I will shortly be posting a new article by Werner (tankbuster) on his Churchill AVRE tank.
Churchill AVRE Conversion
As usual if you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks Werner! And tell Wolfram that he has outdone himself on these pics. Most excellent! (as is your tank!)
Cheers,
Jim
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
FEATURE: Churchill AVRE
Posted: Sunday, August 04, 2002 - 01:42 PM UTC
Tin_Can
Florida, United States
Joined: January 26, 2002
KitMaker: 1,560 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: January 26, 2002
KitMaker: 1,560 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 04, 2002 - 07:36 PM UTC
Werner,
True to fashion...another excellent piece of work. You provide great inspiration for us all! I love the way the tracks have been 'muddied' up.
True to fashion...another excellent piece of work. You provide great inspiration for us all! I love the way the tracks have been 'muddied' up.
E23C
Ontario, Canada
Joined: January 23, 2002
KitMaker: 238 posts
Armorama: 142 posts
Joined: January 23, 2002
KitMaker: 238 posts
Armorama: 142 posts
Posted: Monday, August 05, 2002 - 10:44 AM UTC
Werner, A fantastic job on the AVRE!! Quite a conversion which looks great.
Thanks for posting the great article.
Thanks for posting the great article.
otto
Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Joined: June 30, 2002
KitMaker: 72 posts
Armorama: 50 posts
Joined: June 30, 2002
KitMaker: 72 posts
Armorama: 50 posts
Posted: Monday, August 05, 2002 - 12:35 PM UTC
Fantastic!! Otto
Posted: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 - 01:19 AM UTC
Werner,
Very nice work
Only a small comment about a phrase in the article:
Acording to my sources the bobbins had a strong reinforced canvas and are deployed by the tank for itself and the following ones could move in some of the beaches where the ground it's too soft for them.
Very nice work
Only a small comment about a phrase in the article:
Quoted Text
...
While I was examining photos I discovered, that all Churchill AVRE’s with Petard-Mortar had strange holders fixed on the side sponson. I was puzzled about the functionality, as they were too delicate to carry a dozer but finally I got the conclusion.
The holders were intended to fix a frame for a bobbin of canvas designed to lay a 10ft. wide carpet over soft sand. Infantry was due to follow the tank on this carpet. After landing these bobbins were removed from the tanks.
...
Acording to my sources the bobbins had a strong reinforced canvas and are deployed by the tank for itself and the following ones could move in some of the beaches where the ground it's too soft for them.
210cav
Virginia, United States
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 6,149 posts
Armorama: 4,573 posts
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 6,149 posts
Armorama: 4,573 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 06, 2002 - 02:15 AM UTC
Werner--Danke. Great job as always.
DJ
DJ
Posted: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 - 01:48 PM UTC
I hope everyone is going all the way to the END of the article. That's where all the finished pics are.
Really I don't understand why this article has been read so much less than others. Is the Churchill that disliked??
Jim
Really I don't understand why this article has been read so much less than others. Is the Churchill that disliked??
Jim
Kencelot
Florida, United States
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 - 05:29 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Really I don't understand why this article has been read so much less than others. Is the Churchill that disliked??
No Jim. I was stuck at work for the past month and am now just discovering it!
Very, very nice job Werner! I love it's ugliness so much it's beautiful. Really!
BlueBear
Idaho, United States
Joined: August 26, 2002
KitMaker: 414 posts
Armorama: 148 posts
Joined: August 26, 2002
KitMaker: 414 posts
Armorama: 148 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 - 06:25 PM UTC
I've always found the Churchill interesting. I have a couple 1/72 AVRE's with small box-girder bridges, an AMRCR, a Mk. 7, a Mk. 1 and a Mk. 2CS. If you want, its not impossible to make the full AVRE family. A facine carrier would be an easy mod for the old Matchbox AVRE and once you got the framework for the bobbin made, the matting wouldn't be hard to do---just check your local fabric shop, same for material for netting and base for hessian.
It would be nice if someone out there in the world made detail parts to help us out some with small scale mods and conversions. I'm looking for 2 sets of production air intakes to graft onto a Hasagawa Mk. 1 and a Mk. 2CS for a Deippe diorama without having to cannibilize from other kits.
It would be nice if someone out there in the world made detail parts to help us out some with small scale mods and conversions. I'm looking for 2 sets of production air intakes to graft onto a Hasagawa Mk. 1 and a Mk. 2CS for a Deippe diorama without having to cannibilize from other kits.
AVRE165
England - South East, United Kingdom
Joined: December 31, 2002
KitMaker: 181 posts
Armorama: 145 posts
Joined: December 31, 2002
KitMaker: 181 posts
Armorama: 145 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 07:40 AM UTC
hi
may i say it is finished very nicely but!!
to be correct.
the main two points i have on the tank are :- (1) you have forgot to include the sliding Loaders hatch . this is where the Petard was loaded.
(2) no AVRE that i have seen photographs or from crew man or my farther would ever fit a tool box on the rear everything was tied on the rear. main reason was because of fitting of the winch. some stowage boxes were fitted here but they had two "u" shape bits of metal which went in to the grills.
historic notes.
designed by Lt Deneveon Candian ME Company after the failure of Dieppie.
the Petard was always called a flying Dustbin or Petard.
a Wade Charge is a seperate charge stowed in side in the pannier doors to which the crew would climb out & attach to a obsticale to be destroyed.
the fixings on the side are the CIRD fittings used as rightly said for attaching differant equipments. these were not fitted to Italian AVRE's,
nice looking model ossie
may i say it is finished very nicely but!!
to be correct.
the main two points i have on the tank are :- (1) you have forgot to include the sliding Loaders hatch . this is where the Petard was loaded.
(2) no AVRE that i have seen photographs or from crew man or my farther would ever fit a tool box on the rear everything was tied on the rear. main reason was because of fitting of the winch. some stowage boxes were fitted here but they had two "u" shape bits of metal which went in to the grills.
historic notes.
designed by Lt Deneveon Candian ME Company after the failure of Dieppie.
the Petard was always called a flying Dustbin or Petard.
a Wade Charge is a seperate charge stowed in side in the pannier doors to which the crew would climb out & attach to a obsticale to be destroyed.
the fixings on the side are the CIRD fittings used as rightly said for attaching differant equipments. these were not fitted to Italian AVRE's,
nice looking model ossie
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / España
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 07:49 AM UTC
I never saw the feature....pity really as it is truly brilliant.....Jim
zer0_co0l
Limburg, Netherlands
Joined: January 04, 2003
KitMaker: 1,432 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: January 04, 2003
KitMaker: 1,432 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 08:46 AM UTC
woah cool thats the churchill thats on my british tanks rule tshirt.!!!!
cooool nice piece of work!
cooool nice piece of work!
Graywolf
Senior Editor
Izmir, Turkey / Türkçe
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 6,405 posts
Armorama: 1,850 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 6,405 posts
Armorama: 1,850 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 07:10 PM UTC
I first read this article as I see in the Dutch forum translating the Dutch article to English,glad to see the original now . The built ,the article and translation was all great :-)
congrats Werner and Juul.
congrats Werner and Juul.
Major_Goose
Kikladhes, Greece / Ελλάδα
Joined: September 30, 2003
KitMaker: 6,871 posts
Armorama: 2,071 posts
Joined: September 30, 2003
KitMaker: 6,871 posts
Armorama: 2,071 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 18, 2004 - 07:39 PM UTC
Now finishing my Churchill Crocodile , the mudding tracks work has been usefull to me and i have seen this article time ago . Very good work
mikeli125
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,595 posts
Armorama: 1,209 posts
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,595 posts
Armorama: 1,209 posts
Posted: Friday, March 19, 2004 - 06:21 AM UTC
good article as resicast do a conversion for it as well and I think cromwell are supposed to be doing one Legend also has a conversion kit as well thinking of doing one got 3 churchhill tucked away and needing built!