_GOTOBOTTOM
Armor/AFV: Modern Armor
Modern armor in general.
Hosted by Darren Baker
What's an M1A1 with Plow's bridging weight?
Stewy44
Visit this Community
Queensland, Australia
Joined: January 10, 2007
KitMaker: 32 posts
Armorama: 31 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 10, 2007 - 07:33 AM UTC
G'day fellas,

Just beginning to add finishing touches to my M1 and wanted to know what the briding weight of an M1 with plow would be?

Thanks guys
Stew

turrettoad13
Visit this Community
Mississippi, United States
Joined: February 26, 2003
KitMaker: 607 posts
Armorama: 490 posts
Posted: Saturday, February 10, 2007 - 09:23 PM UTC
Mine plow specs.
M1 Mine Clearing Blade System
Primary function: To effectively counteract and neutralize all land mines.
Manufacturer: Israel Military Industries

M1A1 MINE CLEARING BLADE SYSTEM
Weight: 4.5 tons (4.08 metric tons)
Length: 9.6 feet (2.92 meters)
Width: 14.9 feet (4.54 meters)
Height: 2.5 feet (2.29 meters)
Square: 143 square feet (13.30 square meters)
Cube: 346 cubic feet (10.38 cubic meters)

just add 4.5 tons to the loaded weight
HeavyArty
Visit this Community
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 12:03 AM UTC
If you are looking for the bridge classification weight to put on the front hull, it would still be 68 tons. The classification weight is only for the tank. Since the plow can be added to any tank, the stenciled weight doesn't change.
Stewy44
Visit this Community
Queensland, Australia
Joined: January 10, 2007
KitMaker: 32 posts
Armorama: 31 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 04:39 AM UTC
Thanks for the replies fellas,

Would an increased weight be inforamally 'chalked' onto the front of the tank for bridging ops - say 73 or 74 tonnes - or is that unrealistic?

Cheers
Stew
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 04:43 AM UTC
The tank wouldn't be taken across a bridge that couldn't handle the weight and then some. Why would the combined weight need to be marked? The crew would know what the weight was and would not cross a bridge that couldn't handle it.
sarge18
Visit this Community
Kentucky, United States
Joined: November 09, 2002
KitMaker: 272 posts
Armorama: 267 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 08:03 AM UTC
As well, you wouldn't modify the existing bridging marks. The 70 (or 68, depending on chassis) would be marked there, with no chalking modfications.

Like Sabot said, the crew knows, or should, and if the crew didn't, someone screwed up in promoting that tank commander.

Jed
Stewy44
Visit this Community
Queensland, Australia
Joined: January 10, 2007
KitMaker: 32 posts
Armorama: 31 posts
Posted: Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 12:09 PM UTC
Ok, thanks fellas for your assistance

Stew
 _GOTOTOP