Since zimmerit was applied to 99.9% of the Panther As and for the most part, it was a standard pattern.. Why don't model manufacturers premold the zimmerit onto the model??
I just completed the Italeria(sp) 1/35 Panther A with the zimmerit panels applied and even though they were a little thick, I think the model turned out nice.. I was just wondering WHY don't manufacturers do this???
And, for the sake of the arguement, what if I built my "A"s without zimmerit???? Would I be wrong???? (Do we REALLY know if ALL the Panther As had it?)
#:-)
Hosted by Darren Baker
Silly zimmerit question on Panther ausfA
hworth18
Oklahoma, United States
Joined: January 10, 2003
KitMaker: 426 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: January 10, 2003
KitMaker: 426 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 - 10:02 AM UTC
herberta
Canada
Joined: March 06, 2002
KitMaker: 939 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: March 06, 2002
KitMaker: 939 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 - 10:18 AM UTC
Good question!
First off, the Italeri Panther A has zimmerit sheets included. The kit scales out small if you don't use them (and too big if you do, but not by much!!).
I think the reason there isn't zimm molded on is that for example, DML uses the same hull for the A and D. So they cut expenses, and our cost, by not having to mold two different hulls, turrets etc, one with and without zim. Second, not all zim was the same. Some Panthers have zim applied in one big sheet, with a pattern of little squares. Others have that pattern with diagonal lines scribed through. If you want to depict battle damaged zim it's easier to add zim that try to scrape the plastic.
Finally, it's to drive us crazy!!!!
Actually, doing zim is kind of fun, and I like it better than trying to fiddle with some of the PE evil etc.
Cheers
Andy
First off, the Italeri Panther A has zimmerit sheets included. The kit scales out small if you don't use them (and too big if you do, but not by much!!).
I think the reason there isn't zimm molded on is that for example, DML uses the same hull for the A and D. So they cut expenses, and our cost, by not having to mold two different hulls, turrets etc, one with and without zim. Second, not all zim was the same. Some Panthers have zim applied in one big sheet, with a pattern of little squares. Others have that pattern with diagonal lines scribed through. If you want to depict battle damaged zim it's easier to add zim that try to scrape the plastic.
Finally, it's to drive us crazy!!!!
Actually, doing zim is kind of fun, and I like it better than trying to fiddle with some of the PE evil etc.
Cheers
Andy
tek2
New York, United States
Joined: June 06, 2002
KitMaker: 156 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: June 06, 2002
KitMaker: 156 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 - 11:35 AM UTC
I feel that modeling should be a creative thing. Some things are more challenging if not done for you. You become better at it that way. I'm not saying you have to do it by hand (putty),
they make nice resin sets like (Cavalier) et al, which are really nice.
Just my opinion now!
Happy Modeling
they make nice resin sets like (Cavalier) et al, which are really nice.
Just my opinion now!
Happy Modeling
Rico
United States
Joined: September 13, 2002
KitMaker: 66 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: September 13, 2002
KitMaker: 66 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 18, 2003 - 01:44 PM UTC
I imagine it must have something to do with the molding process. If you put surface detail over the whole surface of a panel, and the panel has complex curves and detail on the back, sides, etc., it might not be possible do design a mold that could make it. Or else it would be really expensive.
Also, I think a lot of people who just build models for fun and don't care about accuracy might wonder what that goofy-looking stuff is. I remember when I bought my first Tiger I didn't want one with that "ugly stuff" all over it, I wanted nice clean steel
Also, I think a lot of people who just build models for fun and don't care about accuracy might wonder what that goofy-looking stuff is. I remember when I bought my first Tiger I didn't want one with that "ugly stuff" all over it, I wanted nice clean steel
csch
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Joined: December 27, 2002
KitMaker: 1,941 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: December 27, 2002
KitMaker: 1,941 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 - 08:14 AM UTC
Not all the Panthers A have had zimmeritt. I saw photographs of WW2 whith A´s without zimmeritt. If i´m not rong there is a photograph of one of them in the Ardennes in 1944-45 in "Panzer Colours".
Grifter
North Carolina, United States
Joined: November 17, 2002
KitMaker: 608 posts
Armorama: 425 posts
Joined: November 17, 2002
KitMaker: 608 posts
Armorama: 425 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 - 11:30 AM UTC
Hey the way I see it if you want your A to be zimm-less, then so be it. That's part of the artistic license of modeling for me. Another thought about molded on zimm.....when you clean up/ putty seams/ sand edges, the zimm would be destroyed, forcing you to rebuilt it.
GSPatton
California, United States
Joined: September 04, 2002
KitMaker: 1,411 posts
Armorama: 609 posts
Joined: September 04, 2002
KitMaker: 1,411 posts
Armorama: 609 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 - 11:35 AM UTC
Pre-cast zimmerit is often heavy handed and makes weathering difficult. Using real putty you can recreate battle damage fairly easily. So thats why more manufacturers don't cast their German tank with it.