517 posts
Joined: December 16, 2007
KitMaker: 559 posts
Armorama: 517 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 - 09:16 PM UTC
The problem is not the turret ring. The rear hull is a big moulding and it sags naturally. It has also lost some of its strength weakened by leaving out the engine hatches. Even with the hatches moulded in place (on other kits) this is a perpetual problem with Leopard 2.
There are two solutions. Add your own bulkhead (Revell supply this in their latest kits) to support and level out the rear deck immediately behind the ring. OR Take a suitable length bolt – or cut one to length – and adjust the height using a nut. No glue necessary and micro adjustments are easy. Bingo!
Another common problem with the Meng kit are the toy-like torsion bars. I have seen a few builds where the ride height of the hull is too low, either because of track tension, or weak, unglued torsion bars. On the real machine there is a very definite, visible gap between the bottom of the skirts and the tops of the wheels. Please beware of this problem.
This particular model here suffers from this problem, but not as bad as others I have seen. The bottom rails of the footsteps should be at the same level as the inner rim of the tyres on the road wheels. Take a look at photos of the real machine with a quick Google search.
There are two solutions. Add your own bulkhead (Revell supply this in their latest kits) to support and level out the rear deck immediately behind the ring. OR Take a suitable length bolt – or cut one to length – and adjust the height using a nut. No glue necessary and micro adjustments are easy. Bingo!
Another common problem with the Meng kit are the toy-like torsion bars. I have seen a few builds where the ride height of the hull is too low, either because of track tension, or weak, unglued torsion bars. On the real machine there is a very definite, visible gap between the bottom of the skirts and the tops of the wheels. Please beware of this problem.
This particular model here suffers from this problem, but not as bad as others I have seen. The bottom rails of the footsteps should be at the same level as the inner rim of the tyres on the road wheels. Take a look at photos of the real machine with a quick Google search.
RobinNilsson
TOS Moderator
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 01, 2019 - 02:37 AM UTC
mazyen
Singapore / 新加坡
Joined: June 21, 2007
KitMaker: 112 posts
Armorama: 79 posts
Joined: June 21, 2007
KitMaker: 112 posts
Armorama: 79 posts
Posted: Wednesday, May 01, 2019 - 04:33 AM UTC
Ride ht will be easy to adjust.
mazyen
Singapore / 新加坡
Joined: June 21, 2007
KitMaker: 112 posts
Armorama: 79 posts
Joined: June 21, 2007
KitMaker: 112 posts
Armorama: 79 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 05, 2019 - 05:59 PM UTC
mshackleton
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: December 16, 2007
KitMaker: 559 posts
Armorama: 517 posts
Joined: December 16, 2007
KitMaker: 559 posts
Armorama: 517 posts
Posted: Sunday, May 05, 2019 - 10:07 PM UTC
Well done. That looks much better. What was the actual problem - the torsion bars?
mazyen
Singapore / 新加坡
Joined: June 21, 2007
KitMaker: 112 posts
Armorama: 79 posts
Joined: June 21, 2007
KitMaker: 112 posts
Armorama: 79 posts
Posted: Monday, May 06, 2019 - 12:22 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Well done. That looks much better. What was the actual problem - the torsion bars?
Yes, Micheal, it looks much better now. It’s the torsion bars. Just hv to cut them & glue the swing arms at the correct ht. Thanks for pointing it out.
Cheers
Lee
scubatwo
Alabama, United States
Joined: January 07, 2017
KitMaker: 83 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Joined: January 07, 2017
KitMaker: 83 posts
Armorama: 73 posts
Posted: Tuesday, May 07, 2019 - 08:54 AM UTC
Great looking work!
mazyen
Singapore / 新加坡
Joined: June 21, 2007
KitMaker: 112 posts
Armorama: 79 posts
Joined: June 21, 2007
KitMaker: 112 posts
Armorama: 79 posts
Posted: Tuesday, October 29, 2019 - 06:25 PM UTC
Here's an update of my Leo with crew & remote weapons station added.
Leopard 2 A7 by mazyen, on Flickr
Leopard 2 A7 by mazyen, on Flickr
Leopard 2 A7 by mazyen, on Flickr
Leopard 2 A7 by mazyen, on Flickr
Leopard 2 A7 by mazyen, on Flickr
Leopard 2 A7 by mazyen, on Flickr
Leopard 2 A7 by mazyen, on Flickr
Leopard 2 A7 by mazyen, on Flickr