Hi gang. Here is Dragon's T-34/85 tank I am working on. Notice where I snapped the hull machinegun off. I'm a clumsy sod for sure!
What I need to know is if the panzerfaust hole on the turret is accurate to scale?
Any comments/ helpful hints are appreciated.
Constructive Feedback
For in-progress or completed build photos. Give and get contructive feedback!
For in-progress or completed build photos. Give and get contructive feedback!
Hosted by Darren Baker, Dave O'Meara
My in preogress T-34/85 & Panzerfaust damage
Tapper
Alabama, United States
Joined: July 26, 2003
KitMaker: 664 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Joined: July 26, 2003
KitMaker: 664 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 - 01:31 PM UTC
Joker111
Oregon, United States
Joined: January 22, 2005
KitMaker: 53 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: January 22, 2005
KitMaker: 53 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 - 04:19 PM UTC
To me it looks great Tapper! Nice weathering/dusting.
And the Panzerfaust hit looks cool and on scale as far as I know...The later models were big ass bombs man! I think they could easily do that sort of damage.
But, I never tried it myself..
Cool build! Good picture quality too!
Frans
And the Panzerfaust hit looks cool and on scale as far as I know...The later models were big ass bombs man! I think they could easily do that sort of damage.
But, I never tried it myself..
Cool build! Good picture quality too!
Frans
MCR
Arizona, United States
Joined: July 15, 2004
KitMaker: 464 posts
Armorama: 407 posts
Joined: July 15, 2004
KitMaker: 464 posts
Armorama: 407 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 - 05:31 PM UTC
Hey Paul,
If memory serves even the larger warhead of the later Panzerfausts made a fairly small hole. Something on the order of an inch to an inch and a half (25 to 35mm). I know there's data on this out there, let me check and see if I can find a real number for you.
Also, given the size of these warheads I think you could expect to see more damage to things like the paint and the thinner sheet metal of the saw, horn, headlamp, and tool box.
Mark
If memory serves even the larger warhead of the later Panzerfausts made a fairly small hole. Something on the order of an inch to an inch and a half (25 to 35mm). I know there's data on this out there, let me check and see if I can find a real number for you.
Also, given the size of these warheads I think you could expect to see more damage to things like the paint and the thinner sheet metal of the saw, horn, headlamp, and tool box.
Mark
sgirty
Ohio, United States
Joined: February 12, 2003
KitMaker: 1,315 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: February 12, 2003
KitMaker: 1,315 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 - 12:22 AM UTC
Hi,
Great job. I really like the weathering effects on your model. Looks real. I like all the little wear points you added in high traffic areas. Not over done. And the hit looks in good scale. Great job so far.
Take care, Sgirty
Great job. I really like the weathering effects on your model. Looks real. I like all the little wear points you added in high traffic areas. Not over done. And the hit looks in good scale. Great job so far.
Take care, Sgirty
Tapper
Alabama, United States
Joined: July 26, 2003
KitMaker: 664 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Joined: July 26, 2003
KitMaker: 664 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 - 05:09 AM UTC
Thanks guys!
I was afraid I made the hole too big. I had no idea a panzerfaust made such a small hole, considering how much the Allies dreaded that weapon.
I'll have to upgrade to a 75mm or maybe an 88mm.
Thanks again!
Cheers!
I was afraid I made the hole too big. I had no idea a panzerfaust made such a small hole, considering how much the Allies dreaded that weapon.
I'll have to upgrade to a 75mm or maybe an 88mm.
Thanks again!
Cheers!
RockinChaz
Michigan, United States
Joined: July 28, 2004
KitMaker: 10 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: July 28, 2004
KitMaker: 10 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 - 10:51 AM UTC
The panzerfaust had a charge that penetreated the armor just enough to send its hot shrapnel and explosives inside of the tank, that is what made it so dangerous. That is also why you would see allied tanks with cages on some parts, the cages would make the charge detonate simply raining shrapnel off of the armor, causing no damage
oh and by the way, I really like your model, the weathering is really good.
oh and by the way, I really like your model, the weathering is really good.
3442
Quebec, Canada
Joined: March 23, 2004
KitMaker: 2,412 posts
Armorama: 1,174 posts
Joined: March 23, 2004
KitMaker: 2,412 posts
Armorama: 1,174 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 - 11:31 AM UTC
the weathering is great, iam suprised panerfaust knocked little holes, i thought they made biggers ones... always good to know
Frank
Frank
TsunamiBomb
Arizona, United States
Joined: September 21, 2004
KitMaker: 1,447 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: September 21, 2004
KitMaker: 1,447 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 - 12:17 PM UTC
I watched a show on the discovery channel on Arnhem a few months ago. They actually shot a panzerfaust at a tank. I cant remember how big the hole was specifically, but I remember being surprised on how small it was. I think MCR is correct on all of his data. BTW great build!
Posted: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 - 12:58 PM UTC
A hollow charge round ( such as the panzerfaust, bazooka, PIAT ) explodes on impact, and sends a blast or jet of hot gas forward. This basicaly melts the armour in front of it, thereby 'pushing' a stream of molten metal into the confinded space of the tank. As you can imagine this will devastate the inside of a small space as is a tank. The difference with a kinetic round (such as a SABOT) is that a SABOT uses its speed (momentum) to slam into/through the armour, thereby breaking the structure of the armour and sending shards (splinters)of metal around the confines of the vehicle.
Hence a hollow charge will create/leave a small, relativly smooth hole, whereas the kinetic round might not actualy penetrate but still kills the crew. This is also the reason why hollow charge rounds are effective from a short distance, and kinetic ones are not.
Hence the reason why Panzerfaust where so feared by the Allied crews in the later stages of the war.
Cheers
Henk
Ohh, and before I forget, the finish of your Tank is exemplary, that texture has been brought out perfectly.
Henk
Hence a hollow charge will create/leave a small, relativly smooth hole, whereas the kinetic round might not actualy penetrate but still kills the crew. This is also the reason why hollow charge rounds are effective from a short distance, and kinetic ones are not.
Hence the reason why Panzerfaust where so feared by the Allied crews in the later stages of the war.
Cheers
Henk
Ohh, and before I forget, the finish of your Tank is exemplary, that texture has been brought out perfectly.
Henk
SonOfAVet
Illinois, United States
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 547 posts
Armorama: 115 posts
Joined: January 18, 2003
KitMaker: 547 posts
Armorama: 115 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 10, 2005 - 10:46 AM UTC
How did you paint your T-34? Did you preshade, etc? I am curious because the finish is very convincing.
Sean
Sean
INDIA11A
Ontario, Canada
Joined: January 09, 2005
KitMaker: 577 posts
Armorama: 446 posts
Joined: January 09, 2005
KitMaker: 577 posts
Armorama: 446 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 10, 2005 - 02:02 PM UTC
As an EX-Anti-Armour gunner (106 RCL) and holes created by a heat type warhead is quite small (M72 = quarter size). Any type of penetrating hit, be it an AP or HEAT round will product large amounts of heat (pull a nail out of a 2X4 and touch it- friction) so the area around the penetration will be discoloured and will have "spalling" (whichyou did a very nice job of) around it (fancy name for the metal that is displaced that does not go into the veh). A burnt/silver metal for a recent hit or orangy rust colour for an older hit with the actual hole blackened should do the trick.
Martinnnn
Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: April 26, 2004
KitMaker: 5,435 posts
Armorama: 2,762 posts
Joined: April 26, 2004
KitMaker: 5,435 posts
Armorama: 2,762 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 12, 2005 - 05:06 AM UTC
Very cool, looks very convincing to me!
You've got an overall photo of your tank too?
Martin
You've got an overall photo of your tank too?
Martin
Tapper
Alabama, United States
Joined: July 26, 2003
KitMaker: 664 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Joined: July 26, 2003
KitMaker: 664 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 20, 2005 - 05:31 AM UTC
Sean, no pre or post shading at all. I painted it with a mixture of Delta Ceramcoat Dark Foliage Green and Seminole Green. I then gave it a wash in black oil and let to dry. When that was done I drybrushed the entire model with a lighter shade of the two greens to bring out the surface. It was then sealed and given a wash of raw umber.
Martinn, I'll post some more pics tonight.
Martinn, I'll post some more pics tonight.
Tapper
Alabama, United States
Joined: July 26, 2003
KitMaker: 664 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Joined: July 26, 2003
KitMaker: 664 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 20, 2005 - 09:10 AM UTC
Here you go Martinn! When I applied my final coat of flat varnish, it COMPLETELY destroyed all the weathering I had done. So I had to do it ALL over again from scratch!
Sumpfhund
California, United States
Joined: March 19, 2005
KitMaker: 39 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: March 19, 2005
KitMaker: 39 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 - 02:53 PM UTC
Wow. That is simply superb. Makes me want to go out and grab some soviet WWII armor. Good job.
Ryan
Ryan
Sensei
Belgrade, Serbia & Montenegro
Joined: October 25, 2003
KitMaker: 1,217 posts
Armorama: 799 posts
Joined: October 25, 2003
KitMaker: 1,217 posts
Armorama: 799 posts
Posted: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 - 08:19 PM UTC
excellent work man
i wont discuss the damage enough said by now.
but i will suggest one thing with your hull MG,
REPLACE IT, it ruins a perfectly done model, what you can do is use a medical needle to replace the MG, cut a piece, drill a hole and glue it.
Here is an example
cheers
i wont discuss the damage enough said by now.
but i will suggest one thing with your hull MG,
REPLACE IT, it ruins a perfectly done model, what you can do is use a medical needle to replace the MG, cut a piece, drill a hole and glue it.
Here is an example
cheers
Tapper
Alabama, United States
Joined: July 26, 2003
KitMaker: 664 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Joined: July 26, 2003
KitMaker: 664 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Posted: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 - 05:50 AM UTC
Sensei, thats a GREAT idea! I'll give it a try.
Martinnnn
Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: April 26, 2004
KitMaker: 5,435 posts
Armorama: 2,762 posts
Joined: April 26, 2004
KitMaker: 5,435 posts
Armorama: 2,762 posts
Posted: Saturday, March 26, 2005 - 11:00 AM UTC
Great work Paul, thanks for the pics
I'm sure you have diorama ideas for this tank....or am I wrong here? .........................
I'm sure you have diorama ideas for this tank....or am I wrong here? .........................
Tapper
Alabama, United States
Joined: July 26, 2003
KitMaker: 664 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Joined: July 26, 2003
KitMaker: 664 posts
Armorama: 484 posts
Posted: Sunday, March 27, 2005 - 04:46 AM UTC
Martinnn, I have some diorama ideas in my head but I just cant get the entire picture put together. I'd like to find some taller grass and start from there, perhaps blend a field scene with the suburbs of a German city. So many idea for what to use to make grass that I'm kind of overwhelmed!