I have to admit I have been quite smitten by the work of Steve Zaloga. Here is a pic of his latest posting on ML. http://www.missing-lynx.com/gallery/usa/szt28-6.jpg
My question is....what are those guns? 5Ocal gattling guns? Also...and this has been bugging me since I was 10. What does the roller on the front of the half-track do? I am guessing it helps the vehicle climb steep embankments or something.
Cheers,
Jim
PS: And Steve...if you read this. Great work as usual!
Armor/AFV
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
For discussions on tanks, artillery, jeeps, etc.
Hosted by Darren Baker, Mario Matijasic
Steve Zaloga's Latest
Posted: Monday, April 01, 2002 - 01:02 PM UTC
m1garand
Washington, United States
Joined: February 08, 2002
KitMaker: 1,248 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: February 08, 2002
KitMaker: 1,248 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, April 01, 2002 - 01:16 PM UTC
Quoted Text
My question is....what are those guns? 5Ocal gattling guns?
They look like .50 cal watercooled guns IMHO. Just looking at the other pics in that gallery.
Posted: Monday, April 01, 2002 - 01:23 PM UTC
BC,
Very likely. What is the other long tube protruding I wonder.
Jim
Very likely. What is the other long tube protruding I wonder.
Jim
powen
Canada
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 27 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 27 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, April 01, 2002 - 01:23 PM UTC
Here is a model of Steve's from my site:
Oh my!!! I can't pirate images from track-link!!!
All in fun ;-)
Oh my!!! I can't pirate images from track-link!!!
All in fun ;-)
Posted: Monday, April 01, 2002 - 01:45 PM UTC
Paul,
Lol...I was just thinking you could do a lot worse that feed them that image.
I just noted that Steve's image is really bloated at 109kb. I just ran it through PS and it could easily go down to 60kb with no quality lost. FYI I am shrinking it a tad. It's 850 pixels wide in reality. Oh well.
Jim
Lol...I was just thinking you could do a lot worse that feed them that image.
I just noted that Steve's image is really bloated at 109kb. I just ran it through PS and it could easily go down to 60kb with no quality lost. FYI I am shrinking it a tad. It's 850 pixels wide in reality. Oh well.
Jim
CaptainJack
Luxembourg, Belgium
Joined: March 17, 2002
KitMaker: 793 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: March 17, 2002
KitMaker: 793 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, April 01, 2002 - 03:00 PM UTC
Hi jim those babies look like 20mm Oraklien guns, a common IDF conversion.
Jack
Jack
CaptainJack
Luxembourg, Belgium
Joined: March 17, 2002
KitMaker: 793 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: March 17, 2002
KitMaker: 793 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, April 01, 2002 - 03:02 PM UTC
Sorry, boy am I dumb!! I didn't notice the ammo cans. Yeah, they are probably 30 cal water cooled machine guns. Istand corrected. Even if it is by myself.
Jack
Jack
m1garand
Washington, United States
Joined: February 08, 2002
KitMaker: 1,248 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: February 08, 2002
KitMaker: 1,248 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, April 01, 2002 - 09:15 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Sorry, boy am I dumb!! I didn't notice the ammo cans. Yeah, they are probably 30 cal water cooled machine guns. Istand corrected. Even if it is by myself.
Jack
I believe they are .50 cal ammo cans.
m60a3
Georgia, United States
Joined: March 08, 2002
KitMaker: 778 posts
Armorama: 396 posts
Joined: March 08, 2002
KitMaker: 778 posts
Armorama: 396 posts
Posted: Monday, April 01, 2002 - 09:27 PM UTC
Quoted Text
What does the roller on the front of the half-track do? I am guessing it helps the vehicle climb steep embankments or something.
The front roller was designed as an anti-ditching device...remember, the memories of the trenches of the Great War was burned deeply into everyone's memory. As the vehicle reached a trench, the front roller would prevent the front fender from getting burrowed in.
herberta
Canada
Joined: March 06, 2002
KitMaker: 939 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: March 06, 2002
KitMaker: 939 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, April 01, 2002 - 09:38 PM UTC
Quoted Text
The front roller was designed as an anti-ditching device...remember, the memories of the trenches of the Great War was burned deeply into everyone's memory. As the vehicle reached a trench, the front roller would prevent the front fender from getting burrowed in.
It's amazing how that influenced Allied vehicle designers so much, but not the Germans! Talk about a different philosophy! The Churchill is such an obvious extension of the old Rhomboid tanks, with the howitzer mounted in the bow and all tracks from the sides. Of course they could climb anything...
I've seen lots of photos of prototype US and British vehicles with all kinds of extras to avoid getting stuck in trenches. Weren't some French armored cars equipped with small extra wheels at the front and back for that?
Andy
CaptainJack
Luxembourg, Belgium
Joined: March 17, 2002
KitMaker: 793 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: March 17, 2002
KitMaker: 793 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Monday, April 01, 2002 - 10:03 PM UTC
Eryups,
.050 Cal Now I stand corrected by M1, But then again with a handle like M1 Garand........know the firing end. Chock it up to a fuzzy image. Well The French vehicle I can think of with the extra wheel was the Laffly.
Jack
.050 Cal Now I stand corrected by M1, But then again with a handle like M1 Garand........know the firing end. Chock it up to a fuzzy image. Well The French vehicle I can think of with the extra wheel was the Laffly.
Jack
TreadHead
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 12, 2002
KitMaker: 5,000 posts
Armorama: 2,868 posts
Joined: January 12, 2002
KitMaker: 5,000 posts
Armorama: 2,868 posts
Posted: Monday, April 01, 2002 - 10:26 PM UTC
I have also been a fan of his Jim. His models have a nice touch of 'reality' to them. Does he have a book out on his techniques??
Another fav of mine is Chris Mrosko. He does great stuff, but is a little to linked to Tamiya products I feel. But then of course he's probably sponsored in part by the big 'T' ! In fact, the Chris Mrosko book is where I fine tuned my 'painting in reverse' method of winter whitewashes on my german steel.
Tread.
Since you kinda brought up this subject in a roundabout way. Have you ever thought about inviting one of these guys (master craft painters) to our Friday night chat sessions? I wouldn't think they'd have anything against it, and I'm also sure they would enjoy the heaps of praise that I'm sure we'd ALL be bestowing on them...... Whadaya think??
Another fav of mine is Chris Mrosko. He does great stuff, but is a little to linked to Tamiya products I feel. But then of course he's probably sponsored in part by the big 'T' ! In fact, the Chris Mrosko book is where I fine tuned my 'painting in reverse' method of winter whitewashes on my german steel.
Tread.
Since you kinda brought up this subject in a roundabout way. Have you ever thought about inviting one of these guys (master craft painters) to our Friday night chat sessions? I wouldn't think they'd have anything against it, and I'm also sure they would enjoy the heaps of praise that I'm sure we'd ALL be bestowing on them...... Whadaya think??
TreadHead
Colorado, United States
Joined: January 12, 2002
KitMaker: 5,000 posts
Armorama: 2,868 posts
Joined: January 12, 2002
KitMaker: 5,000 posts
Armorama: 2,868 posts
Posted: Monday, April 01, 2002 - 10:29 PM UTC
Quoted Text
Here is a model of Steve's from my site:
Oh my!!! I can't pirate images from track-link!!!
All in fun ;-)
clap,clap,clap,clap,clap....................there, happy?
m60a3
Georgia, United States
Joined: March 08, 2002
KitMaker: 778 posts
Armorama: 396 posts
Joined: March 08, 2002
KitMaker: 778 posts
Armorama: 396 posts
Posted: Monday, April 01, 2002 - 10:48 PM UTC
Quoted Text
It's amazing how that influenced Allied vehicle designers so much, but not the Germans! Talk about a different philosophy! The Churchill is such an obvious extension of the old Rhomboid tanks, with the howitzer mounted in the bow and all tracks from the sides. Of course they could climb anything...
You are right about the differences in philosophy...the forward-thinking British and US tank proponents and designers were muffled out by the "well, that's not how we won the last war" crowd. The German armor proponents went forward and not only designed faster tanks, but created tactics that fed off the technology.
Sabot
Joined: December 18, 2001
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
KitMaker: 12,596 posts
Armorama: 9,071 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 - 12:34 AM UTC
Quoted Text
Jack, I believe you are right. They look like 20mm Oerlikons, these were primarily shipboard light AA guns. Those cans are the ammo cans and not water cans. That one long barrel is probably a .50 cal used for ranging.Hi jim those babies look like 20mm Oraklien guns, a common IDF conversion.
Posted: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 - 12:48 AM UTC
:::buzz::: And the correct answer is....
The vehicle depicted is the T28E1.
This info is listed on the TANKS Web site.
T28, T28E1, M15, M15A1
This halftrack was armed with twin .50 cal MGs and a 37mm cannon.
Steve also wrote a book that had this model. link
More info. The vehicle was used in Korea also.
76th AAA used leftover WWII halftracks to fight. Jack R. Hayne, Capt, USA (Ret). of the 76th AAA in 1950-1951 is quoted as saying, "You must realize that we had the Quad 50s and 40mm guns mounted on ancient half-tracks that dated back to the WWII invasion of Leyte and Mindanao."
According to John W. Colburn of the 76th AAA in 1952-1953, the weapon shown is an early Multiple Gun Motor Carriage T28E1 with a 37mm automatic cannon and two water-cooled cal. .50 machine guns mounted beside and above the cannon and no armored shield around the gun. This was used in North Africa during the early days of WWII. When the armored shield was installed, the weapon was adopted as standard and designated as the Multiple Gun Motor Carriage M15. Later in WWII changes were made, most notably the water-cooled machine guns were replaced with heavy barreled air-cooled guns which were mounted slightly below and on either side of the cannon, and designated as the M15A1.
From this site: http://kalanio.tripod.com/Howitwasa1b1x.html
Ahh....isn't our hobby facinating. :-)
Jim
The vehicle depicted is the T28E1.
This info is listed on the TANKS Web site.
T28, T28E1, M15, M15A1
This halftrack was armed with twin .50 cal MGs and a 37mm cannon.
Steve also wrote a book that had this model. link
More info. The vehicle was used in Korea also.
76th AAA used leftover WWII halftracks to fight. Jack R. Hayne, Capt, USA (Ret). of the 76th AAA in 1950-1951 is quoted as saying, "You must realize that we had the Quad 50s and 40mm guns mounted on ancient half-tracks that dated back to the WWII invasion of Leyte and Mindanao."
According to John W. Colburn of the 76th AAA in 1952-1953, the weapon shown is an early Multiple Gun Motor Carriage T28E1 with a 37mm automatic cannon and two water-cooled cal. .50 machine guns mounted beside and above the cannon and no armored shield around the gun. This was used in North Africa during the early days of WWII. When the armored shield was installed, the weapon was adopted as standard and designated as the Multiple Gun Motor Carriage M15. Later in WWII changes were made, most notably the water-cooled machine guns were replaced with heavy barreled air-cooled guns which were mounted slightly below and on either side of the cannon, and designated as the M15A1.
From this site: http://kalanio.tripod.com/Howitwasa1b1x.html
Ahh....isn't our hobby facinating. :-)
Jim
Bluefalcon47
Netherlands
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 255 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Joined: December 01, 2001
KitMaker: 255 posts
Armorama: 0 posts
Posted: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 - 01:53 AM UTC
I KNEW THE ANSWER!!! I KNEW THE ANSWER!!!
What did I win, master Jim???
What did I win, master Jim???