Hosted by Darren Baker
Is diecast metal chassis for 1/72 good/bad?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0051/e00514bdd30be1ed92f26cd427ca4df209d84600" alt=""
json
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d7c9/2d7c96b367a79b899705021b64b909ebe3334dde" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: December 04, 2004
KitMaker: 257 posts
Armorama: 156 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/982e8/982e8fb6685a048ad209882a951debaa173a4f66" alt="Captain"
Posted: Monday, January 03, 2005 - 09:38 PM UTC
I've been looking at some of the "older" Dragon 1/72 scale german tanks, and quite a few is with "metal diecast chassis". I have never liked working with metal parts much. How are the Dragon models to work with??
My first thought was to buy Revell or Italeri instead.
regards,
Steen
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2175/b217580b09f76a3aec81aa567acfa1e002a077b3" alt=""
SpiritsEye
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ae6e/4ae6e8b026a91ff3407bf7c1ecf12ff6914ffe84" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: May 09, 2004
KitMaker: 1,041 posts
Armorama: 533 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86341/863416df17a83c31acde8e5e4fa7adda6c3abad6" alt="First Sergeant"
Posted: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 - 12:30 AM UTC
heard from reviews that the DML 1:72 die-cast kits ...most of them have fit issues...and it is quite tedious to correct them
italeri 1:72 isnt that great...they are re-issued ESCI kits..which isnt too bad for their day...but i'd recommend Revell...IMHO, the best 1:72 maker out there!
italeri 1:72 isnt that great...they are re-issued ESCI kits..which isnt too bad for their day...but i'd recommend Revell...IMHO, the best 1:72 maker out there!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c882/3c882b32c7afc0e322e3d3f865d3e1e122b9cd01" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afc43/afc4389ea7a82ec5b1530cc787766a90e6b6f9c4" alt=""
mikeli125
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca1fc/ca1fc7d0ff84c4992d4c719626601eec01b9220c" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: December 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,595 posts
Armorama: 1,209 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2287c/2287c50350dc7385ad0755afa5f243d10fa7b0b2" alt="Lieutenant General"
Posted: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 - 12:34 AM UTC
I think on the newer releases there are no fit problems as for the die-cast issue at least it will give a bit of weight and stop the wheels"floating" on the tracks
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8f4/9d8f4118e067c2303a6c8fa14663ea0af13b1bb5" alt=""
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b71cb/b71cbabb1b3e0b1606cd88d26ba6e59221c1c6cf" alt=""
Posted: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 - 09:18 AM UTC
One of their latest releases, the AAV7A1 USMC AMTRAC, has a diecast upper and lower hull. The detail is molded on and soft because the hull has a thick coat of gray primer on it. It also leaves a nasty gap all the way around the circumference of the model. Since it is diecast, it is not as easy to deal with the gap as it would be if the kit was all plastic.
The Panther series has really tight tracks and since both the upper and lower hull are diecast, it is difficult to adjust the position of the sprocket or idler wheel to give the tracks some slack. Other problems arise with molded on detail and the fit of the upper and lower hull (metal must be filed to allow the two to mate).
Another diecast Dragon kit I've tackled is the Sturmtiger. This kit has just a diecast upper hull with a plastic lower hull. The diecast hull makes adding zimmerit difficult. I thought this one was the best looking of the diecast hulled kits I've built.
The Panther series has really tight tracks and since both the upper and lower hull are diecast, it is difficult to adjust the position of the sprocket or idler wheel to give the tracks some slack. Other problems arise with molded on detail and the fit of the upper and lower hull (metal must be filed to allow the two to mate).
Another diecast Dragon kit I've tackled is the Sturmtiger. This kit has just a diecast upper hull with a plastic lower hull. The diecast hull makes adding zimmerit difficult. I thought this one was the best looking of the diecast hulled kits I've built.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e53/77e534c8e5b1620264977bd18d8d050c5f3169ff" alt=""
Cvrle
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/05a3b/05a3b14d4cca5a8dca062adfaed0ee739f810b8c" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: October 08, 2004
KitMaker: 104 posts
Armorama: 32 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71e6d/71e6d91d823dbb40fa0bb5131e2ca56ed92604b2" alt="Lance Corporal"
Posted: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 - 10:22 AM UTC
I prefer the all-plastic kits, but nobody else does make the AAV7A1
Revell is a good place to start, especially their Challenger 1- simple and beautiful
I feel that die-cast metal is just too "thick" a medium for 72 (or for 48, but that's another gripe
)
Cheers,
Tvrtko
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99a89/99a89adf585b98b06870d9aed0300280f2091403" alt=""
Revell is a good place to start, especially their Challenger 1- simple and beautiful
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b063e/b063eb65de86eda1db874fed1b9a2e9435e19358" alt=""
I feel that die-cast metal is just too "thick" a medium for 72 (or for 48, but that's another gripe
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e6c6e/e6c6ec914ee345fe25ad4de1a23fc79e6857bab3" alt=""
Cheers,
Tvrtko
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/56bc5/56bc57ee67325677184c02bd3b6956e0c9b5d8c3" alt=""
hworth18
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: January 10, 2003
KitMaker: 426 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27ea0/27ea0c2ba93a8c267b5cf346f3fe3c5efa93b11e" alt="Major"
Posted: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 - 12:08 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I've been looking at some of the "older" Dragon 1/72 scale german tanks, and quite a few is with "metal diecast chassis". I have never liked working with metal parts much. How are the Dragon models to work with??
My first thought was to buy Revell or Italeri instead.
regards,
Steen
I have built a dozen or so Dragon 1/72 kits.. Once you figure out the fix, they are no big deal.. As far as the diecast hull goes, the metal just needs to be filed to fit the other hull.. Personally, I think the Dragon kits can't be beat for the price and details and accuracy to scale..
The Revell kits are very good, and are comparable to the Dragon stuff.. I'd stay away from the Italeri kits if I were you..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e4f32/e4f32647af2c3d2835a6b87394889573c2e78fe7" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0051/e00514bdd30be1ed92f26cd427ca4df209d84600" alt=""
json
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2d7c9/2d7c96b367a79b899705021b64b909ebe3334dde" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: December 04, 2004
KitMaker: 257 posts
Armorama: 156 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/982e8/982e8fb6685a048ad209882a951debaa173a4f66" alt="Captain"
Posted: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 - 09:51 PM UTC
Thanks for the input guys!
I can't completely stay away from Italeri, like in the "old days" with ESCI, they make some soft skins that can't be found anywhere else! Haven't been able to locate a 1/72 M8 anywhere else!?
Somewhere I saw a review of the Sturmtiger, but the parts on the pictures were clearly plastic, even the upper hull. Could this be an early kit, or even better, a late kit with plastic instead of metal !?
regards,
Steen
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1e2e7/1e2e78f81421c27f40f7ff5fa68486dd5d35169a" alt=""
Emeritus
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1779/c17798825d8de02cbc74f910b53fdf3f2204b3d6" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: March 30, 2004
KitMaker: 2,845 posts
Armorama: 808 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1444a/1444abaebce1fceb360babad791575370f96af0d" alt="Command Sergeant Major"
Posted: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 - 02:10 AM UTC
Yes, that might be the case. In some of the newer releases the chassis is moulded in styrene instead of metal. DML Porsche kingtiger has die-cast hull pieces while the newer Henschel-turreted one has a plastic hull. No problems with fit on that tiger. Plastic is always nice if a kit has moulded-on tools. I just omitted zimmerit and painted my tiger dark yellow. Let's say it's a prototype. Tracks fitted nicely, lenght is ideal, I got a nice sagging effect by just glueing the track on the roadwheels with epoxy and superglue. I'll post some pics when it's finished. I just have to do a little bit of weathering.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0051/e00514bdd30be1ed92f26cd427ca4df209d84600" alt=""
bbtoys
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: June 17, 2004
KitMaker: 93 posts
Armorama: 46 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6e8dd/6e8ddaecc4e9d19a11a0328a8828c4140ebf4495" alt="Teğmen"
Posted: Wednesday, January 05, 2005 - 11:44 AM UTC
Hi Steen,
We have the same avatar! Dragon may be reissuing some of the 1/72 kits with diecast hulls in styrene in the near future. They have shown themselves to be very response to modelers' demands and have come out with improved kits (see the pro version of the 1/72 Elefant) and so if you can wait a little, build the ones that are already out in plastic and wait for the others that now have diecast hulls to come out in styrene as re-issues.
Cheers,
Richard
We have the same avatar! Dragon may be reissuing some of the 1/72 kits with diecast hulls in styrene in the near future. They have shown themselves to be very response to modelers' demands and have come out with improved kits (see the pro version of the 1/72 Elefant) and so if you can wait a little, build the ones that are already out in plastic and wait for the others that now have diecast hulls to come out in styrene as re-issues.
Cheers,
Richard
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d4ef/6d4efe9864b7f368259050a0749d31ad12450ed4" alt=""
McBain
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85b38/85b38bd2d83875c0431be47f14da8e4aa8f0450b" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: May 22, 2004
KitMaker: 37 posts
Armorama: 35 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43acb/43acb88acd20be4f82985e1a6427e8e04b435311" alt="2nd Lieutenant"
Posted: Thursday, January 06, 2005 - 10:23 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Another diecast Dragon kit I've tackled is the Sturmtiger. This kit has just a diecast upper hull with a plastic lower hull. The diecast hull makes adding zimmerit difficult. I thought this one was the best looking of the diecast hulled kits I've built.
Atak make a resin zimmerit set for this kit that includes a complete upper hull replacement. The zimmerit is good and there is the added bonus that the horrible metal hull can be binned.
Personally I dislike the metal parts for all the reasons mentioned. Any possible benefit is completely outweighed by the drawbacks. It does seem that Dragon is (thankfully!) phasing them out.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8f4/9d8f4118e067c2303a6c8fa14663ea0af13b1bb5" alt=""
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b71cb/b71cbabb1b3e0b1606cd88d26ba6e59221c1c6cf" alt=""
Posted: Thursday, January 06, 2005 - 11:18 AM UTC
I'm aware of the Atak set, but it seems such a shame that a major part of the kit needs to be replaced in order to build an accurate rendering of the Sturmtiger (and at a price that is more than the kit itself!).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d4ef/6d4efe9864b7f368259050a0749d31ad12450ed4" alt=""
McBain
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85b38/85b38bd2d83875c0431be47f14da8e4aa8f0450b" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: May 22, 2004
KitMaker: 37 posts
Armorama: 35 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43acb/43acb88acd20be4f82985e1a6427e8e04b435311" alt="2nd Lieutenant"
Posted: Friday, January 07, 2005 - 05:40 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I'm aware of the Atak set, but it seems such a shame that a major part of the kit needs to be replaced in order to build an accurate rendering of the Sturmtiger (and at a price that is more than the kit itself!).
Yes, maybe Dragon will replace the upper hull with a plastic version, as has apparently been done with some of the other kits.
Still, I think the Atak set is worth the money as the zimmerit is very well done and it allows for improvements to be made much more easily(removing moulded on tools for example).
The other option of course is to scratchbuild!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ba46/9ba468cef9feca313c50fa9a7a07343a547225a5" alt=""
Spades
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: February 08, 2003
KitMaker: 776 posts
Armorama: 477 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb8f6/fb8f6a0eeb771b5d668299c4f1e020de125a341a" alt="Lt. Colonel"
Posted: Friday, January 07, 2005 - 02:57 PM UTC
Depends, some people like them and others dont. I dont really care for them all that much. But, what I DO like is the nice weight it gives off once completely done.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3085c/3085c51915fc77be3af45085f97c5693169a0d71" alt=""
Biggles2
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04ecd/04ecd0e44a20f77949c9a367aa345a751737734b" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/006e7/006e7334cbcd3e4f0edbd8db559aecb90b004811" alt="Field Marshal"
Posted: Thursday, January 27, 2005 - 03:54 PM UTC
I would stay away from Dragon's die-cast hulls as the detail is just not as sharp as on plastic. If weight is an issue, you can buy model RR lead weights and glue them inside the hull. Some varieties of weights are sectional, like Caramilk bars, and can be broken into appropriate lengths and weights.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c882/3c882b32c7afc0e322e3d3f865d3e1e122b9cd01" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a57cd/a57cd6c7f835b77c5af4407054c0b9780628a184" alt=""
Hoovie
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0b845/0b84536d954e4c8ec6aefa04ff39c3b093fedd05" alt="Visit this Community"
Joined: March 14, 2004
KitMaker: 505 posts
Armorama: 217 posts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba086/ba08600c00ed7deb0ab87318782b774936050000" alt="Chief Petty Officer"
Posted: Saturday, January 29, 2005 - 04:22 PM UTC
Hell DML makes 1/72 tanks allready done
and nice and cheap!
$14
HTH~
Ron
and nice and cheap!
$14
HTH~
Ron
![]() |