
Yeah, I know, people need to communicate better. my goal in this is to:
1. Offer praise for a well done job. The build really has been done nice. No reflection on the builder that the model itself is poor, atoplu did good work. But I know what gary is getting at.
2. To offer insight into making the kit BETTER, or at least understanding its shortcomings. many modellers build their kits the way they do because they want to do something different but do not know, for example, that the T-62 turret is severly misshaped. I want to encourage people to look just a little beyond the box and maybe make a change her or there, helping encourage them to expand their model building skills.
But gently, or at least I try to. Just because the kit is a dog does not mean the builder should be berated for it if they do not want to put in all the work to make it more accurate. First, concentrate on the build/paint aspect. We all fall into this category. Then cover the accuracy/bolt counting issue. Or, as I say, not everyone who buys a car wants to know how to rebuild the engine.

end -
Again, nice work. I hope to have my T-62M m2005 progress updated soon.