I hope so.
Thanks for the advice,
Andrew
Hosted by Darren Baker
TriStar Panzer 1 A
Oberst
Ontario, Canada
Joined: June 26, 2002
KitMaker: 851 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: June 26, 2002
KitMaker: 851 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 - 07:56 AM UTC
SS-74
Vatican City
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Joined: May 13, 2002
KitMaker: 3,271 posts
Armorama: 2,388 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 - 03:11 PM UTC
I had already finish building the panzer I A (minus the tracks, of course). As Adam said the only PE I had used was left over tool holders, and the only thing I can think of to make this little kit even better will be one nice antenna, and if you can find maybe two barrel for the machine gun.
Linz
Australia
Joined: March 18, 2002
KitMaker: 181 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: March 18, 2002
KitMaker: 181 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 - 03:51 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Is there much difference in the two tanks? I have read that the rear is modified, how will this effect the PE?
The Ausf B differed in suspension and powerplant. The A was fitted with a 57hp Krupp engine and this proved to be inadaquate, so a 100hp Maybach was installed in the B. Due to this and also the addition of another road wheel, the B had a different engine deck. The superstructre and the turret remained the same.
Ausf A (above) and B (below). Note the additional road wheel
Side view of a Panzerjager I. This used the same chassis as the Ausf B, so the extra road wheel is in better view here.
Cheers,
Linz
Oberst
Ontario, Canada
Joined: June 26, 2002
KitMaker: 851 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: June 26, 2002
KitMaker: 851 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 24, 2002 - 02:03 AM UTC
Thanks for the pics,
Andrew
Andrew