Hosted by Darren Baker
2 gal POWs
b2nhvi
Nevada, United States
Joined: June 17, 2016
KitMaker: 1,124 posts
Armorama: 1,014 posts
Joined: June 17, 2016
KitMaker: 1,124 posts
Armorama: 1,014 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 07, 2020 - 12:01 PM UTC
I have a batch of POW cans left over from a couple Asuka Sherman kits. Working on Sherman IIb, Italy, late 44.(And have a Ic in the pipeline) Would these still have been in use then? Or would they have been supplanted by "Jerry " cans? What was the POW's time frame?
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 07, 2020 - 12:24 PM UTC
Gee!...and I thought he meant two female prisoners of war!
Posted: Tuesday, January 07, 2020 - 12:40 PM UTC
🤭
Posted: Tuesday, January 07, 2020 - 01:16 PM UTC
I wouldn't rule out POW's still in use alongside jerrycans in Italy.
Enough were made and sent over to the Med to stick around longer than they should have been. Resourceful British crews could also turn them into a field cooker. Cut the top off, fill it with sand and pour in some petrol. Stand well back and light!
Would make for an interesting addition to the stowage. A Churchill driver I once spoke to said it worked really well if you didn't mind the aftertaste of petrol.
I have some photos of British Shermans in Italy, so when I get a little time tomorrow I'll have a look and see what I can find.
Enough were made and sent over to the Med to stick around longer than they should have been. Resourceful British crews could also turn them into a field cooker. Cut the top off, fill it with sand and pour in some petrol. Stand well back and light!
Would make for an interesting addition to the stowage. A Churchill driver I once spoke to said it worked really well if you didn't mind the aftertaste of petrol.
I have some photos of British Shermans in Italy, so when I get a little time tomorrow I'll have a look and see what I can find.
b2nhvi
Nevada, United States
Joined: June 17, 2016
KitMaker: 1,124 posts
Armorama: 1,014 posts
Joined: June 17, 2016
KitMaker: 1,124 posts
Armorama: 1,014 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 07, 2020 - 03:16 PM UTC
These are not 4 gal. "Flimsies". They are 2 Gal. ,pressed steel. From what I
glean their design dates to WW1.
glean their design dates to WW1.
JohnTapsell
United Kingdom
Joined: August 24, 2011
KitMaker: 227 posts
Armorama: 226 posts
Joined: August 24, 2011
KitMaker: 227 posts
Armorama: 226 posts
Posted: Tuesday, January 07, 2020 - 07:34 PM UTC
The 2 Gallon POW cans were certainly still in use in NW Europe in 44-45. A quick hunt through my files shows them strapped to the back of Humber armoured cars in Greece in 1945 and also Humbers belonging to the Defence Company of the 8th Army HQ in September 1944.
I'm also pretty sure I've seen examples still in use during the Korean War.
Unlike the 4 gallon Flimsies, the 2 gallon cans were well designed and well made. They were popular and widely produced for the civilian market pre and post WWII.
John
I'm also pretty sure I've seen examples still in use during the Korean War.
Unlike the 4 gallon Flimsies, the 2 gallon cans were well designed and well made. They were popular and widely produced for the civilian market pre and post WWII.
John
Posted: Wednesday, January 08, 2020 - 12:11 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Gee!...and I thought he meant two female prisoners of war!
Ditto!
Posted: Wednesday, January 08, 2020 - 06:06 AM UTC
Bear in mind the "O" in POW stands for oil, so even if the petrol was now in jerrycans, there was stil a need for the smaller cans of engine oil and lube oil. And clean ones would still be useful as water cans. Might want to look at adding markings for the sake of the crew...
b2nhvi
Nevada, United States
Joined: June 17, 2016
KitMaker: 1,124 posts
Armorama: 1,014 posts
Joined: June 17, 2016
KitMaker: 1,124 posts
Armorama: 1,014 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 08, 2020 - 08:22 AM UTC
"even if the petrol was now in jerrycans,...... I was kinda wondering about that, if the smaller ones would be kept for stuff they didnt need 5 gals of. I read "water " cans were white or had a white cross. (no Klan jokes) Did they use them for anti freeze for water cooled engines? What markings? And for the sake of discussion, would there have been any Italian civilian ones? The oil companies were global octopi even back then. Would seem logical they were selling in Italy. And difference in markings?
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 08, 2020 - 08:58 AM UTC
Quoted Text
And for the sake of discussion, would there have been any Italian civilian ones? The oil companies were global octopi even back then. Would seem logical they were selling in Italy. And difference in markings?
Here's an 1935 Italian ad for Shell. Could it be a 2 Gallon can (I guess so ) ?
H.P.
JohnTapsell
United Kingdom
Joined: August 24, 2011
KitMaker: 227 posts
Armorama: 226 posts
Joined: August 24, 2011
KitMaker: 227 posts
Armorama: 226 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 08, 2020 - 09:27 AM UTC
It's not unlikely that the occasional civvie 2 gallon can was 'liberated' so it can always make a nice contrast on your model. Yes, water cans were sometimes painted white and again, that offers some variation on a model.
Oil and lubricants tended to be supplied in 1 gallon cans from what I can remember (same height as the 2 gallon cans but half the length (they were square when viewed from above rather than rectangular).
Ultracast does the 1 gallon cans in 1/35 - https://www.ultracast.ca/product-p/ult135013.htm
John
Oil and lubricants tended to be supplied in 1 gallon cans from what I can remember (same height as the 2 gallon cans but half the length (they were square when viewed from above rather than rectangular).
Ultracast does the 1 gallon cans in 1/35 - https://www.ultracast.ca/product-p/ult135013.htm
John
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 08, 2020 - 11:57 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Here's an 1935 Italian ad for Shell. Could it be a 2 Gallon can (I guess so ) ?
H.P.
More likely eight liters - I don't think they use gallons, etc. much in Europe.
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Wednesday, January 08, 2020 - 08:52 PM UTC
I agree we use liters instead but 2 Gallons = 9.09 liters so it's not too far off the mark
I guess it depends on the can manufacturer nationality...
H.P.
I guess it depends on the can manufacturer nationality...
H.P.
Posted: Friday, January 10, 2020 - 08:00 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I agree we use liters instead but 2 Gallons = 9.09 liters so it's not too far off the mark
I guess it depends on the can manufacturer nationality...
H.P.
And, of course, it depends on which "gallon" you are referring to. The Commonwealth/Imperial gallon is approx 5 litres, whereas the Yank gallon is approx only 4. An Imperial quart being 40 oz versus the Yank quart being only 32. So the standard 20 litre Jerrycan is 5 US gallons but only about 4.5 Imperial gallons.
Which, of course, means one must always order your beer in Imperial 20 oz pints, not the wee, tiny Yank 16 oz ones!
Paul