As most of you know I was DML’s technical advisor in M1A1AIM kit project. I had large influence on the contents of the kit, although of course final decisions were always made by DML and I’m not entirely happy with some choices made. Below are my personal comments on the kit.
Are you looking for a kit that can be quickly build without any fit problems and looks more or less like Abrams? Then of course you should buy… Tamiya kit! Yes, that’s correct. New DML kit is quite complex and requires a lot of time and patience to build it. There unfortunately are some minor fit problems - nothing that can’t be fixed with some basic modeling skills, but still it is not “shake & bake” kit. Most problems are result of less then perfect tooling quality. It is obvious for anyone who can directly compare latest DML Panzer IV or Tiger kits to the Abrams that the quality of molding in the latter is unfortunately not to the same standard as it was in latest WW2 German kits. DML pulled all stops during the kit design process, but unfortunately dropped a ball when it came to selection of toolmaker subcontractor… It doesn’t mean that the kit is poorly molded – no, it’s not that bad. But it could have been better and kit requires a bit more cleanup and trimming than other recent DML releases.
DML M1A1AIM is however much more accurate and much better detailed than Tamiya or any other M1 kit. So while it takes more time to build, it should result in a better replica.
For example separate engine deck panels require special attention – the fit is not perfect and some trimming is necessary. Still some minor gaps may be visible between some panels after assembly – hopefully won’t be noticeable under a coat of paint. Future DML M1 kits may (or may not…) include optional one piece engine deck for those modelers who don’t plan to open any of panels.
Many people expected that M1A1 kit would be based on parts from M1 Panther II kit. So did DML in February 2005 But when I joined the design team, it quickly became apparent that with the number of corrections required to make these parts accurate, it would be easier to retool the kit completely. The result is that only parts common to M1 Panther II and M1A1AIM kits are Magic Tracks! But even those were fine tuned to make sure that all ejector pin marks on them are of “proud”, not recessed, type to make them easier to remove without filling holes. I hoped that new tooling tracks with separate end connectors could be included in the kit, but DML decided to re-use older parts.
In the kit you get some bonuses For example included are four newly tooled and quite accurate in shape smoke grenade launchers. For the M1A1 model you of course only need two – other two are a bonus. It was my idea, as I thought these can be used to enhance other models, like DML M1 Panther II (which included nice, but not quite accurate parts) or M60s from other manufacturers. You also get two exhaust deflectors, while only one (if any) is carried on Abrams. Plus more tow shackles than you are likely to use on M1 model.
There are many nice features in the kit, some of them difficult to spot until you start building it. For example there are tiny part numbers and other similar markings on many parts, like jerrycans, fuel filler caps or commander’s cupola and hatch. Many parts have slide molded details added, like rear engine compartment doors, which have louvers details on the bottom (not simplified PE details like Panther II kit). Machine guns are particularly nice with crisp details. M2HB is in my opinion one of the best, if not THE best, injected plastic one ever made in this scale.
The turret number molded on the right side of kit turret part is “7201 U”. “U” stands for depleted uranium armor and all M1A1HC, M1A1AIM and M1A2 turrets have this letter added to turret numbers. And why this exact number?... Well, no reason other than that I was born it January 1972 :-) I wanted the kit to have some sort of my “signature” on it. You may also notice when you get the kit that the number was added on a small insert to the tool (thin raised line is visible around it - easy to remove with sandpaper or sharp blade) - this means that it can be easily changed in other M1 family releases, without the need to retool the turret.
If you have any questions about the kit, I’ll do my best to answer them. In my blog on Dragon’s MDFC website I plan to post more detailed information about the kit and my suggestions to avoid problems during construction.
Pawel
Hosted by Darren Baker
Dragon M1A1AIM - notes from technical advisor
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 06, 2006 - 04:32 PM UTC
Erik67
Buskerud, Norway
Joined: July 31, 2005
KitMaker: 1,871 posts
Armorama: 1,423 posts
Joined: July 31, 2005
KitMaker: 1,871 posts
Armorama: 1,423 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 06, 2006 - 08:29 PM UTC
This is not a problem Pawel, it is a challenge! Btw, does this kit come with grenades for the smoke dischargers?
Erik
Erik
chefchris
North Carolina, United States
Joined: February 06, 2006
KitMaker: 1,544 posts
Armorama: 1,464 posts
Joined: February 06, 2006
KitMaker: 1,544 posts
Armorama: 1,464 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 06, 2006 - 08:36 PM UTC
Pawel, THanks for taking the time to give us the "straight dope" on this kit. I have one on pre-order and I can hardly wait to get it. So for the future releases they SHOULD include the one pc. engine deck, right?
Thanks for the info,
Chris
Thanks for the info,
Chris
USArmy2534
Indiana, United States
Joined: January 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,716 posts
Armorama: 1,864 posts
Joined: January 28, 2004
KitMaker: 2,716 posts
Armorama: 1,864 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 06, 2006 - 08:57 PM UTC
Thanks for the hard work, patience with many modellers, and semi-unbiased info. Do you have a link to the blog?
Jeff
Jeff
corsutton
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: June 17, 2005
KitMaker: 544 posts
Armorama: 511 posts
Joined: June 17, 2005
KitMaker: 544 posts
Armorama: 511 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 06, 2006 - 09:13 PM UTC
Yes Erik there are grenades for the smoke dischargers. You can also open the grenade storage box on the front panels of the turret and put grenades in there as well.
lavgnr
Alberta, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2003
KitMaker: 338 posts
Armorama: 216 posts
Joined: November 03, 2003
KitMaker: 338 posts
Armorama: 216 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 06, 2006 - 09:23 PM UTC
Thanks for the report, Pawel, and I think that's hilarious about the numbers- I'd have done the same thing!
I've got the Panther II in progress right now, so it will be interesting to see just how different the new NEW hull is to that one.
Cheers!
Mike
I've got the Panther II in progress right now, so it will be interesting to see just how different the new NEW hull is to that one.
Cheers!
Mike
Petition2God
Colorado, United States
Joined: February 06, 2002
KitMaker: 1,526 posts
Armorama: 1,294 posts
Joined: February 06, 2002
KitMaker: 1,526 posts
Armorama: 1,294 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 06, 2006 - 10:32 PM UTC
Great info, Pawel! I cannot thank you more for your hard work. And thanks to DML for the release.
SEDimmick
New Jersey, United States
Joined: March 15, 2002
KitMaker: 1,745 posts
Armorama: 1,483 posts
Joined: March 15, 2002
KitMaker: 1,745 posts
Armorama: 1,483 posts
Posted: Sunday, August 06, 2006 - 11:42 PM UTC
Pawel,
You spoke about the tooling and it not being as nice as the say the German releases that DML has done. How does it compare say to the Panther II kit?
You spoke about the tooling and it not being as nice as the say the German releases that DML has done. How does it compare say to the Panther II kit?
EL_Martino
Baden-Württemberg, Germany
Joined: February 27, 2006
KitMaker: 73 posts
Armorama: 63 posts
Joined: February 27, 2006
KitMaker: 73 posts
Armorama: 63 posts
Posted: Monday, August 07, 2006 - 01:14 AM UTC
oooohhhh Pawel,
... at the moment i´m just working on 2 M1A1HA from the Tamiya M1A" OIF version. You talked not bad about DML, but i know that this will be the better Abrams, compared to the Tamyia one... I hope that the tamiya kit is still accourate to the original when DML finally releases their new "baby".
But i´ll do my best to do a nice OIF Diorama, but i think with alot of tears, this should be possible .
I´m impatiently waiting for the new DML one, but i think i can fill the waiting time with Tamiya
cheers !
PS : Maybe you can propose at DML to do some more modern kits, maybe an M88 HERCULES or some other nice vehicles...
... at the moment i´m just working on 2 M1A1HA from the Tamiya M1A" OIF version. You talked not bad about DML, but i know that this will be the better Abrams, compared to the Tamyia one... I hope that the tamiya kit is still accourate to the original when DML finally releases their new "baby".
But i´ll do my best to do a nice OIF Diorama, but i think with alot of tears, this should be possible .
I´m impatiently waiting for the new DML one, but i think i can fill the waiting time with Tamiya
cheers !
PS : Maybe you can propose at DML to do some more modern kits, maybe an M88 HERCULES or some other nice vehicles...
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Monday, August 07, 2006 - 02:00 AM UTC
Quoted Text
This is not a problem Pawel, it is a challenge! Btw, does this kit come with grenades for the smoke dischargers?
Yes, two types - shorter black ones and longer green ones.
Quoted Text
So for the future releases they SHOULD include the one pc. engine deck, right?
I wanted to say that I suggested it to DML, but I can't be sure that they will include such part.
Quoted Text
Do you have a link to the blog?
Blog will be on this website: http://www.dmlforum.com/dmlforum/index.php
To access the site, you must be a member of MDFC and as far as I know it is very painful process to get access there...
Quoted Text
How does it compare say to the Panther II kit?
Molding quality is similar, although some parts are molded a bit worse... For example inside "walls" of sprocket wheels are a bit rought, while they were smooth in Panther II.
Quoted Text
PS : Maybe you can propose at DML to do some more modern kits, maybe an M88 HERCULES or some other nice vehicles...
Trust me, I tried... They are not convinced they can make money on modern kits.
Pawel
P.S. It was pointed out to me that my post can be badly received by other people who also helped in the kit creation. There was several modelers who helped a lot in this project (please take a look here: http://www.dragonmodelsltd.com/catalog/dml/insidestory/3535-inside_story/acknowledgement.shtm). Their help was extrememly important, but with exception of Ralph Zwilling they were not members of DML design team and have not seen any of kit parts yet, so can't provide the same kind of information I provided in this thread. Anyway, the kit wouldn't be the same without the help from those people. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FRIENDS!
pascalbausset
Moselle, France
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 1,416 posts
Armorama: 1,379 posts
Joined: February 05, 2002
KitMaker: 1,416 posts
Armorama: 1,379 posts
Posted: Monday, August 07, 2006 - 06:52 AM UTC
Many thanks.
I' am waiting since many months for this kit.
Its one of my first project in the current months
Hope that DML make new modern kits with the same team who are "specialists" for this.
I' am waiting since many months for this kit.
Its one of my first project in the current months
Hope that DML make new modern kits with the same team who are "specialists" for this.
slynch1701
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 08, 2005
KitMaker: 340 posts
Armorama: 290 posts
Joined: March 08, 2005
KitMaker: 340 posts
Armorama: 290 posts
Posted: Monday, August 07, 2006 - 08:51 PM UTC
Pawel, will you also have the information on what to watch out for from the blog on your personal website?
Thanks,
Sean
Thanks,
Sean
SimonW
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: September 18, 2005
KitMaker: 72 posts
Armorama: 59 posts
Joined: September 18, 2005
KitMaker: 72 posts
Armorama: 59 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 - 12:30 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Trust me, I tried... They are not convinced they can make money on modern kits.
That's not encouraging news. Do you know if Dragon intend to do any more modern kits, or will they stick to WWII?
jlmurc
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 29, 2005
KitMaker: 1,267 posts
Armorama: 969 posts
Joined: August 29, 2005
KitMaker: 1,267 posts
Armorama: 969 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 - 01:14 AM UTC
I look forward to getting my hands on one Pawel, but it is a shame that Dragon have not managed to get a toolmaker that is up to the standard of the most recent releases. I have to say that the quality of the Panzer IVc is an absolute delight and I would recommend it to everybody whether they build German or not. It is the same that it is without a doubt a very complex kit and I really dont know how they manage to pack it in such a compact box.
John
John
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 - 02:06 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Pawel, will you also have the information on what to watch out for from the blog on your personal website?
Possibly. I haven't decided yet.
Quoted Text
Do you know if Dragon intend to do any more modern kits, or will they stick to WWII?
There are some future plans. But not a lot. And I can't say anything more at this point.
Pawel
slynch1701
Illinois, United States
Joined: March 08, 2005
KitMaker: 340 posts
Armorama: 290 posts
Joined: March 08, 2005
KitMaker: 340 posts
Armorama: 290 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 - 06:20 AM UTC
Thanks for your response about posting on your website. I hope you do decide to do so, as the information you give on your website and here is very useful and appreciated. Riight now I am having password rememberance issues with the Dragon site and the double posting would be very well received.
thanks for all your work on this project as well as the other information you provide.
Sean
thanks for all your work on this project as well as the other information you provide.
Sean
lavgnr
Alberta, Canada
Joined: November 03, 2003
KitMaker: 338 posts
Armorama: 216 posts
Joined: November 03, 2003
KitMaker: 338 posts
Armorama: 216 posts
Posted: Wednesday, August 09, 2006 - 07:33 AM UTC
http://www.dragonmodelsltd.com/catalog/dml/insidestory/3535-inside_story/acknowledgement.shtm
There are quite a few familiar names in that report, and it's obvious where Dragon sees it's talent pool. Thanks for working on this kit, all of you.
There are quite a few familiar names in that report, and it's obvious where Dragon sees it's talent pool. Thanks for working on this kit, all of you.