Яusso-Soviэt Forum: Cold War Soviet Armor
For discussions related to cold war era Russo-Soviet armor.
For discussions related to cold war era Russo-Soviet armor.
Hosted by Jacques Duquette
T-55 Enigma Build
Removed by original poster on 03/10/07 - 03:21:29 (GMT).
RichardM
Quebec, Canada
Joined: August 13, 2006
KitMaker: 383 posts
Armorama: 358 posts
Joined: August 13, 2006
KitMaker: 383 posts
Armorama: 358 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 08, 2007 - 05:10 AM UTC
Sorry for the stoopid question but are you sure you had to remove the fenders? The beam supports are supposed to be welded/bolted to the hull and top fender. At least that's what the pictures of the real thing seems to imply. The thin resin wall you see between the beams looks more like regular flash you see on that kind of resin moulding.
I will follow that built quite closely as I want to built one myself. But I will use the very cheap way: Trumpeter T-55 with Enigma scratchuilded parts
I will follow that built quite closely as I want to built one myself. But I will use the very cheap way: Trumpeter T-55 with Enigma scratchuilded parts
junglejim
Alberta, Canada
Joined: February 18, 2003
KitMaker: 1,728 posts
Armorama: 1,629 posts
Joined: February 18, 2003
KitMaker: 1,728 posts
Armorama: 1,629 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 08, 2007 - 05:29 AM UTC
Ah, the joy of resin and their associated instructions...
Here's some pics of the beast, if you haven't seen 'em yet:
http://www.primeportal.net/tanks/adam_vukich/t-55_enigma_walk.htm
I've got some of the Bovington one - I could put 'em up somewhere I suppose.
Yep, looks like flash on those parts, gave yerself a little extra work I think!
Jim
Here's some pics of the beast, if you haven't seen 'em yet:
http://www.primeportal.net/tanks/adam_vukich/t-55_enigma_walk.htm
I've got some of the Bovington one - I could put 'em up somewhere I suppose.
Yep, looks like flash on those parts, gave yerself a little extra work I think!
Jim
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 08, 2007 - 05:36 AM UTC
Sorry, but I agree. The rails are supposed to sit on top of the fenders, not replace them. The thin areas are flash that should be removed from the rails before installing them on top of the fenders.
jlmurc
England - East Anglia, United Kingdom
Joined: August 29, 2005
KitMaker: 1,267 posts
Armorama: 969 posts
Joined: August 29, 2005
KitMaker: 1,267 posts
Armorama: 969 posts
Posted: Thursday, March 08, 2007 - 06:33 AM UTC
Ian,
Quick grab the fender slices that you bave removed and if possible re-attach them as they are required, before you remove the flash from the support beams.
If the instructions were written in a clearer fashion they would not cause people to damage expensive models. I am afraid that I have had the experience that sometimes, these specialist conversions have a steep learning curve and can trip you up.
John
Quick grab the fender slices that you bave removed and if possible re-attach them as they are required, before you remove the flash from the support beams.
If the instructions were written in a clearer fashion they would not cause people to damage expensive models. I am afraid that I have had the experience that sometimes, these specialist conversions have a steep learning curve and can trip you up.
John
Removed by original poster on 03/10/07 - 03:21:58 (GMT).
junglejim
Alberta, Canada
Joined: February 18, 2003
KitMaker: 1,728 posts
Armorama: 1,629 posts
Joined: February 18, 2003
KitMaker: 1,728 posts
Armorama: 1,629 posts
Posted: Friday, March 09, 2007 - 04:14 AM UTC
Mmmph,mmmph. Oops, sorry, just taking my foot out of my mouth
Looks like you did what they said, just surprised at how thin the new 'fender' is, some serious mold expansion for a relatively new conversion. Guess it'll be easy to show some damage to them...
Jim
Looks like you did what they said, just surprised at how thin the new 'fender' is, some serious mold expansion for a relatively new conversion. Guess it'll be easy to show some damage to them...
Jim
HeavyArty
Florida, United States
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Joined: May 16, 2002
KitMaker: 17,694 posts
Armorama: 13,742 posts
Posted: Friday, March 09, 2007 - 05:00 AM UTC
Sorry too. I guess you did what they said, but it still doesn't look right. Good luck on it.
RichardM
Quebec, Canada
Joined: August 13, 2006
KitMaker: 383 posts
Armorama: 358 posts
Joined: August 13, 2006
KitMaker: 383 posts
Armorama: 358 posts
Posted: Friday, March 09, 2007 - 06:12 AM UTC
And a third guy remove the foot from his mouth :-)
Still find it very strange that you have to remove the fenders Anyway will still follow the thread carefully
Still find it very strange that you have to remove the fenders Anyway will still follow the thread carefully
Posted: Friday, March 09, 2007 - 05:54 PM UTC
hey, I would call it 50/50 on the goof....
I realised last night I had messed up and cut too much out of the fenders anyway, I originally thought the outer metal was inside so cut to that length (hence the gap). I guess thats what happens when you start working on it at 11pm after just noticing your car has been broken into and your laptop nicked . Now sorted, so it currently looks like this: (bit more work with the filler to do obviously):
Ian
I realised last night I had messed up and cut too much out of the fenders anyway, I originally thought the outer metal was inside so cut to that length (hence the gap). I guess thats what happens when you start working on it at 11pm after just noticing your car has been broken into and your laptop nicked . Now sorted, so it currently looks like this: (bit more work with the filler to do obviously):
Ian