Part 3 of my article in now online. It deals with the main turret parts and gun.
Here is the link to Features section of my web site, where the article is: http://vodnik.net/index_feat.htm.
Cheers,
Pawel
Hosted by Darren Baker
1/35 Abrams kits comparison article - Part 3
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Friday, April 02, 2004 - 10:20 AM UTC
Jurgen
Limburg, Belgium
Joined: October 29, 2003
KitMaker: 651 posts
Armorama: 510 posts
Joined: October 29, 2003
KitMaker: 651 posts
Armorama: 510 posts
Posted: Friday, April 02, 2004 - 11:37 AM UTC
It has been said before but THANKS Pawel for putting so much effort in comparing the kits! It's very helpfull when you want to know wich Abrams to buy!!
(too bad you're writing this now and not 5 Beasts (mine) earlier... )
(too bad you're writing this now and not 5 Beasts (mine) earlier... )
Violetrock
European Union
Joined: March 09, 2003
KitMaker: 831 posts
Armorama: 791 posts
Joined: March 09, 2003
KitMaker: 831 posts
Armorama: 791 posts
Posted: Friday, April 02, 2004 - 07:18 PM UTC
Hi Vodnik,
again, great job you did!
Just as a little info, one picture is missing- the one that shows the business end of the coaxial machine gun. Text is there, but picture missing.
Thomas
again, great job you did!
Just as a little info, one picture is missing- the one that shows the business end of the coaxial machine gun. Text is there, but picture missing.
Thomas
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 03, 2004 - 05:50 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Just as a little info, one picture is missing- the one that shows the business end of the coaxial machine gun. Text is there, but picture missing.
The photo is definitely there, I just checked. Please try again, maybe some problem on the network made your browser cache incomplete version. You may need to delete temproary Internet files to see the web page from the server, not from your browser's cache.
Cheers,
Pawel
blaster76
Texas, United States
Joined: September 15, 2002
KitMaker: 8,985 posts
Armorama: 3,034 posts
Joined: September 15, 2002
KitMaker: 8,985 posts
Armorama: 3,034 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 03, 2004 - 07:11 AM UTC
Wish I had read your article before I chose my kit, I don't think I would have gotten the DML/Dragon version. Like the mine plow attachment though, and it was easy to put on. Hope you plan a segment featuring mine plow and roller add ons.
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 03, 2004 - 08:46 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Wish I had read your article before I chose my kit, I don't think I would have gotten the DML/Dragon version. Like the mine plow attachment though, and it was easy to put on. Hope you plan a segment featuring mine plow and roller add ons.
How was your DML kit? Could you confirm problems I mentioned in the article? I'm not sure if I'm fair calling the kit I use for the article "the Dragon kit", while it is actually Revel kit. There is a chance that mold quality of Revell boxing was worse than in original Dragon kit. I built Dragon kit many years ago, but don't remember how it went together - this means however that it was probably better than the kit I have now, otherwise I would have remembered.
I plan to mention all "extras" included in each of the kit in the last part of the article. In case of Revell/Dragon kit I will write about mine plow and for Trumpeter I will describe roller in a few words. But don't expect a very detailed description.
Regards,
Pawel
Jurgen
Limburg, Belgium
Joined: October 29, 2003
KitMaker: 651 posts
Armorama: 510 posts
Joined: October 29, 2003
KitMaker: 651 posts
Armorama: 510 posts
Posted: Saturday, April 03, 2004 - 11:25 AM UTC
Quoted Text
There is a chance that mold quality of Revell boxing was worse than in original Dragon kit.
Bought the new Dragon M1A1HA "Iraqi Freedom" and that had VERY much flash, so it couldn't be any better than Revell's...