Hi there...
Just now I'm tinkering with a Tamiya M113A" Desert version. I would like to do a little detailing on this and have some questions:
Weld seams..... are thereany that should be added to the model (e.g. top plate and hul???)
How are the CIP fastened on to the side?
Etc. Etc.
I was hoping to avoid PE and resin stuff and basically do an OOB but some detailing I feel would enhance the model somewhat.
Any tips or reference photos anyone?
Rgds Grenade
Hosted by Darren Baker
DETAILING M113A2 (TAM)- NEED TIPS
Grenade
Akershus, Norway
Joined: August 31, 2003
KitMaker: 29 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: August 31, 2003
KitMaker: 29 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Friday, June 25, 2004 - 10:14 PM UTC
kglack43
Alabama, United States
Joined: September 18, 2003
KitMaker: 842 posts
Armorama: 607 posts
Joined: September 18, 2003
KitMaker: 842 posts
Armorama: 607 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 26, 2004 - 12:09 AM UTC
you can try this link...
http://www.armouredengineer.force9.co.uk/bucket/index.htm
and, WELCOME to the site
http://www.armouredengineer.force9.co.uk/bucket/index.htm
and, WELCOME to the site
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 26, 2004 - 01:57 AM UTC
I've got several walk around shots of M113A2 and M113A3s in my motor pool. There is also a side-by-side comparison of an M113A2 and M113A3 that shows the differences in various fittings.
Click the banner below.
Click the banner below.
keenan
Indiana, United States
Joined: October 16, 2002
KitMaker: 5,272 posts
Armorama: 2,844 posts
Joined: October 16, 2002
KitMaker: 5,272 posts
Armorama: 2,844 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 26, 2004 - 02:21 AM UTC
Quick question, because I just purchased the same kit:
The M113A2 doesn't have external fuel cells and the M113A3 does? Is that correct? That is the impression I got from your walk around photos Rob. An article at the FAS website says the same thing. If that is the case then what is in the box is really an M113A3?
Thanks in advance for the help.
Shaun
Link the the FAS article follows:
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m113.htm
The M113A2 doesn't have external fuel cells and the M113A3 does? Is that correct? That is the impression I got from your walk around photos Rob. An article at the FAS website says the same thing. If that is the case then what is in the box is really an M113A3?
Thanks in advance for the help.
Shaun
Link the the FAS article follows:
http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/land/m113.htm
Frenchy
Rhone, France
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 26, 2004 - 02:56 AM UTC
I'm not Rob, but my answer is based on what he told me when I asked the same question some times ago : the Tamiya kit can be seen as a made-in-japan "hybrid" variant of A2 fitted with A3 external fuel tanks, but it lacks other A3 features (if you want to build one) like the add-on armor plates on the front of the hull (clearly visible on Rob's pics) and other less noticeable ones like the treaded holes for the add-on armor kit on the hull sides....
The A3 interior is also different, but you can keep the hatches closed
Frenchy (sorry for jumping on the band wagon)
The A3 interior is also different, but you can keep the hatches closed
Frenchy (sorry for jumping on the band wagon)
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 26, 2004 - 03:00 AM UTC
US M113A2s do not have external fuel cells, with the exception of the M1068 mortar carrier and M981 FIST-V. Canadian M113A2s do use external fuel cells.
I have not peeked inside the Tamiya box, but from afar it looks like Tamiya gave you some updated bits and pieces to add to their old M113A1 kit to attempt to cosmetically make an M113A3. But, minus the fuel cells it probably is closer to an actual M113A2.
I have not peeked inside the Tamiya box, but from afar it looks like Tamiya gave you some updated bits and pieces to add to their old M113A1 kit to attempt to cosmetically make an M113A3. But, minus the fuel cells it probably is closer to an actual M113A2.
keenan
Indiana, United States
Joined: October 16, 2002
KitMaker: 5,272 posts
Armorama: 2,844 posts
Joined: October 16, 2002
KitMaker: 5,272 posts
Armorama: 2,844 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 26, 2004 - 03:20 AM UTC
Thanks everyone. Sorry for the threadjack...
Shaun
Shaun
Grenade
Akershus, Norway
Joined: August 31, 2003
KitMaker: 29 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: August 31, 2003
KitMaker: 29 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, June 26, 2004 - 08:35 PM UTC
Why does Tamiya always seem to do a little cheating when releasing upgraded versions of earlier models
Will I be severely punished if i build it with the fuel tanks and call it an A3 Dont tell - dont tell
Will I be severely punished if i build it with the fuel tanks and call it an A3 Dont tell - dont tell
Trackjam
Ontario, Canada
Joined: April 12, 2002
KitMaker: 831 posts
Armorama: 614 posts
Joined: April 12, 2002
KitMaker: 831 posts
Armorama: 614 posts
Posted: Sunday, June 27, 2004 - 02:47 AM UTC
I believe the major differences between an A2 and A3 (apart from external fuel cells) are internal. A steering yoke instead of tiller bars is an immediate visible difference. Our A3s are painted white and have a lot more internal armour , spall liners and so on. However some countries have gone to a new Deihl double pin stainless steel track, which is different from the earlier Deihl track in that the enf connectors do not have the extensions as did the earlier track and the pads are not alternately offset.