I found this very interesting concept pic and article descibing this "Articulated Tracked Armored Vehicles (ATAV)."
excerpt:
A configuration, consisting of a central section and two transport/recovery sections connected to the central section is proposed. The sections can be uncoupled from one another and used separately.
The main advantages of this configuration are:
- the main combat properties of the tank (maneuverability and firepower) can be used separately on the battlefield by employing the combat and two transport/recovery sections independently of one another. This can boost the tank's efficiency due to the purposeful and separate designing of each section. Using the above sections in such a way, units on the battlefield may change their tactics to achieve higher effectiveness and make the tactics more suitable to the type of combat actions and to the operational environment. This can be exemplified by operations in Bosnia, where all tanks were normally used as self-propelled guns while artillery systems were mainly employed from fixed emplacements;
- combination of standard transport/recovery sections with central sections outfitted with different war-fighting, support, and auxiliary equipment provides for the development of a family of such articulated vehicles as infantry combat vehicles, armored recovery vehicles, reconnaissance vehicles, supply vehicles, medical evacuation vehicles, etc. The need for such vehicles stems from the fact that a great number of wheeled transport vehicles have to provide tank units with various supplies, including fuel and ammunition, as well as to repair and recover damaged tanks. However, the cross-country ability of wheeled vehicles is much lower than that of tanks;
- compared with traditional tanks, there is a greater vacant armor-protected space inside the central section of the articulated vehicle obtained because of the absence of a track assembly. The requisite facilities needed to support the crew for a protracted period of time, including sleeping places, can be arranged there. Thus, the standard requirements for ergonomics can be implemented in the design of the vehicles.
The combat tracked armored articulated vehicle consists of a combat section and two transport/recovery sections. The combat section is hinge-mounted between the...
The whole article can be found here: WITH A NEW TANK INTO THE NEW CENTURY
Any thoughts on this?
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
Speaking Of Unusual Armor
Kencelot
Florida, United States
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Joined: December 27, 2001
KitMaker: 4,268 posts
Armorama: 2,804 posts
Posted: Monday, December 23, 2002 - 04:22 PM UTC
stugiiif
Virginia, United States
Joined: December 13, 2002
KitMaker: 1,434 posts
Armorama: 868 posts
Joined: December 13, 2002
KitMaker: 1,434 posts
Armorama: 868 posts
Posted: Monday, December 23, 2002 - 08:22 PM UTC
well it interesting, reminds me of the carl moser, with the rail way truck for transport, and tracks for ground travel. got any more fun stuff?
sarge18
Kentucky, United States
Joined: November 09, 2002
KitMaker: 272 posts
Armorama: 267 posts
Joined: November 09, 2002
KitMaker: 272 posts
Armorama: 267 posts
Posted: Tuesday, December 24, 2002 - 09:24 AM UTC
Something similar was discussed in Hunnicutt's Abrams, going all the way down from large tank with the push me pull you setup, down to individual tankettes with rocket packs. Rather interesting idea to try, someday.