Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
News
Italeri: Upgraded M4A1 Shermanvaranusk
Managing Editor
Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: July 04, 2013
KitMaker: 1,288 posts
Armorama: 942 posts
Joined: July 04, 2013
KitMaker: 1,288 posts
Armorama: 942 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 15, 2019 - 11:19 AM UTC
Italeri has improved their M4A1 Sherman kit adding new gluable rubber tracks and 10 figures.
Read the Full News Story
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Paulinsibculo
Overijssel, Netherlands
Joined: July 01, 2010
KitMaker: 1,322 posts
Armorama: 1,239 posts
Joined: July 01, 2010
KitMaker: 1,322 posts
Armorama: 1,239 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 15, 2019 - 12:08 PM UTC
Nate_W
Missouri, United States
Joined: April 13, 2012
KitMaker: 395 posts
Armorama: 391 posts
Joined: April 13, 2012
KitMaker: 395 posts
Armorama: 391 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 15, 2019 - 02:35 PM UTC
Looks pretty interesting, I like the infantry included. I'm still looking forward to the ASUKA Model 35-047 M4A1 76mm.
GeraldOwens
Florida, United States
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Joined: March 30, 2006
KitMaker: 3,736 posts
Armorama: 3,697 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 15, 2019 - 02:51 PM UTC
Apart from the added Masterbox figures of US paratroopers, the only upgrade to the 1977 Italeri kit is the substitution of steel tracks for the rubber block T51 tracks in the original issue (now reformulated with glueable soft plastic instead of stiff, black, vinyl). It retains the open-spoke cast wheels, which were seen on a few M4A1 76 W tanks, but most had the solid, stamped wheels and idlers.
If you want to build one of the Normandy vehicles. leave off the U-shaped cover on the air inlet between the driver and bow gunner's hatches, as that wasn't seen on early vehicles. The vent cowling on the back of the turret bustle was also absent on many of the early tanks in Normandy. The step on the 76 mm gun tube should be sanded out, as this wasn't present on any US Sherman. Some texturing should be added to the hull and turret, as they are completely smooth on the kit. The kit also includes a British radio antenna base, which is only correct for a British vehicle in Italy.
If you want to build one of the Normandy vehicles. leave off the U-shaped cover on the air inlet between the driver and bow gunner's hatches, as that wasn't seen on early vehicles. The vent cowling on the back of the turret bustle was also absent on many of the early tanks in Normandy. The step on the 76 mm gun tube should be sanded out, as this wasn't present on any US Sherman. Some texturing should be added to the hull and turret, as they are completely smooth on the kit. The kit also includes a British radio antenna base, which is only correct for a British vehicle in Italy.
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 15, 2019 - 10:09 PM UTC
The US infantry figures don't have any canteens, bayonets or entrenching tools.
Even the airborne typically carried more gear.
And just to make 100% certain: these figures are wearing double buckle boots and the 1944 combat uniform as worn by the US airborne in Operation Market Garden. So with very little modification they can also be standard US infantry. Mostly get rid of the thigh pockets. But you don't have to.
BTW, if you have any of the Academy M3 Lee or Grant kits you will have a full set of solid road wheels left over. Every Academy Sherman kit has many of the bits left over that can be used to update and detail one of these.
The joy of spare parts and generous companies putting similar parts on multiple sprues over the succeeding generations of kits.
Even the airborne typically carried more gear.
And just to make 100% certain: these figures are wearing double buckle boots and the 1944 combat uniform as worn by the US airborne in Operation Market Garden. So with very little modification they can also be standard US infantry. Mostly get rid of the thigh pockets. But you don't have to.
BTW, if you have any of the Academy M3 Lee or Grant kits you will have a full set of solid road wheels left over. Every Academy Sherman kit has many of the bits left over that can be used to update and detail one of these.
The joy of spare parts and generous companies putting similar parts on multiple sprues over the succeeding generations of kits.
RECON22
Queensland, Australia
Joined: February 10, 2012
KitMaker: 665 posts
Armorama: 652 posts
Joined: February 10, 2012
KitMaker: 665 posts
Armorama: 652 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 16, 2019 - 03:24 PM UTC
Yep, I just wish a manufacturer would get it right....if you make a kit with decals for a certain time frame....make the right infantry (paratroopers) wearing the appropriate uniform to suit the early/ late war time frame.
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 16, 2019 - 08:03 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Yep, I just wish a manufacturer would get it right....if you make a kit with decals for a certain time frame....make the right infantry (paratroopers) wearing the appropriate uniform to suit the early/ late war time frame.
If this kit had Battle of the Bulge markings the figures would be perfect.
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 16, 2019 - 11:53 PM UTC
Hi, All!
I have several of these kits in ITALERI and TESTORS guises. I find ALL of them wanting. I also have two of the DRAGON M4A1 76mm (Wet) "OPERATION COBRA" kits, and they aren't very much better. All are still un-built.
I'm going to wait for ASUKA's rendering of same, and then I'll go from there. (LUCKY MODELS has them up for "PRE-ORDER")
If you guys know me, I'll have to "improve on everything" even IF the upcoming ASUKA kit will be "as good as it gets" in plastic... That's what after-market "goodies" are for; i.e, PE, resin and good ol' kit-bashing and scratch-building.
You guys want PERFECT Sherman kits? Dig out your "elbow grease" and your wallets...
PS- It's pretty doubtful that we'll EVER see Shermans with Interiors. For me, it's all the same because even if you build one of the "Big Hatch" 47-degree Hull Shermans, the views through the various Hatches are minimal, at best...
I have several of these kits in ITALERI and TESTORS guises. I find ALL of them wanting. I also have two of the DRAGON M4A1 76mm (Wet) "OPERATION COBRA" kits, and they aren't very much better. All are still un-built.
I'm going to wait for ASUKA's rendering of same, and then I'll go from there. (LUCKY MODELS has them up for "PRE-ORDER")
If you guys know me, I'll have to "improve on everything" even IF the upcoming ASUKA kit will be "as good as it gets" in plastic... That's what after-market "goodies" are for; i.e, PE, resin and good ol' kit-bashing and scratch-building.
You guys want PERFECT Sherman kits? Dig out your "elbow grease" and your wallets...
PS- It's pretty doubtful that we'll EVER see Shermans with Interiors. For me, it's all the same because even if you build one of the "Big Hatch" 47-degree Hull Shermans, the views through the various Hatches are minimal, at best...
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Monday, June 17, 2019 - 12:01 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Yep, I just wish a manufacturer would get it right....if you make a kit with decals for a certain time frame....make the right infantry (paratroopers) wearing the appropriate uniform to suit the early/ late war time frame.
HEAR, HEAR!!!
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Monday, June 17, 2019 - 12:08 AM UTC
Quoted Text
The US infantry figures don't have any canteens, bayonets or entrenching tools.
Even the airborne typically carried more gear.
And just to make 100% certain: these figures are wearing double buckle boots and the 1944 combat uniform as worn by the US airborne in Operation Market Garden. So with very little modification they can also be standard US infantry. Mostly get rid of the thigh pockets. But you don't have to.
BTW, if you have any of the Academy M3 Lee or Grant kits you will have a full set of solid road wheels left over. Every Academy Sherman kit has many of the bits left over that can be used to update and detail one of these.
The joy of spare parts and generous companies putting similar parts on multiple sprues over the succeeding generations of kits.
As Steve just said, you can get rid of the Cargo Pockets ("Thigh Pockets") with some care, i.e, sanding and re-sculpting as needed. I just wish that SOMEONE would make proper US Tank Riders wearing the more common "1942" Uniforms, which were worn till way past VE and VJ Days, 1945... I've already said this countless times, so I AM NOT going to go into detail AGAIN...
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Monday, June 17, 2019 - 12:15 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Looks pretty interesting, I like the infantry included. I'm still looking forward to the ASUKA Model 35-047 M4A1 76mm.
Hi, NATE!
You can get the same Airborne Infantry made by MASTERBOX "for a song" on Ebay, and save the left-over bucks for the ASUKA kit, as Steve and Gerald have already mentioned. LUCKY MODELS has the ASUKA M4A1 76mm (Wet) on "PRE-ORDER", so get your dibs in early...
Bravo1102
New Jersey, United States
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Joined: December 08, 2003
KitMaker: 2,864 posts
Armorama: 2,497 posts
Posted: Monday, June 17, 2019 - 12:15 AM UTC
, you know what's really ironic is that a third of the US airborne divisions wore what you call the "1942" uniform of short jacket and leggings: the glider infantry.
I've seen pictures of them tank riding and you think; oh US regular infantry but they all have 101 ABN patches. It's the glider infantry. Can't win.
Still will get the set for a Battle of the Bulge or Spring of '45 tank.
Oh and they're PERFECT as is for Korean War infantry even with to the thigh pockets.
I've seen pictures of them tank riding and you think; oh US regular infantry but they all have 101 ABN patches. It's the glider infantry. Can't win.
Still will get the set for a Battle of the Bulge or Spring of '45 tank.
Oh and they're PERFECT as is for Korean War infantry even with to the thigh pockets.
M4A1Sherman
New York, United States
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Joined: May 02, 2013
KitMaker: 4,403 posts
Armorama: 4,078 posts
Posted: Monday, June 17, 2019 - 01:02 AM UTC
Quoted Text
:D, you know what's really ironic is that a third of the US airborne divisions wore what you call the "1942" uniform of short jacket and leggings: the glider infantry.
I've seen pictures of them tank riding and you think; oh US regular infantry but they all have 101 ABN patches. It's the glider infantry. Can't win.
Still will get the set for a Battle of the Bulge or Spring of '45 tank.
Oh and they're PERFECT as is for Korean War infantry even with to the thigh pockets.
Hi, Steve!
I have NO issues with the "Thigh Pockets"- MANY GIs wore their two-piece HBT Fatigue Suits well past the 6, June Invasion. The HBT Trousers in this Fatigue Suit did have "Thigh Pockets", and these were mostly worn with the M1938 Leggings as often as not...
Completely agree with you about the AIRBORNE Glider Infantry AND Regular Infantry wearing the "1942"-style Uniform, i.e, the short "Parsons" Jackets, a variety of OD Wool Trousers and the two-piece HBT Suits that I mentioned above, all with the Leggings. I wish the figure-makers would take this into consideration, instead of constantly molding GIs wearing the M1943 (Two-buckle) Combat Boots...