_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Axis - WWII
Armor and ground forces of the Axis forces during World War II.
Hosted by Darren Baker
Finally finished my StuG IV
avukich
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: April 11, 2002
KitMaker: 760 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, September 09, 2002 - 11:09 PM UTC


Finally, after 4 months of working on it, I finished my super-detailed StuG IV. The model consists of the Tamiya StuG IV with plenty of AM stuff and scratch-building.

I used:

Eduard PE Detail set
Eduard PE StuG IV Schurzen set
Modelkasten tracks
Modelkasten Pz. IV roadwheels
Tamiya Pz. IV OVE set
Moskit exhaust
Minimeca antennas
Friulmodel drive sprockets
Jordi Rubio barrel
Archer Dry Transfers

The zimmerit was done with a combination of Cavalier Generic ridged-pattern zimmerit and Tamiya Putty and Tamiya zimmerit rakes. Most of the zimmerit was done with putty, but the few really large sections were done with Cavalier zimmerit. The spare track rack was scratch-built. I painted it with Tamiya, Polly S, and Humbrol paints. I did a wash with Turpenoid and Windsor & Newton oils and did extensive dry-brushing. I also used plenty of pastel chalks and a pencil (for the tools and the worn metal of the drive sprockets and guide horns).

I think that I will do a few models mostly OOB to take a break from the super-detailing, but it was fun trying to put some lipstick on a pig instead of going the easy route and building the DML StuG IV.

There are more pictures on-line if you click on the "Adam's Attic" link below.
slodder
Visit this Community
North Carolina, United States
Joined: February 22, 2002
KitMaker: 11,718 posts
Armorama: 7,138 posts
Posted: Monday, September 09, 2002 - 11:17 PM UTC
Very nice work. The time was well spent. I like the tracks.

Folgore
Visit this Community
Canada
Joined: May 31, 2002
KitMaker: 1,109 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, September 09, 2002 - 11:23 PM UTC
Really well done. I love the mud. How were the Moskit exhausts? I've heard of them, but wasn't sure if they'd be worth it. What's your take on them?

Nic
avukich
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: April 11, 2002
KitMaker: 760 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, September 09, 2002 - 11:29 PM UTC
Thanks for your compliments guys. The Moskit exhausts are really nice. They are one improvement that I will always make it the exhaust is available because it is an easy improvement and it makes a dramatic difference. They are definately true to scale and are textured beautifully. Here is a picture that shows the exhaust:

The texture was already there with the Moskit exhaust even down to the weld line that you can see running the length of the exhaust. Moskit exhausts are simply beautiful and well worth it in my opinion.
Folgore
Visit this Community
Canada
Joined: May 31, 2002
KitMaker: 1,109 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, September 09, 2002 - 11:37 PM UTC
Adam--Is it possible to dent the exhausts a little, or are they too thick for that? They sure look nice.

Nic
Maki
Staff MemberSenior Editor
ARMORAMA
Visit this Community
Croatia Hrvatska
Joined: February 13, 2002
KitMaker: 5,579 posts
Armorama: 2,988 posts
Posted: Monday, September 09, 2002 - 11:37 PM UTC
Great work, buddy.. Now don't be shy and tell us all how you did on the Washington Armor Show 2002...

Great, just great.
Mario M.
avukich
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: April 11, 2002
KitMaker: 760 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, September 09, 2002 - 11:47 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Adam--Is it possible to dent the exhausts a little, or are they too thick for that? They sure look nice.



I've never tried, but they are thin enough that it shouldn't be a problem at all to dent them it that is what you want to do. Maybe I will try to do that with my next model that uses a Moskit exhaust.


Quoted Text

Now don't be shy and tell us all how you did on the Washington Armor Show 2002...



I won a gold in the Axis WWII category, but truthfully I was very surprised because I don't think that I deserved that. I anticipated a silver or bronze maybe, but certainly not gold.
KFMagee
Visit this Community
Texas, United States
Joined: January 08, 2002
KitMaker: 1,586 posts
Armorama: 1,225 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 - 12:51 AM UTC
Kudos... nice set. I'm about to start the same model... any tips or traps I might consider ahead of time?
GunTruck
Visit this Community
California, United States
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 5,885 posts
Armorama: 3,799 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 - 01:36 AM UTC
NIce StuG IV Adam - share some more pics - I'm beginning to feel inspired!!!

Gunnie
avukich
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: April 11, 2002
KitMaker: 760 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 - 02:07 AM UTC

Quoted Text

I'm about to start the same model... any tips or traps I might consider ahead of time?



I went a little overboard with the super-detailing, but the things that I would consider essentials are:

- Zimmerit is needed because the version of the vehicle that the Tamiya kit depicts (early) was built during the zimmerit months. They started making the late version StuG IV just before zimmerit usage was stopped in September 1944.
- The tracks are terrible and should be replaced with suitable DML, Modelkasten, or Friulmodel tracks.
- The wheels are the old Tamiya type with no detail on the back (that is why I replaced them with the Modelkasten ones).
- The kit doesn't include the spare track rack seen in the picture of the right hand side above although every photo I've ever encountered of a StuG IV shows this rack.
- The kit includes a tool box that is to be mounted on the rear deck, but I never came across a picture of a StuG IV with this box.
- The antenna mounts are terrible and should be replaced with the ones in the Tamiya Panzer IV OVE set. Unfortunately, the OVE set only comes with one antenna mount so I had to buy two sets because all StuG IVs mounted 2 antennas.
- The tools are pretty bad and should be replaced with the Tamiya Panzer IV OVE set ones.
- If you do PE, Eduard makes a set specifically for this vehicle and it is very nice.
- The kit contains all of the motorization holes that will need filled and there are holes under the sponsoons that also need filled.
- The machine gun shield is grossly oversized. I replaced mine with one that was built in the Eduard PE set.
- The schurzen and schurzen mounts are grossly oversized also. I replaced the mounts with the Eduard StuG IV Schurzen set. The reason that I didn't use the schurzen themselves is that my model is depicting a StuG IV of the 17th SS P.G.D. in Normandy and all known photos of that unit's StuG IVs show them sans schurzen. Most likely this is because they were either ripped off by the hedges or they were removed so that they would not be ripped off by the hedges and damage the mounts.

HTH
SS-74
Visit this Community
Vatican City
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 - 11:37 AM UTC
A Big Congratulations to you Sir Avukich! You really nail this old dog!
Kencelot
Visit this Community
Florida, United States
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 - 05:24 PM UTC
Very nice job Avukich! I really like the those Modelkasten tracks, and the paint job you gave her. Where's the side skirts?
sgtreef
Visit this Community
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: March 01, 2002
KitMaker: 6,043 posts
Armorama: 4,347 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 - 06:23 PM UTC
Sorry for chiming in late but great job Adam. And I see what you mean about the exhaust looks good. Applying Zimmerit wow I don't know if I would trust my self with that. So an article is do hey . Again great job (:-)

Were those modelkasten a pain to use? They look good with the hollowed out guide horns
avukich
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: April 11, 2002
KitMaker: 760 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 - 07:46 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Where's the side skirts?



The reason that I didn't use the schurzen themselves is that my model is depicting a StuG IV of the 17th SS P.G.D. in Normandy and all known photos of that unit's StuG IVs show them sans schurzen. Most likely this is because they were either ripped off by the hedges or they were removed so that they would not be ripped off by the hedges and damage the mounts.

Thanks everyone for your compliments!
avukich
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: April 11, 2002
KitMaker: 760 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 - 07:52 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Were those modelkasten a pain to use? They look good with the hollowed out guide horns



This was the first time that I used MK tracks and I must say that they were a lot easier to use than expected. The big time saver that I used was to clean all of the track links first while watching TV and then when putting the thing together I left a large piece of sprue on the guide horns and attached them to the links with ZAP fast acting super glue. After about 10 minutes I would go back and snip off the left over sprues on the guide horns and then hit the attachment point with an emory board. I found this much faster an easier than cleaning all of the guide horns before attaching them. That was much more tedious because it was hard to hold on to them, but by attaching them the are not hard to hold onto.
 _GOTOTOP