Hi All,
Is it because of different suspension that the As90 doesn't need the spade grips at the rear like the Paladin?
Tom
Hosted by Darren Baker
M109/AS90
allycat
England - North East, United Kingdom
Joined: October 03, 2004
KitMaker: 942 posts
Armorama: 571 posts
Joined: October 03, 2004
KitMaker: 942 posts
Armorama: 571 posts
Posted: Monday, March 07, 2005 - 04:29 AM UTC
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Monday, March 07, 2005 - 04:35 AM UTC
Paladin doesn't use them in normal firing configuration. Paladin has the same heavy duty brakes and transmission lockout system as AS-90. The spades on the M109A6 Paladin are a hold-over from the earlier M109-M109A5 series, they are only used as an additional safety measure when mated (back to back) to the M992A2 Ammo Carrier, which is not a standard way to employ them. Usually, the Paladin operates in concert with another Paladin (a Paladin pair) and the ammo carriers stay to the flanks to provide security, only coming forward to resupply the Paladin when needed. Even then they don't back up to the gun, normally pulling up sideways behind them to transfer rounds/propellants/primers, etc.
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Monday, March 07, 2005 - 07:48 AM UTC
And here is proof that what Gino wrote is true:
Pawel
Pawel
Snowhand
Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: January 08, 2005
KitMaker: 1,066 posts
Armorama: 345 posts
Joined: January 08, 2005
KitMaker: 1,066 posts
Armorama: 345 posts
Posted: Monday, March 07, 2005 - 07:54 AM UTC
Even on the M109A2 we didn't use the spades ever...
So none of use had any idea as to why they were there at all..
All they did is annoy us by gathering a lot of dust everytime.
BTW, that was the Dutch army, 1994/ 5 era
Oh, and Pawel: nice picture, but... way tooooooo much flash... when we fired our M109's... there was a lot of smoke but allmost no flash to speak off....
ANd for the sake of the crew of that paladin, i hope those jerrycans contain water lol ( which would by pasteurised after a few shots )
So none of use had any idea as to why they were there at all..
All they did is annoy us by gathering a lot of dust everytime.
BTW, that was the Dutch army, 1994/ 5 era
Oh, and Pawel: nice picture, but... way tooooooo much flash... when we fired our M109's... there was a lot of smoke but allmost no flash to speak off....
ANd for the sake of the crew of that paladin, i hope those jerrycans contain water lol ( which would by pasteurised after a few shots )
18Bravo
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Joined: January 20, 2005
KitMaker: 7,219 posts
Armorama: 6,097 posts
Posted: Monday, March 07, 2005 - 08:47 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Oh, and Pawel: nice picture, but... way tooooooo much flash... when we fired our M109's... there was a lot of smoke but allmost no flash to speak off....
Back in my 13 Bravo days, we'd pour motor oil in the tubes for a great photo op.
peacekeeper
Florida, United States
Joined: May 07, 2004
KitMaker: 715 posts
Armorama: 297 posts
Joined: May 07, 2004
KitMaker: 715 posts
Armorama: 297 posts
Posted: Monday, March 07, 2005 - 09:21 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Back in my 13 Bravo days, we'd pour motor oil in the tubes for a great photo op.
We used to do that with the 106 recoilless when doing firepower demonstrations. The gasps from the peanut gallery when a 20 ft. flame came out of 6 tubes all firing in unison was hilarious.
RoelGeutjens
Belgium
Joined: March 17, 2005
KitMaker: 410 posts
Armorama: 383 posts
Joined: March 17, 2005
KitMaker: 410 posts
Armorama: 383 posts
Posted: Monday, March 21, 2005 - 04:53 AM UTC
I have been in service with the artillery on an M109A2. We didn't have the brakes like the paladin but we needed those spades and even with them lowered the vehicle would be back about 1 meter after firing several shots.....
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Monday, March 21, 2005 - 05:28 AM UTC
Yup, we always used the spades through the A5 version. Standard policy in US Army, actually lowering and setting them was part of the crew drill for occupation.
Burik
New Jersey, United States
Joined: March 12, 2002
KitMaker: 1,437 posts
Armorama: 1,303 posts
Joined: March 12, 2002
KitMaker: 1,437 posts
Armorama: 1,303 posts
Posted: Monday, March 21, 2005 - 02:07 PM UTC
I have a rear close-up shot of a Paladin firing during OIF1 if anybody is interested. But, the gallery is down right now and I can not post it. Oh well. The spade is not down as others have discussed.
I don't think these guys poured anything down the gun tube of this Paladin. :-)
Bob
I don't think these guys poured anything down the gun tube of this Paladin. :-)
Bob
TacFireGuru
Colorado, United States
Joined: December 25, 2004
KitMaker: 3,770 posts
Armorama: 2,263 posts
Joined: December 25, 2004
KitMaker: 3,770 posts
Armorama: 2,263 posts
Posted: Monday, March 21, 2005 - 03:00 PM UTC
18Bravo, tell me you didn't pour oil down the tube!!! Tell me!!!! Oh, and tell me you didn't put a double edge razor blades between the fuze and the round! Tell me!!1
Man, I love that sound!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-) :-) :-) :-)
Man, I love that sound!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :-) :-) :-) :-)