Revell put up pics of its nashorn on their site.
here's the link:
http://www.revell.de/typo3/en/products/model_kits/sd_motor_vehicle_164_nashorn/index.html?&L=1
Cheers,
Tvrtko
Hosted by Darren Baker
Revell put up pics of its Nashorn
Cvrle
Croatia Hrvatska
Joined: October 08, 2004
KitMaker: 104 posts
Armorama: 32 posts
Joined: October 08, 2004
KitMaker: 104 posts
Armorama: 32 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 - 07:30 AM UTC
Posted: Wednesday, August 10, 2005 - 07:35 AM UTC
rjray
California, United States
Joined: December 16, 2003
KitMaker: 230 posts
Armorama: 149 posts
Joined: December 16, 2003
KitMaker: 230 posts
Armorama: 149 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 11, 2005 - 08:02 PM UTC
Wonder how it'll stack up next to the Dragon one. At least Revell's track is usable...
95bravo
Kansas, United States
Joined: November 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,242 posts
Armorama: 504 posts
Joined: November 18, 2003
KitMaker: 2,242 posts
Armorama: 504 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 11, 2005 - 08:35 PM UTC
I thought it looked okay. Anyone fill out the dream-model survey?
I requested an M-103 Heavy Tank
I requested an M-103 Heavy Tank
HILBERT
Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
Joined: August 07, 2004
KitMaker: 4,808 posts
Armorama: 1,069 posts
Joined: August 07, 2004
KitMaker: 4,808 posts
Armorama: 1,069 posts
Posted: Thursday, August 11, 2005 - 10:15 PM UTC
I hope this is as good as dragon.
But I think this is a rebox from dragon's one.
So it would be better..... or crap...
I saw also this kit is less detailled then the dragon version.
But I think this is a rebox from dragon's one.
So it would be better..... or crap...
I saw also this kit is less detailled then the dragon version.
MLD
Vermont, United States
Joined: July 21, 2002
KitMaker: 3,569 posts
Armorama: 2,070 posts
Joined: July 21, 2002
KitMaker: 3,569 posts
Armorama: 2,070 posts
Posted: Friday, August 12, 2005 - 02:19 AM UTC
Is it 1/35th or 1/72?
There was little to no text accompanying the photos and the item number does not have a 35 or a 72 in it.
Anyone know?
Mike
There was little to no text accompanying the photos and the item number does not have a 35 or a 72 in it.
Anyone know?
Mike
Darktrooper
Delaware, United States
Joined: November 05, 2004
KitMaker: 581 posts
Armorama: 351 posts
Joined: November 05, 2004
KitMaker: 581 posts
Armorama: 351 posts
Posted: Friday, August 12, 2005 - 03:18 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I thought it looked okay. Anyone fill out the dream-model survey?
I requested an M-103 Heavy Tank
I did but I requested an a 48th scale Avro Lancaster with options for wheels up, bomb bay details with open bomb bay doors, moveable gun turrets, detailed cockpit.
Biggles2
Quebec, Canada
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Joined: January 01, 2004
KitMaker: 7,600 posts
Armorama: 6,110 posts
Posted: Friday, August 26, 2005 - 05:44 PM UTC
Judging from the enormous size of the unfilled joints of the gun breech, it must be '72nd. Can't see that happening in '35th. I haven't built my Dragon Nashorn yet, but the two models look suspiciously similar.
Violetrock
European Union
Joined: March 09, 2003
KitMaker: 831 posts
Armorama: 791 posts
Joined: March 09, 2003
KitMaker: 831 posts
Armorama: 791 posts
Posted: Friday, August 26, 2005 - 11:39 PM UTC
It is 1/72, Revell doesn´t release any 1/35 this year.
Thomas
Thomas