DML have just announced (and provided us with the images), two unexpected 1/35th scale releases. In this photo report, we offer a FULL image preview of two unusual subjecyts - the Sd. Kfz 251/17 (Luftwaffe) and the 7.5cm Stu.Kan.on the 38(t) chassis. The report can be seen:
Link to Item
If you have comments or questions please post them here.
Thanks!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
NEWS
DML - Surprise 1/35 Armor Releasesjimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / España
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 02:33 PM UTC
Jamesite
United Kingdom
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Joined: December 05, 2006
KitMaker: 2,208 posts
Armorama: 2,152 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 06:06 PM UTC
Dragon continue to impress........
trahe
Virginia, United States
Joined: April 03, 2006
KitMaker: 1,158 posts
Armorama: 950 posts
Joined: April 03, 2006
KitMaker: 1,158 posts
Armorama: 950 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 06:09 PM UTC
Jim,
Thanks for the heads up.
Thanks for the heads up.
mark197205
England - East Midlands, United Kingdom
Joined: November 10, 2003
KitMaker: 1,593 posts
Armorama: 1,465 posts
Joined: November 10, 2003
KitMaker: 1,593 posts
Armorama: 1,465 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 06:44 PM UTC
Thanks Jim for the news, it seems that Dragon still isnt going to let AFV Club release any 251 variant without going head to head with one of their own, and the 38t version is another interesting looking release, one that has possible more limited appeal so is ideal for the limited run Cyber-Hobby treatment.
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 06:47 PM UTC
WOW, GREAT NEWS!!!! More German stuff!!!!! I can't wait for the nest Tiger Aug X with added widgets to come out next!!!
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / España
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 06:51 PM UTC
Quoted Text
WOW, GREAT NEWS!!!! More German stuff!!!!! I can't wait for the nest Tiger Aug X with added widgets to come out next!!!
Now, now Gino :-) :-) :-) :-)
RichardM
Quebec, Canada
Joined: August 13, 2006
KitMaker: 383 posts
Armorama: 358 posts
Joined: August 13, 2006
KitMaker: 383 posts
Armorama: 358 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 07:02 PM UTC
Hehe that explain why Dragon's master blogger Hero-Sandwich was going after Terry and his review of the AFV Club 251/17 a few days ago :-) :-)
Alpenflage
Massachusetts, United States
Joined: May 21, 2003
KitMaker: 1,120 posts
Armorama: 1,002 posts
Joined: May 21, 2003
KitMaker: 1,120 posts
Armorama: 1,002 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 07:34 PM UTC
Some good news on the last day of February, Jim. Interesting indeed
Well, onto do some pre-orders and to carry out the plan of the day
Cheers !!
Robert
Well, onto do some pre-orders and to carry out the plan of the day
Cheers !!
Robert
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 08:15 PM UTC
Great news. Dragon continues to deliver. Cannot ever have too much German WWII stuff. Sorry Gino :-) :-)
I have never heard about the 7.5cm Stu.Kan.auf Pz.Kpfw.38(t) before. Was this a production vehicle, field modification, or just a prototype?
I have never heard about the 7.5cm Stu.Kan.auf Pz.Kpfw.38(t) before. Was this a production vehicle, field modification, or just a prototype?
markm
California, United States
Joined: September 11, 2005
KitMaker: 1,757 posts
Armorama: 1,148 posts
Joined: September 11, 2005
KitMaker: 1,757 posts
Armorama: 1,148 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 08:24 PM UTC
Jim, I may have missed it but what kind of tracks does the 251 have? It looks great anyway but just curious after my failed attempt to build some of the earlier ones.
fatbobit
Tokyo-to, Japan / 日本
Joined: April 14, 2006
KitMaker: 164 posts
Armorama: 135 posts
Joined: April 14, 2006
KitMaker: 164 posts
Armorama: 135 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 08:37 PM UTC
Hi Jim thanks for the update, im really impressed by the 251. Do you think this beauty is allready available in Europe..? And if it is..., where can i buy it or just pre-order..? I want it as my first 251..!!
Thanks again Jim. You made my day..!
Ciao
Alex.
Thanks again Jim. You made my day..!
Ciao
Alex.
jimbrae
Provincia de Lugo, Spain / España
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Joined: April 23, 2003
KitMaker: 12,927 posts
Armorama: 9,486 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 08:39 PM UTC
@ Alessandro - it isn't available ANYWHERE yet
@ Mark - Standard 'Magic Tracks' I would imagine
@ Mark - Standard 'Magic Tracks' I would imagine
Kinggeorges
Barcelona, Spain / España
Joined: August 31, 2005
KitMaker: 1,380 posts
Armorama: 845 posts
Joined: August 31, 2005
KitMaker: 1,380 posts
Armorama: 845 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 08:42 PM UTC
I'll second Gino comment !
I Don't understand why makers prefer produce an obscur german tank produced maybe in ten exemplary rather than a nice comon allied vehicule.. and don't tell me it will sell more...I understand for a Tiger, not for an obscur version nobody heard of...
Anyway it's like "pisser contre le vent" in French.
Best to all,
Julien
I Don't understand why makers prefer produce an obscur german tank produced maybe in ten exemplary rather than a nice comon allied vehicule.. and don't tell me it will sell more...I understand for a Tiger, not for an obscur version nobody heard of...
Anyway it's like "pisser contre le vent" in French.
Best to all,
Julien
markm
California, United States
Joined: September 11, 2005
KitMaker: 1,757 posts
Armorama: 1,148 posts
Joined: September 11, 2005
KitMaker: 1,757 posts
Armorama: 1,148 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 08:42 PM UTC
That would be good, I have not tried a 251 with magic tracks yet
Thanks
Thanks
davsam28
Indiana, United States
Joined: July 19, 2006
KitMaker: 95 posts
Armorama: 92 posts
Joined: July 19, 2006
KitMaker: 95 posts
Armorama: 92 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 09:04 PM UTC
look its another german vehicle!!! who would have thought? now where is the stryker again???? :-)
HansBolter
Florida, United States
Joined: September 27, 2006
KitMaker: 42 posts
Armorama: 38 posts
Joined: September 27, 2006
KitMaker: 42 posts
Armorama: 38 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 09:20 PM UTC
Last weekend I picked up Dragon's kit of the 251/C Flamethrower version......not sure of the correct designation number as I am not where I can put my hands on the kit.
The kit is absolutely jaw dropping.
The kit is absolutely jaw dropping.
james84
Roma, Italy
Joined: January 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,368 posts
Armorama: 950 posts
Joined: January 28, 2006
KitMaker: 1,368 posts
Armorama: 950 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 09:26 PM UTC
As for the AA gun, it seems to be a clear sign of a will to compete with AFV club in this sctor... who will win?
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 09:28 PM UTC
251/17... Jeeeeezzzz... I hoped that they will let AFV Club to have at least this one for themselves I must say that it is really ridiculous...
But at least it looks like the finally corrected at least some of problems with their 251 series. Sprockets seem to have rollers now and road wheels are also improved. But I'm pretty sure that hull dimensions are still a bit off. Although they included practically entire new upper hull here, so who knows?...
EDIT: Well, I looked more carefully at sprocket pics and compared them to parts in older kit, and it looks that the are the same - still no rollers and teeth are still symmetrically placed. In fact I don't know what they improved in sprockets, as they look identical to old parts to me...
EDIT 2: DOH!!!... I just checked posters for some previous 251 releases on DML website and some of them already included exatly the same bit about "improved sprockets and road whees"... So I guess you can forget about what I wrote above - no problems corrected. Now this is ridiculous!!!
Pawel
But at least it looks like the finally corrected at least some of problems with their 251 series. Sprockets seem to have rollers now and road wheels are also improved. But I'm pretty sure that hull dimensions are still a bit off. Although they included practically entire new upper hull here, so who knows?...
EDIT: Well, I looked more carefully at sprocket pics and compared them to parts in older kit, and it looks that the are the same - still no rollers and teeth are still symmetrically placed. In fact I don't know what they improved in sprockets, as they look identical to old parts to me...
EDIT 2: DOH!!!... I just checked posters for some previous 251 releases on DML website and some of them already included exatly the same bit about "improved sprockets and road whees"... So I guess you can forget about what I wrote above - no problems corrected. Now this is ridiculous!!!
Pawel
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 09:53 PM UTC
Quoted Text
As for the AA gun, it seems to be a clear sign of a will to compete with AFV club in this sctor... who will win?
Outcome will be probably the same as always with their 251 kits: if you want accuracy get AFV Club. If you want easier assembly and lots of extras in the box, get Dragon.
Pawel
mikeo
Pennsylvania, United States
Joined: April 12, 2006
KitMaker: 325 posts
Armorama: 323 posts
Joined: April 12, 2006
KitMaker: 325 posts
Armorama: 323 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 10:11 PM UTC
Quoted Text
WOW, GREAT NEWS!!!! More German stuff!!!!! I can't wait for the nest Tiger Aug X with added widgets to come out next!!!
You took the words out of my mouth Gino!
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 10:13 PM UTC
Pawel,
Spoken like a true Dragon technical advisor.
I dare anyone to say you are biased. :-)
Thanks for the feedback. I think it's always important to say that while there has never been a perfect kit, it's always nice to strive for the best.
Cheers,
Jim
Spoken like a true Dragon technical advisor.
I dare anyone to say you are biased. :-)
Thanks for the feedback. I think it's always important to say that while there has never been a perfect kit, it's always nice to strive for the best.
Cheers,
Jim
Vodnik
Warszawa, Poland
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Joined: March 26, 2003
KitMaker: 4,342 posts
Armorama: 3,938 posts
Posted: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 - 10:48 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Spoken like a true Dragon technical advisor.
:-)
Of course there is still hope that I'm wrong and they did correct something and it's just not shown on the poster. They certainly know what should be corrected, as they got the detailed reference information from many sources (including myself in this case, even though I usually don't touch their WW2 German kits - I mean from kit design perspective, as I do build them from time to time ).
Pawel
wbill76
Texas, United States
Joined: May 02, 2006
KitMaker: 5,425 posts
Armorama: 4,659 posts
Joined: May 02, 2006
KitMaker: 5,425 posts
Armorama: 4,659 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 12:51 AM UTC
The 251/17 is interesting, look forward to seeing how it compares side-by-side with the AFV kit. I wasn't too impressed with the Tristar Flak 38 vs. the DML Flak 38...but the AFV Flak 38 is supposed to offer finer detail so that may tip the balance on that score.
As for the StuK 38(t), that thing looks so bizarre that I'll be very likely to get it. I love the CH approach to providing the odder vehicles and I wondered if they might not use the Pz 38t G chassis as a foundation for some boutique kits. I know zero about it, but it doesn't look like anything that ever went into combat but has an intriguing concept in the marriage of the StuG long 7.5cm with the 38(t) chassis.
As for the StuK 38(t), that thing looks so bizarre that I'll be very likely to get it. I love the CH approach to providing the odder vehicles and I wondered if they might not use the Pz 38t G chassis as a foundation for some boutique kits. I know zero about it, but it doesn't look like anything that ever went into combat but has an intriguing concept in the marriage of the StuG long 7.5cm with the 38(t) chassis.
kevinb120
Virginia, United States
Joined: May 09, 2006
KitMaker: 1,349 posts
Armorama: 1,267 posts
Joined: May 09, 2006
KitMaker: 1,349 posts
Armorama: 1,267 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 01:50 AM UTC
I wish CH would do at least one allied model, like a Calliope or something
blaster76
Texas, United States
Joined: September 15, 2002
KitMaker: 8,985 posts
Armorama: 3,034 posts
Joined: September 15, 2002
KitMaker: 8,985 posts
Armorama: 3,034 posts
Posted: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 - 10:56 AM UTC
Are we still waiting on that UHU? Keep releasing the same kit s someone else and not one really cool looking one that no one has done yet. Of course It is likely that I missed the notice of release, but I haven't seen one yet?