Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
The brand new ARMY Stryker
TimberWolf
California, United States
Joined: July 15, 2002
KitMaker: 225 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: July 15, 2002
KitMaker: 225 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 - 04:23 AM UTC
The Stryker is an Infantry Carrier Vehicle that is brand new :-) I hope they come out with a model soon You can see it here! .....hey Sabot tell me when you get one at the motor pool
Sancho0409
Michigan, United States
Joined: July 25, 2002
KitMaker: 145 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: July 25, 2002
KitMaker: 145 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 - 04:29 AM UTC
It reminds me of old-schoolamo Rambo toys that I used to have, but looks sweet.
GunTruck
California, United States
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 5,885 posts
Armorama: 3,799 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 5,885 posts
Armorama: 3,799 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 - 05:30 AM UTC
Mmmmmmm - would love to have a model of that...
Wheeled AFV's are great!
Gunnie
Wheeled AFV's are great!
Gunnie
armyfiremn
United States
Joined: June 14, 2002
KitMaker: 90 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: June 14, 2002
KitMaker: 90 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 - 12:12 PM UTC
timber i got pics already of the stryker just email me or leave me a message and i'll send them your way if you want them
TimberWolf
California, United States
Joined: July 15, 2002
KitMaker: 225 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: July 15, 2002
KitMaker: 225 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 - 12:45 PM UTC
Got the photos, Thanks a million
MLD
Vermont, United States
Joined: July 21, 2002
KitMaker: 3,569 posts
Armorama: 2,070 posts
Joined: July 21, 2002
KitMaker: 3,569 posts
Armorama: 2,070 posts
Posted: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 - 08:25 PM UTC
It looks a little Fuchs/Luchs-ish.. now if only someone other than Revell Germany would release one, so we don't spend 47 steps building the suspension.
DML is out too, since they would do the whole suspension in 3 parts
Skif's would have a toylike interior , Trumpeters wouldn't take glue..
Academy would copy Tamiya's and then reference non-existant paints..
Ok, Tamiya it is... for US$75!!!!
-grin-
Mike
DML is out too, since they would do the whole suspension in 3 parts
Skif's would have a toylike interior , Trumpeters wouldn't take glue..
Academy would copy Tamiya's and then reference non-existant paints..
Ok, Tamiya it is... for US$75!!!!
-grin-
Mike
drewgimpy
Utah, United States
Joined: January 24, 2002
KitMaker: 835 posts
Armorama: 388 posts
Joined: January 24, 2002
KitMaker: 835 posts
Armorama: 388 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 - 09:51 AM UTC
Does it have any fire power or is it just a transport? Looks sorta like a large wheeled m113 to me as far as what its built for. Is that about right or am I missing something. Looks like it would be a fun build though.
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 - 10:22 AM UTC
Drew, there are several variants, about a dozen, including a mortar carrier, mobile gun system, infantry support, etc.
armyfiremn
United States
Joined: June 14, 2002
KitMaker: 90 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: June 14, 2002
KitMaker: 90 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 21, 2002 - 10:24 AM UTC
drew there's two versions here on ft lewis one is the mobile gun system the other is the troop carrier which i have pictures of if you would like i can send them to you
SEDimmick
New Jersey, United States
Joined: March 15, 2002
KitMaker: 1,745 posts
Armorama: 1,483 posts
Joined: March 15, 2002
KitMaker: 1,745 posts
Armorama: 1,483 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 22, 2002 - 08:48 AM UTC
Heres a article out of the Army Times about the Stryker:
Quoted Text
Army Transformation Experiment 2002, small part of Millennium Challenge 2002, Joint Forces Command exercise July 24 to Aug 15.
800-plus paratroopers of a battalion task force, 1st Battalion, 325th Airborne Infantry Regiment, 82nd Airborne Division seized an airstrip.
14 Strykers from A Company, 5th Battalion, 20th Infantry Regiment, 3rd Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division streamed in immediately behind the airborne task force.
The Stryker company was not allowed to cross the line of departure before airstrikes had destoryed enemy tanks. The remaining OPFOR consisted of BMP-2s and BRDMs.
A 110-kilometer movement was conducted without lossing any Stryers or refueling.
"If an Abrams tank unit conducted a six-hour move towards an objective, it would have to stop and refuel before attacking." (per Major Paul Calvert)
The Stryker company conducted three night engagements.
1. seized a weapons of mass effects site, lost two or three vehicles.
2. seized a theater ballistic-missile launcher, lost five vehicles.
3. seized a command-and-control position with 2 BMP-2s, 2 BRDMs and 15 soldiers, no vehicles lost.
7 or 8 vehicles out of 14 lost during three opeartions?
I found the following quote interesting. By a Major Paul Calvert, OPFOR's operations officer.
"It's probably one of the most mobile vehicles we've seen here. Traditionally the most agile vehicles in the maneuver "box" at NTC are the Humvees of the post's observer-controllers, who monitor the battles and mentor the leaders at every level of the units who come here to train. That doggone Stryker could go anywhere an OC could go, and could do it more quickly. Far from hindering the Stryker's mobility, its wheels actually give it an edge over tracked systems. I saw Strykers going some places that I hadn't seen mech companies go before. That was probably the single most impressive thing I saw about the Stryker - its ability to move in really crappy terrain."
Pfc. Shawn Harper, a driver, said they got the vehicle up to 64 miles per hour during a day light test drive. During the (night) missions, he drove at 40 miles per hour, using the thermal night vision sights.
AFV engagment technique started out with stopping the vehicle, waiting for the ramp to go down and unstrapping the Javelins, dismount, find cover and reacquire the targets. The infantry found it was better for the Javelin gunners to stand up in the hatchs, each one scanning their side of the vehicle, and engage as soon as the vehicle had stopped.
A comment about the road march
Per Sgt. Steven Schneider, "You get very sore, it's pretty cramped in there. It's not the most comfortable ride, but it's better than walking."