Could be good dio ideas.....
http://www.pbase.com/greywolf2003/tank_recovery
http://www.pbase.com/greywolf2003/lav_recovery
Enjoy !
Frenchy
Hosted by Darren Baker
Bogged down OIF Abrams and LAV pictures

Frenchy

Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts

Posted: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 - 09:32 PM UTC

seb43

Joined: August 30, 2005
KitMaker: 2,315 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 - 01:39 AM UTC
Thank for sharing this mate
more than 0.5 g/l for the tank driver ??
merci
seb
more than 0.5 g/l for the tank driver ??
merci
seb

Frenchy

Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 - 02:09 AM UTC
Quoted Text
more than 0.5 g/l for the tank driver ??
I don't know...But I hope he had a good pressure washer !

Frenchy

seb43

Joined: August 30, 2005
KitMaker: 2,315 posts
Armorama: 2,158 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 - 02:35 AM UTC
Frenchy
well i'm also wondering if the M1 will work after.
Did you notice that the left track is missing on the flat bed trucks when it is still present where the tank is down in the dam, nevertheless the other track is still on even cover of mud.
Does any of us has any explanation about this accident ?
are mud baths good for tanks ?? :-) :-)
a+
seb
well i'm also wondering if the M1 will work after.
Did you notice that the left track is missing on the flat bed trucks when it is still present where the tank is down in the dam, nevertheless the other track is still on even cover of mud.
Does any of us has any explanation about this accident ?
are mud baths good for tanks ?? :-) :-)
a+
seb

Frenchy

Joined: December 02, 2002
KitMaker: 12,719 posts
Armorama: 12,507 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 - 03:34 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Does any of us has any explanation about this accident ?
Well I don't know about this very incident, but I've read several OIF stories about dykes collapsing under the weight of heavy AFVs and night driving along ditches being risky as well....
Frenchy

dsmith

Joined: August 22, 2003
KitMaker: 183 posts
Armorama: 92 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 - 03:57 AM UTC
Very interesting. I think that would make quite an interesting dio

jazza

Joined: August 03, 2005
KitMaker: 2,709 posts
Armorama: 1,818 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 - 05:57 AM UTC
Definitely would make a nice dio indeed. Question is, how do you get a figurine that would have the same guilty expressions as the ones in these photos?


Burik

Joined: March 12, 2002
KitMaker: 1,437 posts
Armorama: 1,303 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 - 06:41 AM UTC
In the first gallery, I am wondering what the men leaning against the tank are wearing around their shoulders. Is this new? Or is it something that just is not worn that much (i've read where men have removed their armor plates from their IBA for convenience sake)?
Bob
Bob

SSG_Q

Joined: June 21, 2005
KitMaker: 115 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 - 07:17 AM UTC
Well, everyone here seems well versed in the unfortunate events that are not combat related. The roads along irragation ditches were designed for tractors, obviously not tanks. This was/is a common occurance in Iraq and Afghanistan. Even the HMMWV has difficulties because it is wider than the typical civilian car in those regions, and most roads in Afghanistan are not paved. And we try to avoid roads for obvious reasons.
Ther unique items seen on the shoulders in a couple of pictures is a supplemental piecs of body armor to protect the shoulder and armpit. This could easily be scratch built with thin foil.
Ther unique items seen on the shoulders in a couple of pictures is a supplemental piecs of body armor to protect the shoulder and armpit. This could easily be scratch built with thin foil.


M1A2sep1CD

Joined: August 01, 2005
KitMaker: 87 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 - 12:45 PM UTC
ok, explanations for the above from a tanker thats been there,
the angle at which the tank slid into the ditch unloaded the left suspension and the slide helped walk the track off, to load it on the hett it was probably eeasier, since the tank didnt run, if it did you could have probABly set it down and drove it back into its tracks,
the shoulder stuff we call our wings, there just additional kevlar material, on our shoulders to stop spalling and smaller shrapnel, they really dont stop anything so there really useless, but still required dependant on local SOP
the angle at which the tank slid into the ditch unloaded the left suspension and the slide helped walk the track off, to load it on the hett it was probably eeasier, since the tank didnt run, if it did you could have probABly set it down and drove it back into its tracks,
the shoulder stuff we call our wings, there just additional kevlar material, on our shoulders to stop spalling and smaller shrapnel, they really dont stop anything so there really useless, but still required dependant on local SOP

Grumpyoldman


Joined: October 17, 2003
KitMaker: 15,338 posts
Armorama: 7,297 posts

Posted: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 - 08:35 PM UTC
Interesting photos, thanks for the link.

Tankleader

Joined: April 29, 2003
KitMaker: 718 posts
Armorama: 684 posts

Posted: Thursday, October 13, 2005 - 11:26 PM UTC
Hello All,
I can't remember which Marine Tank Bn or Company the tank is from but remember reading and briefing my boss on this. The tank was recovered and repaired. I retired shortly after so I didn't get the full story but the vehicle wasn't a write off it was repaired.
Semper FI
Andy
I can't remember which Marine Tank Bn or Company the tank is from but remember reading and briefing my boss on this. The tank was recovered and repaired. I retired shortly after so I didn't get the full story but the vehicle wasn't a write off it was repaired.
Semper FI
Andy
![]() |