G'day fellas,
Just beginning to add finishing touches to my M1 and wanted to know what the briding weight of an M1 with plow would be?
Thanks guys
Stew
Hosted by Darren Baker
What's an M1A1 with Plow's bridging weight?

Stewy44

Joined: January 10, 2007
KitMaker: 32 posts
Armorama: 31 posts

Posted: Saturday, February 10, 2007 - 07:33 AM UTC

turrettoad13

Joined: February 26, 2003
KitMaker: 607 posts
Armorama: 490 posts

Posted: Saturday, February 10, 2007 - 09:23 PM UTC
Mine plow specs.
M1 Mine Clearing Blade System
Primary function: To effectively counteract and neutralize all land mines.
Manufacturer: Israel Military Industries
M1A1 MINE CLEARING BLADE SYSTEM
Weight: 4.5 tons (4.08 metric tons)
Length: 9.6 feet (2.92 meters)
Width: 14.9 feet (4.54 meters)
Height: 2.5 feet (2.29 meters)
Square: 143 square feet (13.30 square meters)
Cube: 346 cubic feet (10.38 cubic meters)
just add 4.5 tons to the loaded weight
M1 Mine Clearing Blade System
Primary function: To effectively counteract and neutralize all land mines.
Manufacturer: Israel Military Industries
M1A1 MINE CLEARING BLADE SYSTEM
Weight: 4.5 tons (4.08 metric tons)
Length: 9.6 feet (2.92 meters)
Width: 14.9 feet (4.54 meters)
Height: 2.5 feet (2.29 meters)
Square: 143 square feet (13.30 square meters)
Cube: 346 cubic feet (10.38 cubic meters)
just add 4.5 tons to the loaded weight

HeavyArty


Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts

Posted: Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 12:03 AM UTC
If you are looking for the bridge classification weight to put on the front hull, it would still be 68 tons. The classification weight is only for the tank. Since the plow can be added to any tank, the stenciled weight doesn't change.

Stewy44

Joined: January 10, 2007
KitMaker: 32 posts
Armorama: 31 posts

Posted: Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 04:39 AM UTC
Thanks for the replies fellas,
Would an increased weight be inforamally 'chalked' onto the front of the tank for bridging ops - say 73 or 74 tonnes - or is that unrealistic?
Cheers
Stew
Would an increased weight be inforamally 'chalked' onto the front of the tank for bridging ops - say 73 or 74 tonnes - or is that unrealistic?
Cheers
Stew

Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts

Posted: Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 04:43 AM UTC
The tank wouldn't be taken across a bridge that couldn't handle the weight and then some. Why would the combined weight need to be marked? The crew would know what the weight was and would not cross a bridge that couldn't handle it.

sarge18

Joined: November 09, 2002
KitMaker: 272 posts
Armorama: 267 posts

Posted: Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 08:03 AM UTC
As well, you wouldn't modify the existing bridging marks. The 70 (or 68, depending on chassis) would be marked there, with no chalking modfications.
Like Sabot said, the crew knows, or should, and if the crew didn't, someone screwed up in promoting that tank commander.
Jed
Like Sabot said, the crew knows, or should, and if the crew didn't, someone screwed up in promoting that tank commander.
Jed

Stewy44

Joined: January 10, 2007
KitMaker: 32 posts
Armorama: 31 posts

Posted: Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 12:09 PM UTC
Ok, thanks fellas for your assistance
Stew
Stew

![]() |