Was it common to see a Tiger I with a headlamp knocked off? You can probably guess why I'm asking this...
Thanks.
Chris
Hosted by Darren Baker
Tiger I question
Black_Water
Missouri, United States
Joined: May 03, 2005
KitMaker: 94 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: May 03, 2005
KitMaker: 94 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 10, 2005 - 09:33 AM UTC
Taylornic
Tennessee, United States
Joined: January 10, 2005
KitMaker: 337 posts
Armorama: 332 posts
Joined: January 10, 2005
KitMaker: 337 posts
Armorama: 332 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 10, 2005 - 10:07 AM UTC
I have some spare Tamiya ones if they will help you.
Posted: Saturday, December 10, 2005 - 10:09 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Was it common to see a Tiger I with a headlamp knocked off? You can probably guess why I'm asking this.
I think you can pretty well get away with any "soft" fittings being missing from AFV's that have been in battle.
Black_Water
Missouri, United States
Joined: May 03, 2005
KitMaker: 94 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: May 03, 2005
KitMaker: 94 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 10, 2005 - 02:28 PM UTC
Thanks for the replies. I thought I could probably get away with an absent lamp, since I have already banged up the fenders a bit, but I just wanted a second opinion.
Taylor: I should have said that I'm building in 1/72, so the Tamiya parts won't really do me any good. Thanks for the offer, though.
Thanks again
Chris
Taylor: I should have said that I'm building in 1/72, so the Tamiya parts won't really do me any good. Thanks for the offer, though.
Thanks again
Chris
Taylornic
Tennessee, United States
Joined: January 10, 2005
KitMaker: 337 posts
Armorama: 332 posts
Joined: January 10, 2005
KitMaker: 337 posts
Armorama: 332 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 10, 2005 - 03:16 PM UTC
Hey Chris, you are very welcome!
Good luck!
Good luck!
ericadeane
Michigan, United States
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Joined: October 28, 2002
KitMaker: 4,021 posts
Armorama: 3,947 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 10, 2005 - 04:22 PM UTC
The headlamps were removeable and would be done so in anticipation of heavy enemy action. They'd be stored inside the tank. You can be safe!
thebear
Quebec, Canada
Joined: November 15, 2002
KitMaker: 3,960 posts
Armorama: 3,579 posts
Joined: November 15, 2002
KitMaker: 3,960 posts
Armorama: 3,579 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 10, 2005 - 05:38 PM UTC
I have to agree with Roy on this one ...they were removed more times than not ...so you will probably be better off with the lights off ..There was a cap that fitted over the fitting to keep dirt out though.
Rick
Rick
ekke
Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany
Joined: June 08, 2004
KitMaker: 285 posts
Armorama: 229 posts
Joined: June 08, 2004
KitMaker: 285 posts
Armorama: 229 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 10, 2005 - 05:42 PM UTC
If sou still want the light, I could send it to you, I got the Revell Tiger E with 50% of the parts missing (thanks to an "accident"), but the lights are still there
Greetings, ekke
Greetings, ekke
grapejuice
Iowa, United States
Joined: November 26, 2005
KitMaker: 35 posts
Armorama: 34 posts
Joined: November 26, 2005
KitMaker: 35 posts
Armorama: 34 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 10, 2005 - 07:35 PM UTC
I'm with Roy on this one too; I personally like battle damage though so if you already have some of that then you're good to go with either reason.
Black_Water
Missouri, United States
Joined: May 03, 2005
KitMaker: 94 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: May 03, 2005
KitMaker: 94 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 11, 2005 - 01:20 AM UTC
Thanks, everyone! I think I'll just leave the lights off, since that seems more historically accurate. And again, thanks for all the replacement offers!
Chris
Chris