Greetings all
Could anyone give me an idea as to the quality of the following kits and also their usage by Commonwealth Forces during WW2.
201 - GMC 2 1/2 ton 700 Gallon Fuel Tanker ( Single 700 Gall tank )
205 - GMC 2 1/2 ton truck CCKW 353
230 - Dodge WC 62 / 63 1 1/2 ton 6 x 6 truck
I believe that 205 has been re-released with a hard and soft top, is this so and is the kit number 6271?
Does anyone know if any manufacturer does a 15 cwt Water Bowser or is their a towed bowser that would fit with commonwealth vehicles - preferably in plastic?
As always, many thanks.
Cheers
Al
Hosted by Darren Baker
Italeri - Trucks, Trucks and Trucks - 1/35
Posted: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 - 08:39 PM UTC
Yeti01012001
England - North West, United Kingdom
Joined: July 28, 2005
KitMaker: 360 posts
Armorama: 334 posts
Joined: July 28, 2005
KitMaker: 360 posts
Armorama: 334 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 - 08:48 PM UTC
AL
I thave just bought the 205 - GMC 2 1/2 ton truck CCKW 353 and the kit is really good. not that much problems with it. You don't get a canvas with it or the poles, but it does give you the dimensions etc to make them
The only difficult part is the seat area in the back of the truck if you are going to have infantry sitting on the back.
hope this helps
G
I thave just bought the 205 - GMC 2 1/2 ton truck CCKW 353 and the kit is really good. not that much problems with it. You don't get a canvas with it or the poles, but it does give you the dimensions etc to make them
The only difficult part is the seat area in the back of the truck if you are going to have infantry sitting on the back.
hope this helps
G
Posted: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 - 09:16 PM UTC
Hi Gary,
Thanks for that.
Al
Thanks for that.
Al
dexter059
Region de Valparaiso, Chile
Joined: July 28, 2005
KitMaker: 1,569 posts
Armorama: 1,385 posts
Joined: July 28, 2005
KitMaker: 1,569 posts
Armorama: 1,385 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 - 10:15 PM UTC
if you can get the italeri #201 (with the tanks in the back), do it. Itīs a nice kit, a bit tricky chassis assembly, but nothing to worry about. And itīs discontinued The same with 6x6 WC 62, also discontinued (itīs an old reboxed ex Peerless kit)
cheers
cheers
Halfyank
Colorado, United States
Joined: February 01, 2003
KitMaker: 5,221 posts
Armorama: 1,245 posts
Joined: February 01, 2003
KitMaker: 5,221 posts
Armorama: 1,245 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 - 10:31 PM UTC
I really like Italeri trucks. I built undercarriage of the 2.5 ton truck, before my dog ate it, and I liked the way it went together. Mr Roo, one of our resident truck experts, says the machine gun mount on the hard top kit isn't accurate, but it's an interesting thing to have. The one thing about Italeri trucks seems to be that they have more parts in the suspension than Tamiya, for example.
ukgeoff
England - North East, United Kingdom
Joined: May 03, 2002
KitMaker: 1,007 posts
Armorama: 703 posts
Joined: May 03, 2002
KitMaker: 1,007 posts
Armorama: 703 posts
Posted: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 - 11:23 PM UTC
Unless the cost is an issue and you can get the Italeri Dodge 1.5 ton cheap, you would be better off with the AFV Club (ex Skybow) kit. The old Italeri kit is OK if you keep in mind it first came out in the 70's. The newer AFV/Skybow kit is a quantum leap ahead in quality and detail.
Posted: Thursday, April 13, 2006 - 12:35 AM UTC
Hi All,
Thanks for all the information so far. Geoff I'll check out the AFV Club kit as well.
Thanks again.
Al
Thanks for all the information so far. Geoff I'll check out the AFV Club kit as well.
Thanks again.
Al
MrRoo
Queensland, Australia
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 13, 2006 - 01:59 AM UTC
Any time I see the Italeri GMC kits for sale and I can afford them I add them to my stash. They are not an add glue to box and shake kit like the Tamiya GMC kit but are still very worthwhile getting. Aber has a closed cab PE set which would enhance the cargo hardcab and eduard has a PE set for the water tanker if needed as well.
Unless I was desperate I would not buy the Dodge as the AFV/Skybow one is far superior in almost every way.
Cheers
Cliff
Unless I was desperate I would not buy the Dodge as the AFV/Skybow one is far superior in almost every way.
Cheers
Cliff
Posted: Thursday, April 13, 2006 - 02:16 AM UTC
Greetings all,
Thanks for all the input that's most helpful and gives me a clear idea of what to go for.
Cheers
Al
Thanks for all the input that's most helpful and gives me a clear idea of what to go for.
Cheers
Al
shermanm4
Malta
Joined: April 02, 2006
KitMaker: 2 posts
Armorama: 2 posts
Joined: April 02, 2006
KitMaker: 2 posts
Armorama: 2 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 13, 2006 - 03:09 AM UTC
Whats wrong about the MG mount...is it ridiculously incorrect?
TIA
Matthew
TIA
Matthew
MrRoo
Queensland, Australia
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Joined: October 07, 2002
KitMaker: 3,856 posts
Armorama: 2,984 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 13, 2006 - 03:27 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Whats wrong about the MG mount...is it ridiculously incorrect?
TIA
Matthew
It is very inaccurate being a mixture of two different types of mount.
The gun ring part is ok it is the method of attaching it to the truck that is at fault. It is an easy fix though with some sheet plastic and a decent photo of the correct mount.
Cheers
Cliff
Spuds
Georgia, United States
Joined: August 31, 2002
KitMaker: 393 posts
Armorama: 287 posts
Joined: August 31, 2002
KitMaker: 393 posts
Armorama: 287 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 13, 2006 - 03:41 AM UTC
Cliff, you may have done this before in another thread, but, if not, maybe you could post a photo and explain what you're talking about. As far as softskins go, you're the guru of all.
Hollowpoint
Kansas, United States
Joined: January 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,748 posts
Armorama: 1,797 posts
Joined: January 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,748 posts
Armorama: 1,797 posts
Posted: Thursday, April 13, 2006 - 03:46 AM UTC
Quoted Text
201 - GMC 2 1/2 ton 700 Gallon Fuel Tanker ( Single 700 Gall tank )
Cliff kind of slipped this info into his post, but let me emphasize -- this is not a fuel truck ... it is a water truck.
Posted: Thursday, April 13, 2006 - 03:54 AM UTC
Hi Bob,
No problem, that was a cut and paste from a different conversation. I know 201 is a water tanker, but well spotted.
Cheers
Al
No problem, that was a cut and paste from a different conversation. I know 201 is a water tanker, but well spotted.
Cheers
Al