"To chip or not to chip". That is the question.
Whether its right or wrong, I wont go into that.
When I look at this vehicle I see a nice camo job, but it all looks very flat. None of the actual vehicle details stand out. The only thing that stands out is the actual chips. There appears to be too much contrast between the flat camo and the stark chips and this adds to Jims point. If the bright camo is toned down due to weathering, one would imagine most of the chips would be toned down also .. apart from any new ones.
Eventhough, drybrushing and washes are not as "trendy" as they used to be, they provided a great effect in highlighting detail.
Maybe when all the other items are painted up, it will calm down the chipping contrast.
Using this information to be constructive, I believe you need to add depth, to details like the visor plates and panel lines. Chipping is a good tool to add to the defination effect, but relying on chipping alone to define detail, and being as stark as it is here, may give the wrong impression. Thats how it appears to me from this photograph.
Its also possible that if a metallic paint was used in the chip colour, it could appear brighter or be reflected in the photograph. Your call!