Hosted by Darren Baker
Best base kit for M45?
HermannB
Bayern, Germany
Joined: October 14, 2008
KitMaker: 4,099 posts
Armorama: 4,067 posts
Joined: October 14, 2008
KitMaker: 4,099 posts
Armorama: 4,067 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 - 05:01 PM UTC
I have Accurate Armours M45 conversion in my stash and wonder which base kit is better? Tamiya or HobbyBoss?
jon_a_its
England - East Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: April 29, 2004
KitMaker: 1,336 posts
Armorama: 1,137 posts
Joined: April 29, 2004
KitMaker: 1,336 posts
Armorama: 1,137 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 - 07:18 PM UTC
the Accurate Armour C076 US Army M45 Howitzer Tank page for this conversion says...
" This extensive 1/35th scale conversion transforms the Tamiya M26 Pershing Heavy Tank into the Post WW-2 M45 105mm Howitzer Tank which was used extensively in Korea."
The conversion is mainly track & turret, but the rear engine compartment plate may give you issues if using the Dragon kit. The Tamiya kit is a very nice build, btw.
" This extensive 1/35th scale conversion transforms the Tamiya M26 Pershing Heavy Tank into the Post WW-2 M45 105mm Howitzer Tank which was used extensively in Korea."
The conversion is mainly track & turret, but the rear engine compartment plate may give you issues if using the Dragon kit. The Tamiya kit is a very nice build, btw.
kaleu
Indiana, United States
Joined: June 11, 2003
KitMaker: 123 posts
Armorama: 112 posts
Joined: June 11, 2003
KitMaker: 123 posts
Armorama: 112 posts
Posted: Thursday, June 11, 2020 - 05:27 AM UTC
I used the Tamiya kit for this conversion and I didn't have any problems.
KurtLaughlin
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Friday, June 12, 2020 - 12:33 AM UTC
The real challenge is getting the turret right. It was a different casting than the gun tanks.
KL
KL
RobinNilsson
TOS Moderator
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Friday, June 12, 2020 - 01:46 AM UTC
Quoted Text
The real challenge is getting the turret right. It was a different casting than the gun tanks.
KL
Accurate Armours product page:
https://accurate-armour.com/aa-products/135th-conversion-sets/c076
KurtLaughlin
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Friday, June 12, 2020 - 01:02 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextThe real challenge is getting the turret right. It was a different casting than the gun tanks.
KL
Accurate Armours product page:
https://accurate-armour.com/aa-products/135th-conversion-sets/c076
Yeah, I saw that. Including a replacement turret doesn't mean anything. They could've made a new turret just so the mantlet dust cover fit well.
I'm not going to review AA's turret off a couple of pictures. Just consider this though: The T26E2/M45 turret was constructed more like that on the M4A3E2 than on the T26E3/M26. The base and sides were cast as one piece and the roof added from flat plate. On the M45 there was one horizontal plate from the transverse centerline rearwards to the point where the bustle started (this included both hatch openings) and a second plate sloping down to make the bustle roof. This construction is visible in the overhead photograph in Hunnicutt's Pershing book, as is the casting part number, 7055446. (The normal Pershing turret was 7054408.)
Here's a close view of the AA turret from an online build: https://leicestermodellers.weebly.com/uploads/8/0/9/7/8097807/546130_orig.jpg
KL