Between the DML T-26E3 and the Tamiya Pershing, Which one is the best example to build? I was curious as to others opinions on these.

Thanks
Deacon

It kinda depends on what you like and what you look for in a model. Both are excellent, but neither is without some faults.

Here's a side-by-side comparison: http://www5b.biglobe.ne.jp/~TANK-GUY/kit-rev/KIT-REVIEW08.html

Also, check out the Perth Military Modeling Society site at: http://www.perthmilitarymodelling.com/ PMMS has excellent reviews.

I don't have the Tamiya kit, but I am currently building the DML T-26E3. I added some casting numbers using the Academy accessory sprues (included in the M-10 kit and others), as well as parts (some, but not all) from the Eduard M-26 set. I made the canvas mantle cover with Milliputt and strip styrene. I'm very happy so far.

Deacon,

I'm a DML fan and think the Pershing was one of their best releases. I have three of them now. Also, I believe it was recently re-issued, so they are easier to get now.

Over the Tamiya kit, the thing I like best about the DML is the indy link tracks. I know some people like the rubber bands but, given the choice, I prefer the look of the links. I think they add a lot. Of course if you were planning on an aftermarket replacement for the tracks, it's a moot point.

As far as fit, as I mentioned the Pershing is one of DML's best so it goes together nice.

The Tamiya does have a 'working' suspension but I don't really 'play' with my models once finished so this isn't a concern for me. It may help when putting on an uneven dio base but if you are doing this reposing DML's suspension isn't a huge deal.

Hopefully, others will be able to point out some finer things. I know there are details that one kit has that the other dosen't.

Oh, and price might be another issue. Probably $10 less for the DML. Maybe more.

If you haven't already noticed, I like DML's Pershing a lot!

Steve

As Steve pointed out, there are a couple of factors in deciding. First is price, the Tamiya kit is a little more than the DML. Second is ease of construction. DML kits are generally very nice but can be a little fidgety. Tamiya's kits usually fall together. Then there are the tracks, DML has individual links, and Tamiya has vinyl tracks. Some folks swear by/avoid at all costs either type.

Your call.

I'd agree with what Rob and Steve said. The difference is 6 and 1/2 dozen. The both have good points and bad points.

DML: Indy track links, cheap, good detail
Tamiya: Slightly better detail than DML, falls together without any problems

You just have to chose what is more important to you. Good luck. This is one of the few subjects where the choice is tough. Most of the time there is one good kit and one or two really bad kits to choose from. In that case the choice is pretty simple.

HTH

I have to agree with Adam Rob and steve I have the Dml kit looks super nice. Have not seen the Tamiya kit opened yet I know it would be a good kit also. I guess a matter of taste or to save the extra $15.00 or so dollars I got my Dml for $25.00 and the Tamiya is around $40.00 so go from there.

Thanks guys! If the only real significant difference is in the running gear then I think I will stick with the DML. Can the M-26A1 Korean War version be back dated to represent the one used in WW II? I have one and was curious.

Thanks
Deacon

It could, but it would probably be easier to just buy a DML T-26E3, as they have recently been re-released. If I remember correctly, the gun barrel is different, the gun travel lock is wrong for a WWII Pershing, and the T80 double-pin tracks weren't used until after the war in Europe.

Like Bob says, a few minor fittings here and there, major thing is the tracks.