Hosted by Darren Baker
Stuff that would NOT be on a modern AFV
Chris_T
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: June 16, 2005
KitMaker: 41 posts
Armorama: 40 posts
Joined: June 16, 2005
KitMaker: 41 posts
Armorama: 40 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 - 06:38 AM UTC
Hey all, I was wondering, we've all seen all kinds of stuff piled on, hung off of, and strapped to modern fighting vehicles, but what kinds of things would NOT be allowed to be carried on a tank, Bradley, Hummer, or Stryker? I'm currently working on a 1/35th USMC M1A1HA for a diorama of the 2003 Iraq invasion and also have an M1025 Humvee in the same scale, and when looking at pics of other models here, I've seen some things I didn't expect to see, including what looked like an AT-4 anti-tank rocket on the turret roof of one Abrams kit. Would such weapons be allowed to be carried by the crew of the real tanks, and what other items would they be forbidden from having with them? Look forward to hearing from you all, and wish you well.
GSPatton
California, United States
Joined: September 04, 2002
KitMaker: 1,411 posts
Armorama: 609 posts
Joined: September 04, 2002
KitMaker: 1,411 posts
Armorama: 609 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 - 06:47 AM UTC
Typically things that could explode are not usually hung on the sides, or turret baskets. Otherwise all is fair game. Tanke a look at the photos stored on this site for ideas on stowage.
erichvon
England - East Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: January 17, 2006
KitMaker: 1,694 posts
Armorama: 1,584 posts
Joined: January 17, 2006
KitMaker: 1,694 posts
Armorama: 1,584 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 - 06:50 AM UTC
To be honest Chris I think it's got to be down to the individual. I was in the infantry late 80's /early 90's and was constantly moaned at by my CSM for non standard webbing ( I tended to throw away the issue stuff as it was crap and build my own from personal purchase stuff). There are no hard and fast rules really applying to the subject. I know the US has always had better resources kitwise but if you're in an AFV you don't have to carry it and soldiers being soldiers will always...err...liberate stuff that may be useful. Personally I wouldn't put AT stuff on top of a tank but who knows.RPG's as souvenirs?
2CAVTrooper
Alabama, United States
Joined: October 21, 2005
KitMaker: 310 posts
Armorama: 302 posts
Joined: October 21, 2005
KitMaker: 310 posts
Armorama: 302 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 - 07:59 AM UTC
We'd strap AT-4's (or Vipers if in training) to the gun ring on our hummers........Comes in handy when you come around a curve and there is a "BRDM" or something on the side of the road
barron
Virginia, United States
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 666 posts
Armorama: 598 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 666 posts
Armorama: 598 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 - 08:27 AM UTC
LAW rockets were part of our combat load, on our M60-A3s. along with mines and anything else we could carry.
Burik
New Jersey, United States
Joined: March 12, 2002
KitMaker: 1,437 posts
Armorama: 1,303 posts
Joined: March 12, 2002
KitMaker: 1,437 posts
Armorama: 1,303 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 - 08:29 AM UTC
Chris:
I am not as knowledgeable on Marine tanks as Army tanks, but in OIF1 the 3rd ID did have tankers carrying AT-4s on their turrets. Most TCs also had an M4 handy as well. These items were at hand on the turret roof for basically the same reason; close-in urban fighting was expected, and it was felt that it would be impracticle to expect that all targets would be picked up with the main gun or even the MGs. It was felt that one could take out a threat quicker w/ an AT-4 rather than trying to slew the main gun around fast enough in a tight spot. Or, if the gunner was otherwise engaged the TC could still deal w/ a second threat with the At-4. It was common for Humvees to have them strapped to the rear portion of the roofs too.
When I was at the NTC I noticed Javelins on the roofs of the Strykers of 3/2. The recon guys especially liked to carry Javelins in case they ran into something while scouting, but I also saw them on the ICVs.
Here is a photo of my co-author's tank as they were preparing for the border crossing in OIF1. This is half of the platoon's set-up; the other two tanks stuff was on his other fender.
Bob
Note all the scratches on the paint. That is a whole nother topic, but many have the impression the Abrams paint does not chip. But it must be remembered these tanks went through heavy training going back to October or November of 02, so they saw plenty of service before the war even started.
I am not as knowledgeable on Marine tanks as Army tanks, but in OIF1 the 3rd ID did have tankers carrying AT-4s on their turrets. Most TCs also had an M4 handy as well. These items were at hand on the turret roof for basically the same reason; close-in urban fighting was expected, and it was felt that it would be impracticle to expect that all targets would be picked up with the main gun or even the MGs. It was felt that one could take out a threat quicker w/ an AT-4 rather than trying to slew the main gun around fast enough in a tight spot. Or, if the gunner was otherwise engaged the TC could still deal w/ a second threat with the At-4. It was common for Humvees to have them strapped to the rear portion of the roofs too.
When I was at the NTC I noticed Javelins on the roofs of the Strykers of 3/2. The recon guys especially liked to carry Javelins in case they ran into something while scouting, but I also saw them on the ICVs.
Here is a photo of my co-author's tank as they were preparing for the border crossing in OIF1. This is half of the platoon's set-up; the other two tanks stuff was on his other fender.
Bob
Note all the scratches on the paint. That is a whole nother topic, but many have the impression the Abrams paint does not chip. But it must be remembered these tanks went through heavy training going back to October or November of 02, so they saw plenty of service before the war even started.
Chris_T
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: June 16, 2005
KitMaker: 41 posts
Armorama: 40 posts
Joined: June 16, 2005
KitMaker: 41 posts
Armorama: 40 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 - 04:32 PM UTC
What are those red & black canisters supposed to be? I'm assuming they have something to do with the AT-4's, but not sure what.
matt
Campaigns Administrator
New York, United States
Joined: February 28, 2002
KitMaker: 5,957 posts
Armorama: 2,956 posts
Joined: February 28, 2002
KitMaker: 5,957 posts
Armorama: 2,956 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 - 05:13 PM UTC
Grenades....... they ship them in a Cardboard tube.....
Epi
Texas, United States
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Joined: December 22, 2001
KitMaker: 3,586 posts
Armorama: 2,556 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 - 07:09 PM UTC
The five small canisters on the left are Frag Grenades, the 4 and 5 taller canisters on the right are Smoke Grenades, and the red canisters are Incinderary Grenades which look sort of like smoke grenades but are red.
keenan
Indiana, United States
Joined: October 16, 2002
KitMaker: 5,272 posts
Armorama: 2,844 posts
Joined: October 16, 2002
KitMaker: 5,272 posts
Armorama: 2,844 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 - 09:12 PM UTC
Thanks for the good first hand info on the turret load out. For a second there I thought someone was stocking up on Model Model OD paint in the rattle cans.
Shaun
Shaun
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 - 11:08 PM UTC
I see a lot of modelers place spare main gun ammunition on the exterior of the vehicle. Many times the rounds are piled up like so many pick-up-sticks.
In actuality, main gun ammo (or artillery rounds) are carried in follow on support vehicles and would not be uncrated until ready to be uploaded onto the tank or selp-propelled gun.
Uncased rounds would not be something you would find on the sides of the vehicle or piled on top and strapped down.
In actuality, main gun ammo (or artillery rounds) are carried in follow on support vehicles and would not be uncrated until ready to be uploaded onto the tank or selp-propelled gun.
Uncased rounds would not be something you would find on the sides of the vehicle or piled on top and strapped down.
Jacques
Minnesota, United States
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 - 12:23 AM UTC
Sabot...maybe.
I have not seen any modern stuff like that, but in Korea and Especially in WWII there are a fair number of pictures with artillery pieces overloaded with shells. It was strictly against SOP, but they did it any way (some were ordered to). The assumption is that noone would WANT spare ammo on the exterior of a M1...but some yahoos may have done it, especailly in the bustle rack.
Oh, and I have seen the left over cardboard shipping tubes for main gun ammo used as storage devices in the bustle rack as well...
I have not seen any modern stuff like that, but in Korea and Especially in WWII there are a fair number of pictures with artillery pieces overloaded with shells. It was strictly against SOP, but they did it any way (some were ordered to). The assumption is that noone would WANT spare ammo on the exterior of a M1...but some yahoos may have done it, especailly in the bustle rack.
Oh, and I have seen the left over cardboard shipping tubes for main gun ammo used as storage devices in the bustle rack as well...
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 - 02:43 AM UTC
I challenge you to find any tanker today that knows what end of the round to stick into the breach who would consider piling extra combustible casing 120mm rounds on top of their tank a good idea.
As for WW2, Korea, and even Vietnam, not the same situations nor same equipment used today. I agree that there are plenty of situations in those wars where main gun rounds are piled up ready for use like artillery preps and anticipated attacks.
Times have changed. We aren't even the same Army as we were in the late 80s or early 90s.
As for WW2, Korea, and even Vietnam, not the same situations nor same equipment used today. I agree that there are plenty of situations in those wars where main gun rounds are piled up ready for use like artillery preps and anticipated attacks.
Times have changed. We aren't even the same Army as we were in the late 80s or early 90s.
ptruhe
Texas, United States
Joined: March 05, 2003
KitMaker: 2,092 posts
Armorama: 1,607 posts
Joined: March 05, 2003
KitMaker: 2,092 posts
Armorama: 1,607 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 - 08:24 AM UTC
Rob,
Would the exception be 1 or 2 of those metal tubes that were used to store war maps? In Germany, each of the tracks in the mortar platoon had 2 map tubes. I think they were 105 or 120mm main gun cannisters. I don't recall where the tankers strapped them.
Paul
Would the exception be 1 or 2 of those metal tubes that were used to store war maps? In Germany, each of the tracks in the mortar platoon had 2 map tubes. I think they were 105 or 120mm main gun cannisters. I don't recall where the tankers strapped them.
Paul
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 - 04:54 PM UTC
Those were 105mm artillery cans that we used for maps. Yes, each tank had one either strapped to the bustle rack or stuffed in the bustle rack. My point was uncased ammo rounds. I never mentioned anything about ammo cases, ammo tubes, ammo boxes, ammo crates, ammo cans or even spent main gun round casings. There are multiple uses for the empties of many of those items and that be found on a modern AFV.
I was trying to answer the post, "Stuff that would NOT be on a modern AFV".
I was trying to answer the post, "Stuff that would NOT be on a modern AFV".
ptruhe
Texas, United States
Joined: March 05, 2003
KitMaker: 2,092 posts
Armorama: 1,607 posts
Joined: March 05, 2003
KitMaker: 2,092 posts
Armorama: 1,607 posts
Posted: Wednesday, June 21, 2006 - 05:03 PM UTC
Doh. I must have focused on 'uncrated' instead of 'uncased'.
I guess I've been lucky enough to never see a model with uncased ammo laying around. That would be really strange.
I guess I've been lucky enough to never see a model with uncased ammo laying around. That would be really strange.
Jacques
Minnesota, United States
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Joined: March 04, 2003
KitMaker: 4,630 posts
Armorama: 4,498 posts
Posted: Monday, June 26, 2006 - 03:27 AM UTC
I was not saying I COULD prove anyone had piled ammo on the top of their tank, nor that they would. Only that some yahoo who probably DOES NOT know what end the shell goes in might do it. Ok, you might not want to model THAT particular tank.
And as for artillery pieces loaded with piles of ready to fire ammo...well, Gun Bunnies are a very special breed. :-) THAT does not surprise me. (Well, also the fact that GOOD gun batteries go through ammo fast...)
And as for artillery pieces loaded with piles of ready to fire ammo...well, Gun Bunnies are a very special breed. :-) THAT does not surprise me. (Well, also the fact that GOOD gun batteries go through ammo fast...)
barron
Virginia, United States
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 666 posts
Armorama: 598 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 666 posts
Armorama: 598 posts
Posted: Monday, June 26, 2006 - 03:34 AM UTC
The only ammo I ever kept on top of my tank was 50 cal and m240. the 105s and the 120s were kept inside. Never uncased on the outside.
2CAVTrooper
Alabama, United States
Joined: October 21, 2005
KitMaker: 310 posts
Armorama: 302 posts
Joined: October 21, 2005
KitMaker: 310 posts
Armorama: 302 posts
Posted: Monday, June 26, 2006 - 06:04 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Quoted TextGun Bunnies are a very special breed
Uh, yeah, you got that. Before being a 19K, I was trapped among the Redlegs as a 13F and 13E. Prime example, Mrosko, he was a 13B.
Heh, I was an 82C before becoming a 19D.
Hollowpoint
Kansas, United States
Joined: January 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,748 posts
Armorama: 1,797 posts
Joined: January 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,748 posts
Armorama: 1,797 posts
Posted: Monday, June 26, 2006 - 06:16 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I have not seen any modern stuff like that, but in Korea and Especially in WWII there are a fair number of pictures with artillery pieces overloaded with shells. It was strictly against SOP, but they did it any way (some were ordered to). The assumption is that noone would WANT spare ammo on the exterior of a M1...but some yahoos may have done it, especailly in the bustle rack.
Like Rob said, this would only be seen when tanks or guns were being used as set-piece artillery and NOT if they were on the move.
As far as what would not be carried on a modern AFV, well, I think that depends a lot on the unit. Some units have a strictly enforced load list and plan and others ... well, aren't as strac.
I once built a model of a friend's son's M1IP in Korea. The son's gunner sent a bunch of photos for me to use as reference and I laughed whe I looked at the stuff stashed in the bustle rack. Of course, it had the ammo-tube map cases, spare tracks, the 20mm ammo can "tool boxes" and the crew's ruck sacks, but it also had a grappling hook, a toilet brush, a Coleman cooler and a few 12-packs of soda. That was just for a few days in the field -- I can't imagine what these guys would take to war. And I won't even start on the stuff we used to haul out to the field in my old National Guard SP artillery battery...
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Monday, June 26, 2006 - 06:42 AM UTC
That toilet brush was normally used to scrub the mud off of your wet weather boots before climbing back on the tank.
Hollowpoint
Kansas, United States
Joined: January 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,748 posts
Armorama: 1,797 posts
Joined: January 24, 2002
KitMaker: 2,748 posts
Armorama: 1,797 posts
Posted: Monday, June 26, 2006 - 07:13 AM UTC
Quoted Text
That toilet brush was normally used to scrub the mud off of your wet weather boots before climbing back on the tank.
That makes sense for a stiff bristle brush (in fact , Gary (White4) told me the same thing once at a KC AMPS meeting), but this was one of those whimpy, almost lacey-looking swab-head jobs. I modelled it with a scrap of wedding veil material and a Evergreen strip handle. Doubt it would be much good against mud, but I assume it was used to clean something. Any ideas?
Johnston_RCR
Ontario, Canada
Joined: April 01, 2006
KitMaker: 470 posts
Armorama: 367 posts
Joined: April 01, 2006
KitMaker: 470 posts
Armorama: 367 posts
Posted: Monday, June 26, 2006 - 10:11 AM UTC
Quoted Text
I once built a model of a friend's son's M1IP in Korea. The son's gunner sent a bunch of photos for me to use as reference and I laughed whe I looked at the stuff stashed in the bustle rack. Of course, it had the ammo-tube map cases, spare tracks, the 20mm ammo can "tool boxes" and the crew's ruck sacks, but it also had a grappling hook, a toilet brush, a Coleman cooler and a few 12-packs of soda. That was just for a few days in the field -- I can't imagine what these guys would take to war. And I won't even start on the stuff we used to haul out to the field in my old National Guard SP artillery battery...
May just be me, but where would you find a grappling hook useful? All I can think of is to put a spotter/lookout on top of a building, and Im sure if the guy was resourceful enough he could easily find other ways, or a place that leaves him with more reliable escape options.