Hosted by Darren Baker
A real heavy hauler
animal
Joined: December 15, 2002
KitMaker: 4,503 posts
Armorama: 3,159 posts
KitMaker: 4,503 posts
Armorama: 3,159 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 26, 2004 - 08:01 AM UTC
I think that this could be classified as a really heavy hauler.
generalzod
United States
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 3,172 posts
Armorama: 2,495 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 3,172 posts
Armorama: 2,495 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 26, 2004 - 08:18 AM UTC
Neat pic Dave I wonder if that's some type of new truck
I wonder why it has civilian tread on front tires but military pattern on rear Curious to see what the function is of the crane and what type of stuff that trailer hauls
I wonder why it has civilian tread on front tires but military pattern on rear Curious to see what the function is of the crane and what type of stuff that trailer hauls
animal
Joined: December 15, 2002
KitMaker: 4,503 posts
Armorama: 3,159 posts
KitMaker: 4,503 posts
Armorama: 3,159 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 26, 2004 - 03:10 PM UTC
The truck is the M-819 recovery truck. It is built on the M-800 five ton series truck. It is capable hauling different types of trailers as well as pulling a disabled tractor or cargo truck. This is not a new truck and the civilian tread tires on the front is a common practice on military trucks that are used on the road. We used them back in the mid 1960's on a lot of our trucks in Nam. It gives the driver a better ride and makes it control a little easier.The trailer is the M-269A1. I have never hauled this type of trailer so I am not sure what it was designed for .
MrRoo
Queensland, Australia
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 26, 2004 - 04:25 PM UTC
now I could have used one of those to haul all the WW2 trucks that got scrapped 200 clicks from here back in June home (LOL) :-)
Cheers
Cliff
PS> Dave you started your heavy hauler yet?
Cheers
Cliff
PS> Dave you started your heavy hauler yet?
animal
Joined: December 15, 2002
KitMaker: 4,503 posts
Armorama: 3,159 posts
KitMaker: 4,503 posts
Armorama: 3,159 posts
Posted: Monday, December 27, 2004 - 05:15 AM UTC
This is my first project for this campaign. There are a lot of parts in this box. Is there anything that I should be aware of. Any little problems that I should be aware of during the build?
jRatz
North Carolina, United States
Joined: March 06, 2004
KitMaker: 1,171 posts
Armorama: 541 posts
Joined: March 06, 2004
KitMaker: 1,171 posts
Armorama: 541 posts
Posted: Monday, December 27, 2004 - 06:25 AM UTC
Dave:
The M819 was a crane/wrecker with slightly longer boom than the "pure" 816 wrecker. While technically capable of supply & materiel handling, etc, in my world (1970's, 3AD, 1ID) I only saw them in aviation units.
The M269 was a 12-ton trailer IIRC designed for recovery & hauling of aircraft. There was also an M270 which was longer. I believe that I also saw the M269 in aviation units & believe that an M819 pulling/loading an M269 with a busted up whirly-bird would be valid.
I have TM's for all the above in pdf format; if you would like them, PM me your snail mail address & I'll send a CD.
The M819 was a crane/wrecker with slightly longer boom than the "pure" 816 wrecker. While technically capable of supply & materiel handling, etc, in my world (1970's, 3AD, 1ID) I only saw them in aviation units.
The M269 was a 12-ton trailer IIRC designed for recovery & hauling of aircraft. There was also an M270 which was longer. I believe that I also saw the M269 in aviation units & believe that an M819 pulling/loading an M269 with a busted up whirly-bird would be valid.
I have TM's for all the above in pdf format; if you would like them, PM me your snail mail address & I'll send a CD.
animal
Joined: December 15, 2002
KitMaker: 4,503 posts
Armorama: 3,159 posts
KitMaker: 4,503 posts
Armorama: 3,159 posts
Posted: Monday, December 27, 2004 - 07:21 AM UTC
Thanks a million for the information. I did not know any of this about the truck or the trailer. It congers up some ideas for a build now.
straightedge
Ohio, United States
Joined: January 18, 2004
KitMaker: 1,352 posts
Armorama: 629 posts
Joined: January 18, 2004
KitMaker: 1,352 posts
Armorama: 629 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 28, 2004 - 01:16 AM UTC
Hey Dave, I remember some of the old guys that used to have some of them old stationary axle, step decks. Before the 45' and 48' footers came along, them used to be real neck breakers.
Sense you couldn't slide the axles up the main part of the load was in the middle, and the flex of the floor would just beat you to death. You wouldn't think that little flex would mean that much, but once it was transfered all them feet to the cab, it really got to shaking by the time it got to the cab. It was really hard to get a load that road good.
You would hit a big bump, and keep feeling it minutes later, and usually if the guy could only afford a trailer like that, he had a tractor with only a solid rubber block Hendrickson suspension on his tractor to, and never could find anybody to take a ride with him to the truck stop, during off time hours.
Kerry
Sense you couldn't slide the axles up the main part of the load was in the middle, and the flex of the floor would just beat you to death. You wouldn't think that little flex would mean that much, but once it was transfered all them feet to the cab, it really got to shaking by the time it got to the cab. It was really hard to get a load that road good.
You would hit a big bump, and keep feeling it minutes later, and usually if the guy could only afford a trailer like that, he had a tractor with only a solid rubber block Hendrickson suspension on his tractor to, and never could find anybody to take a ride with him to the truck stop, during off time hours.
Kerry