I am attempting to build a 1/72-scale model of the M48 in Vietnam, complete with sandbag protection over most of the turret. I assume this would noticeably affect the ride height of the vehicle. Can anyone suggest what the ground clearance would be (either on the real tank or the scale model), so that I can position the suspension arms accordingly?
Paul
Hosted by Darren Baker
M48 Ride Height ...
pbennett
United Kingdom
Joined: October 14, 2007
KitMaker: 464 posts
Armorama: 412 posts
Joined: October 14, 2007
KitMaker: 464 posts
Armorama: 412 posts
Posted: Monday, October 19, 2020 - 05:54 AM UTC
Removed by original poster on 10/19/20 - 21:13:50 (GMT).
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Monday, October 19, 2020 - 02:41 PM UTC
stikpusher
Arizona, United States
Joined: June 16, 2005
KitMaker: 83 posts
Armorama: 79 posts
Joined: June 16, 2005
KitMaker: 83 posts
Armorama: 79 posts
Posted: Monday, October 19, 2020 - 03:11 PM UTC
The sandbags do not compress the suspension much. But when dozer blades are attached the front is weighed down significantly.
pbennett
United Kingdom
Joined: October 14, 2007
KitMaker: 464 posts
Armorama: 412 posts
Joined: October 14, 2007
KitMaker: 464 posts
Armorama: 412 posts
Posted: Monday, October 19, 2020 - 11:19 PM UTC
Excellent ... many thanks.
Paul
Paul
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 22, 2020 - 02:21 PM UTC
Quoted Text
The sandbags do not compress the suspension much. But when dozer blades are attached the front is weighed down significantly.
I doubt you'd see two inches total. Then to compound the idea; the ground was often so soft that it would give away before the suspension gave away much. Stik is correct about the Rome & Plow tanks. I suspect it comes from the fulcrum points being near the front road wheel. Have only seen a couple 48's with bags stacked like that. Seems like they were Marine units running mine sweeps with Army units on Highway One. CAV units hardly ever bothered up my way.
gary
warmonger
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: November 08, 2006
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 117 posts
Joined: November 08, 2006
KitMaker: 217 posts
Armorama: 117 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 22, 2020 - 08:42 PM UTC
The pic above is an Army M-48 with sandbags.
trickymissfit
Joined: October 03, 2007
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
KitMaker: 1,388 posts
Armorama: 1,357 posts
Posted: Friday, October 23, 2020 - 12:26 PM UTC
Quoted Text
The pic above is an Army M-48 with sandbags.
as I said I just never saw them with a lot of bags piled on them. Those guys are doing somekind of road security, and probably way down south. Not many roads that good up north. Plus with added weight, your gonna be digging that thing out when you leave the roads. A bare 48 had a lot of the same issues, so why compound it with more tonnage. Up north, 48's were limited to hard soils and trails. Where as an ACAV or Sheridan could make it thru 70% of everything. Just ain't a lot of fun digging a 52 ton tank buried to the hull bottom out. Even a bone dry rice paddy will get you, and many times even an ACAV.
gary