_GOTOBOTTOM
AFV Painting & Weathering
Answers to questions about the right paint scheme or tips for the right effect.
Trumpeter BR52 Etch or just a good paint ?
Adolph
Visit this Community
Nelson, New Zealand
Joined: August 27, 2005
KitMaker: 171 posts
Armorama: 127 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 - 03:33 PM UTC
I am in the process of collecting information to build the Trumpeter BR52 kit hauling a Karl Morser that I have already built , I will probably just finish it in Panzer Grey as many of these engines were painted that colour and give it a good weathering job.

My question is does this kit , which really has a lot of detail out of the box, warrant the cost of the kit again in photoetch to make it a satisfactory end product for the average modeller . Is all that etch detail really notable once a coat of paint goes over it?

While researching the BR52 I found this site and review by an ardent model rail enthusiast that has made me really question whether I will buy the Voyager etch sets that I intended to to dress up this excellent kit.

Opinions would be much appreciated as not all of us can easily afford such a kit and all the aftermarket extras as well.

http://www.ipmsstockholm.org/magazine/2006/06/stuff_eng_benshahar_locomotives.htm

jimbrae
Visit this Community
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 - 03:51 PM UTC
The consensus on the Trumpeter kit is that YES it'll build well out of the box. However, the majority of people are also convinced that it is far too simplified in many areas (cab, some external details etc,). Many people have also arrived at the conclusion that with a model this size, the need for some improvement is vital. Therefore, two options: Scratchbuild the missing details or go for one (or more) of the PE sets available.

If Trumpeter kits have a fault, it's that they are (in many cases) somewhat simplified in detail, however, at the price they are asking that is not necessarily a major criticism....
kevinb120
Visit this Community
Virginia, United States
Joined: May 09, 2006
KitMaker: 1,349 posts
Armorama: 1,267 posts
Posted: Wednesday, October 11, 2006 - 10:08 PM UTC
Great looking build in the article. Also one of the most poorly written ones I have ever read. :-)
jimbrae
Visit this Community
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 12, 2006 - 01:58 PM UTC

Quoted Text

Also one of the most poorly written ones I have ever read



Yep - my brain started 'playing tricks' (author's words, not mine) after the first paragraph and wandered off to make itself a coffee...Jim :-)
Adolph
Visit this Community
Nelson, New Zealand
Joined: August 27, 2005
KitMaker: 171 posts
Armorama: 127 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 12, 2006 - 02:26 PM UTC
Agreed that his building and painting skills far exceed his writing skills.


I think that I will just get the Voyager smoke deflector and tender etch. While the cab interior IS rather sparse in detail, due to the enclosed footplate, once the model is complete not much of the interior can be seen.
I have not found one image on the net of a BR52 with smoke deflectors fitted as depicted in the Trumpeter Kit

The BR52 Kriegslokomotive was indeed an austere machine as built during the war, and would not have been in the red and black livery.
This would be on machines that were used after the end of the war and as the very informative attached article says some of the components orginally left off were retro fitted after 1945 when the Loko was widely used by many European rail company's.
So some care is needed in which era livery you wish to model your loko, especially if it is hauling war hardware

http://www-personal.umich.edu/~khmiska/br52.htm

The point has been made in the current German/Nazi thread that research is half the fun of building a model.
jimbrae
Visit this Community
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / Espaņa
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 12, 2006 - 03:01 PM UTC

Quoted Text

The point has been made in the current German/Nazi thread that research is half the fun of building a model



Yes, agreed, although the web is somewhat limited in many respects. It's got a long way to go to actually replace books.. This comment somewhat confirms my thoughts on the web's limitations:


Quoted Text

I have not found one image on the net of a BR52 with smoke deflectors fitted as depicted in the Trumpeter Kit



Adolph
Visit this Community
Nelson, New Zealand
Joined: August 27, 2005
KitMaker: 171 posts
Armorama: 127 posts
Posted: Thursday, October 12, 2006 - 04:36 PM UTC
Well, books and the web can complement each other Jim.
I have looked at many sites that have images of BR52s, probably more that 200 images. The engines either have no smoke deflectors or the small Witte type, but many of these engines with the Witte smoke deflectors are post war photos.
Do you have any concrete information that the type of deflector depicted in the Trumpeter kit was actually used?

Oh, to get back on the topic of painting, while not BR52s I did find these interesting camoflage paint schemes for German WW2 locos that the more enterprising airbrush user may get some inspiration from when it comes time to paint his/her BR52.
At the price of these miniatures I would say the homework would have been done.

http://www.reynaulds.com/rei/rei_wartrains.asp?item=lngNumericSort

link corrected
 _GOTOTOP