David (lestweforget) suggested that I could try to use photoshop to put photos of my model on real photo background.
Here are two example results:
I'm sure someone could do it better, I'm not that good in using photoshop.
Here are photos of my model, for those who have not seen the thread in Campaign Central Command: https://armorama.kitmaker.net/forums/45318&page=1
Pawel
Hosted by Darren Baker
M113A3 model on photo background
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 10, 2005 - 10:35 PM UTC
lestweforget
Victoria, Australia
Joined: November 08, 2002
KitMaker: 2,832 posts
Armorama: 1,500 posts
Joined: November 08, 2002
KitMaker: 2,832 posts
Armorama: 1,500 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 10, 2005 - 11:27 PM UTC
Well well, thats excellent!
the first one i must say looks more real, with the second one, the M113 still looks real, but looks as though it has been photoshopped on, as in u can tell it is another photo, but, i think if you blurred it up a bit more and maybe made the M113 pic look darker, then itd be spot on.
Thanks for that though mate, very very cool!
cheers
the first one i must say looks more real, with the second one, the M113 still looks real, but looks as though it has been photoshopped on, as in u can tell it is another photo, but, i think if you blurred it up a bit more and maybe made the M113 pic look darker, then itd be spot on.
Thanks for that though mate, very very cool!
cheers
straightedge
Ohio, United States
Joined: January 18, 2004
KitMaker: 1,352 posts
Armorama: 629 posts
Joined: January 18, 2004
KitMaker: 1,352 posts
Armorama: 629 posts
Posted: Thursday, February 10, 2005 - 11:51 PM UTC
I agree with David on this completely Pawel, that first one looks as real as can be, but that second one, well lets just forget about that one, and start over. The only thing missing on the second one, is tape.
Kerry
Kerry
Epi
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Posted: Friday, February 11, 2005 - 12:24 AM UTC
Pawel,
Yup, the first one does look more realistic, but! There is always a but!!!!
A couple of things for that picture, and you might know this already. It woudnt be a realistic picture. Now I might be wrong on this, but its based on my experience when we loaded and unloaded the ships.
1. tracks and vehicles won't have there weapons mounted, ie the .50 Cal.
2. You painted your vehicle to simulate the dust of Iraq, but all vehicles going on or coming off the ships where to be washed or washed when they go on.
Other than that, good job on the pictures and DAMN GOOD JOB ON THE TRACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Yup, the first one does look more realistic, but! There is always a but!!!!
A couple of things for that picture, and you might know this already. It woudnt be a realistic picture. Now I might be wrong on this, but its based on my experience when we loaded and unloaded the ships.
1. tracks and vehicles won't have there weapons mounted, ie the .50 Cal.
2. You painted your vehicle to simulate the dust of Iraq, but all vehicles going on or coming off the ships where to be washed or washed when they go on.
Other than that, good job on the pictures and DAMN GOOD JOB ON THE TRACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Friday, February 11, 2005 - 12:43 AM UTC
Oh, well... Thanks for comments. It looks like I should stick to building models and not play with photoshop... :-)
Pawel
Pawel
gcdavidson
Ontario, Canada
Joined: August 05, 2003
KitMaker: 1,698 posts
Armorama: 1,563 posts
Joined: August 05, 2003
KitMaker: 1,698 posts
Armorama: 1,563 posts
Posted: Friday, February 11, 2005 - 01:57 AM UTC
The first one had me fooled until I realized there was no driver in the hatch! good job!!
Trackjam
Ontario, Canada
Joined: April 12, 2002
KitMaker: 831 posts
Armorama: 614 posts
Joined: April 12, 2002
KitMaker: 831 posts
Armorama: 614 posts
Posted: Friday, February 11, 2005 - 04:00 AM UTC
I think you need to a bit more work on the M1A1 model in the second photo. (lol)
rv1963
New York, United States
Joined: December 07, 2004
KitMaker: 1,888 posts
Armorama: 315 posts
Joined: December 07, 2004
KitMaker: 1,888 posts
Armorama: 315 posts
Posted: Friday, February 11, 2005 - 04:10 AM UTC
Don't stop using Photoshop i have been using photoshop for over 8 years you did nice job on those pictures, the first one is better, keep using it you will get better.
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Friday, February 11, 2005 - 04:10 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I think you need to a bit more work on the M1A1 model in the second photo. (lol)
Yeah, You're right - it looks very artificial next to my M113 :-) :-) :-)
Pawel
SEDimmick
New Jersey, United States
Joined: March 15, 2002
KitMaker: 1,745 posts
Armorama: 1,483 posts
Joined: March 15, 2002
KitMaker: 1,745 posts
Armorama: 1,483 posts
Posted: Friday, February 11, 2005 - 04:24 AM UTC
I think the problem with the second photo is that the photo of the M113 is in a much higher resoultion then the background its on.
USArmy2534
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,716 posts
Armorama: 1,864 posts
Joined: January 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,716 posts
Armorama: 1,864 posts
Posted: Friday, February 11, 2005 - 04:34 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextI think you need to a bit more work on the M1A1 model in the second photo. (lol)
Yeah, You're right - it looks very artificial next to my M113 :-) :-) :-)
Pawel
That is what is needed. There is nothing wrong with the M113 in the second picture. It is everything else what is wrong. Lighten up the M1A1 and the background.
As for the first picture, I did not even notice the weapons imperfection. I thought I was looking at a picture from the Navy's photofiles. Chalk it up to a lapse in protocol (God forbid)
Jeff
matt
Campaigns Administrator
New York, United States
Joined: February 28, 2002
KitMaker: 5,957 posts
Armorama: 2,956 posts
Joined: February 28, 2002
KitMaker: 5,957 posts
Armorama: 2,956 posts
Posted: Friday, February 11, 2005 - 04:47 AM UTC
Hey........ They're offloading ina Unfriendly port!!!!! hehehehehe