Hosted by Darren Baker
British-use FWD Truck
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Friday, September 11, 2020 - 02:48 AM UTC
I read that the British military bought a bunch of American FWD trucks for their military before the USA officially entered the war. So what color were they, how were they marked, etc.? I don't know if the ICM kit provides that.
Kevlar06
Washington, United States
Joined: March 15, 2009
KitMaker: 3,670 posts
Armorama: 2,052 posts
Joined: March 15, 2009
KitMaker: 3,670 posts
Armorama: 2,052 posts
Posted: Friday, September 11, 2020 - 04:43 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I read that the British military bought a bunch of American FWD trucks for their military before the USA officially entered the war. So what color were they, how were they marked, etc.? I don't know if the ICM kit provides that.
Take a look here Tom. The IWM has an example, pictured in the Wiki article below. Looks like the standard British Khaki Green. Some nice photos in the article too, including some of FWDs towing the 8” BL Howitzer, which seems to be a common lash-up:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FWD_Model_B
VR, Russ
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Friday, September 11, 2020 - 05:04 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextI read that the British military bought a bunch of American FWD trucks for their military before the USA officially entered the war. So what color were they, how were they marked, etc.? I don't know if the ICM kit provides that.
Take a look here Tom. The IWM has an example, pictured in the Wiki article below. Looks like the standard British Khaki Green. Some nice photos in the article too, including some of FWDs towing the 8” BL Howitzer, which seems to be a common lash-up:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/FWD_Model_B
VR, Russ
Thanks. I remember seeing that article in the past, but for the life of me could not find it recently. If no markings, then fine, I already have a resin British soldier driver.
RLlockie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Posted: Friday, September 11, 2020 - 06:51 AM UTC
The HAR 1 was used to tow smoke generator trailers used in the Rhine crossing. Markings details were in a Tankette article decades ago, accessible if you’re a MAFVA member (www.mafva.org)
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Friday, September 11, 2020 - 07:39 AM UTC
I didn't know they crossed the Rhine River during WW1.
MoramarthT
United Kingdom
Joined: June 30, 2020
KitMaker: 4 posts
Armorama: 2 posts
Joined: June 30, 2020
KitMaker: 4 posts
Armorama: 2 posts
Posted: Friday, September 11, 2020 - 04:44 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I don't know if the ICM kit provides that.
I understand the ICM kit represents a US steel bodied item. The British imported theirs as a cab & chassis and added their own bodies as required, usually a wooden GS type.
Regards,
M
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 12, 2020 - 01:53 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextI don't know if the ICM kit provides that.
I understand the ICM kit represents a US steel bodied item. The British imported theirs as a cab & chassis and added their own bodies as required, usually a wooden GS type.
Regards,
M
Thanks for the heads up.
RLlockie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 12, 2020 - 05:22 AM UTC
It wasn’t obvious to me that the question was about WW1. Given that the US was a late arrival twice.....
long_tom
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Joined: March 18, 2006
KitMaker: 2,362 posts
Armorama: 2,005 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 12, 2020 - 05:51 AM UTC
Quoted Text
It wasn’t obvious to me that the question was about WW1. Given that the US was a late arrival twice.....
Contrary to popular myth, the USA did help the Allies before Pearl Harbor, although in secret. Only having Hitler and Tojo declaring war on us could we do open fighting.
RLlockie
United Kingdom
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Joined: September 06, 2013
KitMaker: 1,112 posts
Armorama: 938 posts
Posted: Saturday, September 12, 2020 - 11:25 PM UTC
Indeed. Actually I wasn’t aware of that myth, given that the USN was involved in convoy escort in the Battle of the Atlantic well before the end of 1941 as any decent history of the battle makes clear. USN sailors on warships also died before the US and Germany was officially at war, notably on the USS Reuben James.
KurtLaughlin
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,402 posts
Armorama: 2,377 posts
Posted: Sunday, September 13, 2020 - 11:03 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Contrary to popular myth, the USA did help the Allies before Pearl Harbor, although in secret.
I believe US aid was well-known. For example:
> The "Cash and Carry" policy was enacted in November, 1939.
> "President Roosevelt approved $25 million in military aid to China on 19 December 1940, permitting the Chinese to purchase one hundred P-40 pursuit aircraft." - China Defensive (https://history.army.mil/brochures/72-38/72-38.htm)
> Lend-Lease was enacted in March of 1941.
All of these actions were publicized at the time.
KL
RobinNilsson
TOS Moderator
Stockholm, Sweden
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Joined: November 29, 2006
KitMaker: 6,693 posts
Armorama: 5,562 posts
Posted: Monday, September 14, 2020 - 04:53 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextContrary to popular myth, the USA did help the Allies before Pearl Harbor, although in secret.
I believe US aid was well-known. For example:
> The "Cash and Carry" policy was enacted in November, 1939.
> "President Roosevelt approved $25 million in military aid to China on 19 December 1940, permitting the Chinese to purchase one hundred P-40 pursuit aircraft." - China Defensive (https://history.army.mil/brochures/72-38/72-38.htm)
> Lend-Lease was enacted in March of 1941.
All of these actions were publicized at the time.
KL
Going to war in the 'all-in' fashion wasn't possible due to the home front not being particularly interested in going to war (nobody in their right mind is ....).
The attack on Pearl Harbor changed the domestic situation and the US could enter 'for real'