Hello all
could some one please tell me what type of gun that is on the back and if it is a jeep
Thank you https://armorama.kitmaker.net/modules.php?set_albumName=album18&id=aaa&op=modload&name=gallery&file=index&include=view_photo.php
Hosted by Darren Baker
Is this a jeep?
andy007
Wellington, New Zealand
Joined: May 01, 2002
KitMaker: 2,088 posts
Armorama: 1,257 posts
Joined: May 01, 2002
KitMaker: 2,088 posts
Armorama: 1,257 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 10:23 AM UTC
Kencelot
Florida, United States
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 10:29 AM UTC
The gun is a 37mm anti tank gun. The truck is a Dodge WC55 (3/4ton weapons carrier).
The vehicle was the M6 37mm Gun Motor Carriage.
The vehicle was the M6 37mm Gun Motor Carriage.
AIRB842586
Arizona, United States
Joined: October 09, 2002
KitMaker: 261 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: October 09, 2002
KitMaker: 261 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 10:33 AM UTC
A very interesting piece of equipment, does look a bit like a jeep, never seen one before. Was is widely used?
WeWillHold
Wisconsin, United States
Joined: April 17, 2002
KitMaker: 2,314 posts
Armorama: 1,905 posts
Joined: April 17, 2002
KitMaker: 2,314 posts
Armorama: 1,905 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 10:34 AM UTC
Andy, I'm just shooting from the hip here, but I believe that may be a Weapons Carrier rather than a jeep. Look's like a 50cal on the front, (can you imagine trying to hit something the way that guy is positioned??), and that's probably a 37mm on the back end.
Other's far more knowledgable than I will correct me if I'm wrong, (and have specifics about this vehicle for you). Neat picture!
Other's far more knowledgable than I will correct me if I'm wrong, (and have specifics about this vehicle for you). Neat picture!
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 10:43 AM UTC
Yes, it was pretty widely used early in WWII as an anti-tank weapons system before armored Tank Killers such as the M10 and M36 came into use. Italeri used to offer this as one of the variants of their old Peerless dodge 3/4 ton truck series. It is still pretty easy to find in hobby shops or on-line auction sites.
AIRB842586
Arizona, United States
Joined: October 09, 2002
KitMaker: 261 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: October 09, 2002
KitMaker: 261 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 10:51 AM UTC
Thanks Gino, there isn't anything you can't learn from this site. I'm gonna start posting my math homework!
#:-)
#:-)
Kencelot
Florida, United States
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 11:05 AM UTC
It started as the T21, than was changed to the M4 37mm GMC, than changed again to the M6 37mm GMC.
This vehicle was designed as a stop-gap until the T22 GMC was available. Production began in '42 and lasted through till the fall. Unofficially it was called the "Fargo" because it was manufactured by the Fargo Division of Chrysler. About 5400 were produced.
It was in combat in North Africa and proved to be a disaster as a TD. In the Pacific theater it was more successful.
Most were stripped of their guns and converted back to WCs.
This vehicle was designed as a stop-gap until the T22 GMC was available. Production began in '42 and lasted through till the fall. Unofficially it was called the "Fargo" because it was manufactured by the Fargo Division of Chrysler. About 5400 were produced.
It was in combat in North Africa and proved to be a disaster as a TD. In the Pacific theater it was more successful.
Most were stripped of their guns and converted back to WCs.
shiryon
New York, United States
Joined: April 26, 2002
KitMaker: 876 posts
Armorama: 606 posts
Joined: April 26, 2002
KitMaker: 876 posts
Armorama: 606 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 11:43 AM UTC
I actually remember some pics of the marines using the vehicle(without .50 though)
Josh Weingarten
aKa shiryon
Josh Weingarten
aKa shiryon
Armor135
Ohio, United States
Joined: March 02, 2002
KitMaker: 335 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: March 02, 2002
KitMaker: 335 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 12:49 PM UTC
I recgonize the gun, doesnt Skybow do a kit that resembles that picture.?
Never seen a 50cal. positioned on the front of a jeep like that, anyone know why they did that? For protection against aircraft, while they were firing the gun in the back??
Mike
Never seen a 50cal. positioned on the front of a jeep like that, anyone know why they did that? For protection against aircraft, while they were firing the gun in the back??
Mike
Kencelot
Florida, United States
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 01:36 PM UTC
Skybow makes the WC51 which is the closest to the WC55 that's out there. (new kit wise) No AT gun in the kit though. The only glaring differences is the WC55 needs the tow winch on the front and the bed sides need to be omitted.
WC51
WC55
Italeri's offering is this (like Heavy said- the old Peerless Max kit): This is not that bad a kit - it would greatly benefit from the Eduard PE set # 35046...if you can find it.
WC51
WC55
Italeri's offering is this (like Heavy said- the old Peerless Max kit): This is not that bad a kit - it would greatly benefit from the Eduard PE set # 35046...if you can find it.
andy007
Wellington, New Zealand
Joined: May 01, 2002
KitMaker: 2,088 posts
Armorama: 1,257 posts
Joined: May 01, 2002
KitMaker: 2,088 posts
Armorama: 1,257 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 02:35 PM UTC
This is probaly a silly question but could you mount a anti tank gun on the back of a jeep?
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 03:20 PM UTC
Quoted Text
It would probably be possible to mount the 37mm gun on there, but the ¼ ton capacity of the Jeep versus the ¾ ton capacity of the Beep probably wouldn't allow for any ammo or additional crew members to be carried. Besides, the recoil would be the biggest difficulty to handle.This is probaly a silly question but could you mount a anti tank gun on the back of a jeep?
ARMDCAV
United States
Joined: July 29, 2002
KitMaker: 115 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: July 29, 2002
KitMaker: 115 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 03:39 PM UTC
The only weapon I've seen bigger than 50. cal mounted on a jeep was the 106mm recoiles rifle.
Eagle
Noord-Brabant, Netherlands
Joined: May 22, 2002
KitMaker: 4,082 posts
Armorama: 1,993 posts
Joined: May 22, 2002
KitMaker: 4,082 posts
Armorama: 1,993 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 05:41 PM UTC
Quoted Text
I'm just shooting from the hip here
You're just like the guys on the left on the pic then.....he's shooting from the hip too.. #:-)
Roadkill
Antwerpen, Belgium
Joined: June 09, 2002
KitMaker: 2,029 posts
Armorama: 822 posts
Joined: June 09, 2002
KitMaker: 2,029 posts
Armorama: 822 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 08:02 PM UTC
I thave this Italery kit on the shelf and I read about that Eduard PE set # 35046.
I searched the Eduard website but can't vind it , what kind of PE set is it and is it still on the market or out of prod.?
(:-) (:-)
I searched the Eduard website but can't vind it , what kind of PE set is it and is it still on the market or out of prod.?
(:-) (:-)
MrRoo
Queensland, Australia
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 09:27 PM UTC
Quoted Text
In a tech manual I have on MG mounts for vehicles 1943 it was officially a very big NO NO to mount anything larger than a 30 Cal MG on a jeep. However what was done unofficially in the field is another matter. Does anyone have photos (original WW2) of anything bigger mounted on a jeep?The only weapon I've seen bigger than 50. cal mounted on a jeep was the 106mm recoiles rifle.
Cliff
ukgeoff
England - North East, United Kingdom
Joined: May 03, 2002
KitMaker: 1,007 posts
Armorama: 703 posts
Joined: May 03, 2002
KitMaker: 1,007 posts
Armorama: 703 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 10:03 PM UTC
In actual fact , a 37mm gun was mounted on a Jeep, but only experimentally. The jeep used was the early Bantam design.
Kencelot
Florida, United States
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 10:39 PM UTC
Ronny, the PE set for the Italeri M6 is OOP. I've been looking for one for a while now.
Great pics Geoff!
Great pics Geoff!
Roadkill
Antwerpen, Belgium
Joined: June 09, 2002
KitMaker: 2,029 posts
Armorama: 822 posts
Joined: June 09, 2002
KitMaker: 2,029 posts
Armorama: 822 posts
Posted: Saturday, December 21, 2002 - 10:46 PM UTC
DAMN
stugiiif
Virginia, United States
Joined: December 13, 2002
KitMaker: 1,434 posts
Armorama: 868 posts
Joined: December 13, 2002
KitMaker: 1,434 posts
Armorama: 868 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 22, 2002 - 02:23 AM UTC
that is an M6 37mm GMC (gun motor carriage) and according to SQUDRON'S US TANK DESTROYER in ACTION they were grossly inefficient and production was stoped those in service were converted into to weapons carries. but that is a great pic...stug
MrRoo
Queensland, Australia
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Posted: Sunday, December 22, 2002 - 08:24 PM UTC
Quoted Text
In actual fact , a 37mm gun was mounted on a Jeep, but only experimentally. The jeep used was the early Bantam design. COOL. the recoil from the rear facing one would mean a faster getaway.
Cliff
ARENGCA
Arizona, United States
Joined: February 13, 2002
KitMaker: 382 posts
Armorama: 267 posts
Joined: February 13, 2002
KitMaker: 382 posts
Armorama: 267 posts
Posted: Monday, December 23, 2002 - 12:13 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextIn a tech manual I have on MG mounts for vehicles 1943 it was officially a very big NO NO to mount anything larger than a 30 Cal MG on a jeep. However what was done unofficially in the field is another matter. Does anyone have photos (original WW2) of anything bigger mounted on a jeep?The only weapon I've seen bigger than 50. cal mounted on a jeep was the 106mm recoiles rifle.
The problem is the recoil of the weapon. The mount of the weapon has to transmit the recoil to the vehicle itself. Since the bed of many light vehicles is basically sheet metal, bolting the mount to the bed isn't a lot of help. Even reinforcing the bed, or bolting the mount through to the frame doesn't help a lot if the frame is not designed for the stress. A .50 cal would literally rip the mount out of the floor of the jeep. The official line was "no" because they don't want their jeeps ruined. The guy-in-the-mud line was 'hell, yes!" because then he didn't have to carry it, and he didn't care about ruining the jeep. The problem with mounting a 37mm gun in a jeep isn't so much whether it will carry it, but more whether you will get more than a few shots before the gun falls off.
The truck mounted AT gun program was doomed from the beginning. The guns were underpowered, and only marginally effective at a shorter range than the 50+mm guns of the Germans (North Africa). Only a very foolhardy soldier will engage a tank inside it's effective range with a gun that can't always knock it out.